diff options
author | Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> | 2022-11-30 22:22:38 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2022-12-01 23:42:35 +0300 |
commit | 9f01733387460ee373eb8da4292062ffc5fa340b (patch) | |
tree | f1858d36f98f0a7b93b34e0409a88586d2ece555 /tools/testing | |
parent | 3b502e886d01c2f96b2774176be4c7bceef2516b (diff) | |
download | linux-9f01733387460ee373eb8da4292062ffc5fa340b.tar.xz |
tools/testing/cxl: Add "passphrase secure erase" opcode support
Add support to emulate a CXL mem device support the "passphrase secure
erase" operation.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166983615879.2734609.5177049043677443736.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 102 |
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c index ddd4a17e5564..1008ee2e1e31 100644 --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c @@ -373,6 +373,105 @@ static int mock_unlock_security(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd return 0; } +static int mock_passphrase_secure_erase(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, + struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) +{ + struct cxl_mock_mem_pdata *mdata = dev_get_platdata(cxlds->dev); + struct cxl_pass_erase *erase; + + if (cmd->size_in != sizeof(*erase)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (cmd->size_out != 0) + return -EINVAL; + + erase = cmd->payload_in; + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_FROZEN) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PLIMIT && + erase->type == CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_USER) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PLIMIT && + erase->type == CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_MASTER) { + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SECURITY; + return -ENXIO; + } + + switch (erase->type) { + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_MASTER: + /* + * The spec does not clearly define the behavior of the scenario + * where a master passphrase is passed in while the master + * passphrase is not set and user passphrase is not set. The + * code will take the assumption that it will behave the same + * as a CXL secure erase command without passphrase (0x4401). + */ + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_MASTER_PASS_SET) { + if (memcmp(mdata->master_pass, erase->pass, + NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { + master_plimit_check(mdata); + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; + return -ENXIO; + } + mdata->master_limit = 0; + mdata->user_limit = 0; + mdata->security_state &= ~CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET; + memset(mdata->user_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); + mdata->security_state &= ~CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_LOCKED; + } else { + /* + * CXL rev3 8.2.9.8.6.3 Disable Passphrase + * When master passphrase is disabled, the device shall + * return Invalid Input for the Passphrase Secure Erase + * command with master passphrase. + */ + return -EINVAL; + } + /* Scramble encryption keys so that data is effectively erased */ + break; + case CXL_PMEM_SEC_PASS_USER: + /* + * The spec does not clearly define the behavior of the scenario + * where a user passphrase is passed in while the user + * passphrase is not set. The code will take the assumption that + * it will behave the same as a CXL secure erase command without + * passphrase (0x4401). + */ + if (mdata->security_state & CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET) { + if (memcmp(mdata->user_pass, erase->pass, + NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN)) { + user_plimit_check(mdata); + cmd->return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_PASSPHRASE; + return -ENXIO; + } + mdata->user_limit = 0; + mdata->security_state &= ~CXL_PMEM_SEC_STATE_USER_PASS_SET; + memset(mdata->user_pass, 0, NVDIMM_PASSPHRASE_LEN); + } + + /* + * CXL rev3 Table 8-118 + * If user passphrase is not set or supported by device, current + * passphrase value is ignored. Will make the assumption that + * the operation will proceed as secure erase w/o passphrase + * since spec is not explicit. + */ + + /* Scramble encryption keys so that data is effectively erased */ + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; +} + static int mock_get_lsa(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd) { struct cxl_mbox_get_lsa *get_lsa = cmd->payload_in; @@ -483,6 +582,9 @@ static int cxl_mock_mbox_send(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd * case CXL_MBOX_OP_UNLOCK: rc = mock_unlock_security(cxlds, cmd); break; + case CXL_MBOX_OP_PASSPHRASE_SECURE_ERASE: + rc = mock_passphrase_secure_erase(cxlds, cmd); + break; default: break; } |