summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-01topology/sysfs: Add PPIN in sysfs under cpu topologyTony Luck1-0/+4
PPIN is the Protected Processor Identification Number. This is used to identify the socket as a Field Replaceable Unit (FRU). Existing code only displays this when reporting errors. But this makes it inconvenient for large clusters to use it for its intended purpose of inventory control. Add ppin to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology to make what is already available using RDMSR more easily accessible. Make the file read only for root in case there are still people concerned about making a unique system "serial number" available. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220131230111.2004669-6-tony.luck@intel.com
2021-10-15topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a dieJonathan Cameron1-0/+15
Both ACPI and DT provide the ability to describe additional layers of topology between that of individual cores and higher level constructs such as the level at which the last level cache is shared. In ACPI this can be represented in PPTT as a Processor Hierarchy Node Structure [1] that is the parent of the CPU cores and in turn has a parent Processor Hierarchy Nodes Structure representing a higher level of topology. For example Kunpeng 920 has 6 or 8 clusters in each NUMA node, and each cluster has 4 cpus. All clusters share L3 cache data, but each cluster has local L3 tag. On the other hand, each clusters will share some internal system bus. +-----------------------------------+ +---------+ | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | | | CPU0 | | cpu1 | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | +----+ L3 | | | | +------+ +------+ cluster | | tag | | | | | CPU2 | | CPU3 | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------------------------------+ | | +-----------------------------------+ | | | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | | | L3 | | | | +------+ +------+ +----+ tag | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------------------------------+ | L3 | | data | +-----------------------------------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ +----+ L3 | | | | | | tag | | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------| | | +-----------------------------------| | | | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | +----+ L3 | | | | +------+ +------+ | | tag | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------------------------------+ | | +-----------------------------------+ | | | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | | | L3 | | | | +------+ +------+ +---+ tag | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------------------------------+ | | +-----------------------------------+ | | | +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | | | | L3 | | | | +------+ +------+ +--+ tag | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | | | | +---------+ +-----------------------------------+ That means spreading tasks among clusters will bring more bandwidth while packing tasks within one cluster will lead to smaller cache synchronization latency. So both kernel and userspace will have a chance to leverage this topology to deploy tasks accordingly to achieve either smaller cache latency within one cluster or an even distribution of load among clusters for higher throughput. This patch exposes cluster topology to both kernel and userspace. Libraried like hwloc will know cluster by cluster_cpus and related sysfs attributes. PoC of HWLOC support at [2]. Note this patch only handle the ACPI case. Special consideration is needed for SMT processors, where it is necessary to move 2 levels up the hierarchy from the leaf nodes (thus skipping the processor core level). Note that arm64 / ACPI does not provide any means of identifying a die level in the topology but that may be unrelate to the cluster level. [1] ACPI Specification 6.3 - section 5.2.29.1 processor hierarchy node structure (Type 0) [2] https://github.com/hisilicon/hwloc/tree/linux-cluster Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210924085104.44806-2-21cnbao@gmail.com
2021-06-15docs: cputopology: move the sysfs ABI description to right placeTian Tao1-0/+83
Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst is the wrong place to describe sysfs ABI. So move the cputopology ABI things to Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu and add a reference to ABI doc in Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210319041618.14316-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611052249.25776-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2014-05-28powerpc: Document sysfs DSCR interfaceSam bobroff1-0/+25
Add some documentation about ... /sys/devices/system/cpu/dscr_default /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/dscr ... to Documentation/ABI/stable. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>