| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
That's an adaptation of commit f3a112c0c40d ("x86,rethook,kprobes:
Replace kretprobe with rethook on x86") to s390.
Replaces the kretprobe code with rethook on s390. With this patch,
kretprobe on s390 uses the rethook instead of kretprobe specific
trampoline code.
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
When HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR is defined, the return
address to the fgraph caller is recovered by tagging it along with the
stack pointer of ftrace stack. This makes the stack unwinding more
reliable.
When the fgraph return address is modified to return_to_handler,
ftrace_graph_ret_addr tries to restore it to the original
value using tagged stack pointer.
Fix this by passing tagged sp to ftrace_graph_ret_addr.
Fixes: d81675b60d09 ("s390/unwind: recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.18
Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Based on commit cd9bc2c92588 ("arm64: Recover kretprobe modified return
address in stacktrace").
"""
Since the kretprobe replaces the function return address with
the __kretprobe_trampoline on the stack, stack unwinder shows it
instead of the correct return address.
This checks whether the next return address is the
__kretprobe_trampoline(), and if so, try to find the correct
return address from the kretprobe instance list.
"""
Original patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/163163030719.489837.2236069935502195491.stgit@devnote2/
Reviewed-by: Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
current_stack_pointer() simply returns current value of %r15. If
current_stack_pointer() caller allocates stack (which is the case in
unwind code) %r15 points to a stack frame allocated for callees, meaning
current_stack_pointer() caller (e.g. stack_trace_save) will end up in
the stacktrace. This is not expected by stack_trace_save*() callers and
causes problems.
current_frame_address() on the other hand returns function stack frame
address, which matches %r15 upon function invocation. Using it in
get_stack_pointer() makes it more aligned with x86 implementation
(according to BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST output) and meets stack_trace_save*()
caller's expectations, notably KCSAN.
Also make sure unwind_start is always inlined.
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/patch.git-04dd26be3043.your-ad-here.call-01630504868-ext-6188@work.hours
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
A comment in arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h says:
> If 'first_frame' is not zero unwind_start skips unwind frames until it
> reaches the specified stack pointer.
> The end of the unwinding is indicated with unwind_done, this can be true
> right after unwind_start, e.g. with first_frame!=0 that can not be found.
> unwind_next_frame skips to the next frame.
> Once the unwind is completed unwind_error() can be used to check if there
> has been a situation where the unwinder could not correctly understand
> the tasks call chain.
With this change backchain unwinder now comply with behaviour
described. As well as matches orc unwinder implementation. Now unwinder
starts from reliable state, i.e. __unwind_start own stack frame is
taken or stack frame generated by __switch_to (ksp) - both known to be
valid. In case of pt_regs %r15 is better match for pt_regs psw, than
sometimes random "sp" caller passed.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently unwinder yields 2 entries when pt_regs are met:
sp="address of pt_regs itself" ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"
And neither of those 2 states (combination of sp and ip) ever happened.
reuse_sp has been introduced by commit a1d863ac3e10 ("s390/unwind: fix
mixing regs and sp"). reuse_sp=true makes unwinder keen to produce the
following result, when pt_regs are given (as an arg to unwind_start):
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"
The first state is an actual state in which a task was when pt_regs were
collected. The second state is marked unreliable and is for debugging
purposes to cover the case when a task has been interrupted in between
stack frame allocation and writing back_chain - in this case r14 might
show an actual caller.
Make unwinder behaviour enabled via reuse_sp=true default and drop the
special case handling.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Avoid mixture of task == NULL and task == current meaning the same
thing and simply always initialize task with current in unwind_start.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
unwind_for_each_frame stops after the first frame if regs->gprs[15] <=
sp.
The reason is that in case regs are specified, the first frame should be
regs->psw.addr and the second frame should be sp->gprs[8]. However,
currently the second frame is regs->gprs[15], which confuses
outside_of_stack().
Fix by introducing a flag to distinguish this special case from
unwinding the interrupt handler, for which the current behavior is
appropriate.
Fixes: 78c98f907413 ("s390/unwind: introduce stack unwind API")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Kasan instrumentation of backchain unwinder stack reads is disabled
completely and simply uses READ_ONCE_NOCHECK now.
READ_ONCE_TASK_STACK macro is unused and could be removed.
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Rework the dump_trace() stack unwinder interface to support different
unwinding algorithms. The new interface looks like this:
struct unwind_state state;
unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, regs, start_stack)
do_something(state.sp, state.ip, state.reliable);
The unwind_bc.c file contains the implementation for the classic
back-chain unwinder.
One positive side effect of the new code is it now handles ftraced
functions gracefully. It prints the real name of the return function
instead of 'return_to_handler'.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
