diff options
author | David Vernet <void@manifault.com> | 2022-05-13 06:22:57 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-05-13 17:20:12 +0300 |
commit | cdc69458a5f3d4cf31372efd45fe92cec6b167e4 (patch) | |
tree | 6156a64cffc2c648dc67990b1759ba95563a37ae /tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | |
parent | f0cdaa5687d3178f3759033a7ff8411720b61647 (diff) | |
download | linux-cdc69458a5f3d4cf31372efd45fe92cec6b167e4.tar.xz |
cgroup: account for memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low()
The test_memcg_low() testcase in test_memcontrol.c verifies the expected
behavior of groups using the memory.low knob. Part of the testcase
verifies that a group with memory.low that experiences reclaim due to
memory pressure elsewhere in the system, observes memory.events.low events
as a result of that reclaim.
In commit 8a931f801340 ("mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low
protection"), the memory controller was updated to propagate memory.low
and memory.min protection from a parent group to its children via a
configurable memory_recursiveprot mount option. This unfortunately broke
the memcg tests, which asserts that a sibling that experienced reclaim but
had a memory.low value of 0, would not observe any memory.low events.
This patch updates test_memcg_low() to account for the new behavior
introduced by memory_recursiveprot.
So as to make the test resilient to multiple configurations, the patch
also adds a new proc_mount_contains() helper that checks for a string in
/proc/mounts, and is used to toggle behavior based on whether the default
memory_recursiveprot was present.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220423155619.3669555-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index d240a391f99e..4da138d05acb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ #include "../kselftest.h" #include "cgroup_util.h" +static bool has_recursiveprot; + /* * This test creates two nested cgroups with and without enabling * the memory controller. @@ -525,15 +527,18 @@ static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) } for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) { + int no_low_events_index = has_recursiveprot ? 2 : 1; + oom = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "oom "); low = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "low "); if (oom) goto cleanup; - if (i < 2 && low <= 0) + if (i <= no_low_events_index && low <= 0) goto cleanup; - if (i >= 2 && low) + if (i > no_low_events_index && low) goto cleanup; + } ret = KSFT_PASS; @@ -1382,7 +1387,7 @@ struct memcg_test { int main(int argc, char **argv) { char root[PATH_MAX]; - int i, ret = EXIT_SUCCESS; + int i, proc_status, ret = EXIT_SUCCESS; if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root))) ksft_exit_skip("cgroup v2 isn't mounted\n"); @@ -1398,6 +1403,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) ksft_exit_skip("Failed to set memory controller\n"); + proc_status = proc_mount_contains("memory_recursiveprot"); + if (proc_status < 0) + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n"); + has_recursiveprot = proc_status; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { switch (tests[i].fn(root)) { case KSFT_PASS: |