| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add an assembly file aes-xts-avx-x86_64.S which contains a macro that
expands into AES-XTS implementations for x86_64 CPUs that support at
least AES-NI and AVX, optionally also taking advantage of VAES,
VPCLMULQDQ, and AVX512 or AVX10.
This patch doesn't expand the macro at all. Later patches will do so,
adding each implementation individually so that the motivation and use
case for each individual implementation can be fully presented.
The file also provides a function aes_xts_encrypt_iv() which handles the
encryption of the IV (tweak), using AES-NI and AVX.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
aria-avx512 implementation uses AVX512 and GFNI.
It supports 64way parallel processing.
So, byteslicing code is changed to support 64way parallel.
And it exports some aria-avx2 functions such as encrypt() and decrypt().
AVX and AVX2 have 16 registers.
They should use memory to store/load state because of lack of registers.
But AVX512 supports 32 registers.
So, it doesn't require store/load in the s-box layer.
It means that it can reduce overhead of store/load in the s-box layer.
Also code become much simpler.
Benchmark with modprobe tcrypt mode=610 num_mb=8192, i3-12100:
ARIA-AVX512(128bit and 256bit)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx512) encryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 1504 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 4595 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 1763 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5540 cycles (4096 bytes)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx512) decryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 1502 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 4615 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 1759 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5554 cycles (4096 bytes)
ARIA-AVX2 with GFNI(128bit and 256bit)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx2) encryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2003 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5867 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2358 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 7295 cycles (4096 bytes)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx2) decryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2004 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5956 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2409 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 7564 cycles (4096 bytes)
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
aria-avx2 implementation uses AVX2, AES-NI, and GFNI.
It supports 32way parallel processing.
So, byteslicing code is changed to support 32way parallel.
And it exports some aria-avx functions such as encrypt() and decrypt().
There are two main logics, s-box layer and diffusion layer.
These codes are the same as aria-avx implementation.
But some instruction are exchanged because they don't support 256bit
registers.
Also, AES-NI doesn't support 256bit register.
So, aesenclast and aesdeclast are used twice like below:
vextracti128 $1, ymm0, xmm6;
vaesenclast xmm7, xmm0, xmm0;
vaesenclast xmm7, xmm6, xmm6;
vinserti128 $1, xmm6, ymm0, ymm0;
Benchmark with modprobe tcrypt mode=610 num_mb=8192, i3-12100:
ARIA-AVX2 with GFNI(128bit and 256bit)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx2) encryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2003 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5867 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2358 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 7295 cycles (4096 bytes)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx2) decryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2004 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 5956 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2409 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 7564 cycles (4096 bytes)
ARIA-AVX with GFNI(128bit and 256bit)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx) encryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2761 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 9390 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 3401 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 11876 cycles (4096 bytes)
testing speed of multibuffer ecb(aria) (ecb-aria-avx) decryption
tcrypt: 1 operation in 2735 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 9424 cycles (4096 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 3369 cycles (1024 bytes)
tcrypt: 1 operation in 11954 cycles (4096 bytes)
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
curve25519-x86_64.c fails to build when CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL is enabled.
The error is "inline assembly requires more registers than available"
thrown from the `fsqr()` function. Therefore, excluding this file from
GCOV profiling until this issue is resolved. Thereby allowing
CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL to be enabled for x86.
Signed-off-by: Joe Fradley <joefradley@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
aria cipher
The implementation is based on the 32-bit implementation of the aria.
Also, aria-avx process steps are the similar to the camellia-avx.
1. Byteslice(16way)
2. Add-round-key.
3. Sbox
4. Diffusion layer.
Except for s-box, all steps are the same as the aria-generic
implementation. s-box step is very similar to camellia and
sm4 implementation.
There are 2 implementations for s-box step.
One is to use AES-NI and affine transformation, which is the same as
Camellia, sm4, and others.
Another is to use GFNI.
GFNI implementation is faster than AES-NI implementation.
So, it uses GFNI implementation if the running CPU supports GFNI.
There are 4 s-boxes in the ARIA and the 2 s-boxes are the same as
AES's s-boxes.
To calculate the first sbox, it just uses the aesenclast and then
inverts shift_row.
No more process is needed for this job because the first s-box is
the same as the AES encryption s-box.
To calculate the second sbox(invert of s1), it just uses the aesdeclast
and then inverts shift_row.
No more process is needed for this job because the second s-box is
the same as the AES decryption s-box.
To calculate the third s-box, it uses the aesenclast,
then affine transformation, which is combined AES inverse affine and
ARIA S2.
To calculate the last s-box, it uses the aesdeclast,
then affine transformation, which is combined X2 and AES forward affine.
The optimized third and last s-box logic and GFNI s-box logic are
implemented by Jussi Kivilinna.
The aria-generic implementation is based on a 32-bit implementation,
not an 8-bit implementation. the aria-avx Diffusion Layer implementation
is based on aria-generic implementation because 8-bit implementation is
not fit for parallel implementation but 32-bit is enough to fit for this.
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
BLAKE2s has no currently known use as an shash. Just remove all of this
unnecessary plumbing. Removing this shash was something we talked about
back when we were making BLAKE2s a built-in, but I simply never got
around to doing it. So this completes that project.
Importantly, this fixs a bug in which the lib code depends on
crypto_simd_disabled_for_test, causing linker errors.
Also add more alignment tests to the selftests and compare SIMD and
non-SIMD compression functions, to make up for what we lose from
testmgr.c.
Reported-by: gaochao <gaochao49@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 6048fdcc5f26 ("lib/crypto: blake2s: include as built-in")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add hardware accelerated version of POLYVAL for x86-64 CPUs with
PCLMULQDQ support.
This implementation is accelerated using PCLMULQDQ instructions to
perform the finite field computations. For added efficiency, 8 blocks
of the message are processed simultaneously by precomputing the first
8 powers of the key.
Schoolbook multiplication is used instead of Karatsuba multiplication
because it was found to be slightly faster on x86-64 machines.
Montgomery reduction must be used instead of Barrett reduction due to
the difference in modulus between POLYVAL's field and other finite
fields.
More information on POLYVAL can be found in the HCTR2 paper:
"Length-preserving encryption with HCTR2":
https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1441.pdf
Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch adds AVX assembly accelerated implementation of SM3 secure
hash algorithm. From the benchmark data, compared to pure software
implementation sm3-generic, the performance increase is up to 38%.
The main algorithm implementation based on SM3 AES/BMI2 accelerated
work by libgcrypt at:
https://gnupg.org/software/libgcrypt/index.html
Benchmark on Intel i5-6200U 2.30GHz, performance data of two
implementations, pure software sm3-generic and sm3-avx acceleration.
The data comes from the 326 mode and 422 mode of tcrypt. The abscissas
are different lengths of per update. The data is tabulated and the
unit is Mb/s:
update-size | 16 64 256 1024 2048 4096 8192
------------+-------------------------------------------------------
sm3-generic | 105.97 129.60 182.12 189.62 188.06 193.66 194.88
sm3-avx | 119.87 163.05 244.44 260.92 257.60 264.87 265.88
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
In preparation for using blake2s in the RNG, we change the way that it
is wired-in to the build system. Instead of using ifdefs to select the
right symbol, we use weak symbols. And because ARM doesn't need the
generic implementation, we make the generic one default only if an arch
library doesn't need it already, and then have arch libraries that do
need it opt-in. So that the arch libraries can remain tristate rather
than bool, we then split the shash part from the glue code.
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Like the implementation of AESNI/AVX, this patch adds an accelerated
implementation of AESNI/AVX2. In terms of code implementation, by
reusing AESNI/AVX mode-related codes, the amount of code is greatly
reduced. From the benchmark data, it can be seen that when the block
size is 1024, compared to AVX acceleration, the performance achieved
by AVX2 has increased by about 70%, it is also 7.7 times of the pure
software implementation of sm4-generic.
The main algorithm implementation comes from SM4 AES-NI work by
libgcrypt and Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen at:
https://github.com/mjosaarinen/sm4ni
This optimization supports the four modes of SM4, ECB, CBC, CFB,
and CTR. Since CBC and CFB do not support multiple block parallel
encryption, the optimization effect is not obvious.
Benchmark on Intel i5-6200U 2.30GHz, performance data of three
implementation methods, pure software sm4-generic, aesni/avx
acceleration, and aesni/avx2 acceleration, the data comes from
the 218 mode and 518 mode of tcrypt. The abscissas are blocks of
different lengths. The data is tabulated and the unit is Mb/s:
block-size | 16 64 128 256 1024 1420 4096
sm4-generic
ECB enc | 60.94 70.41 72.27 73.02 73.87 73.58 73.59
ECB dec | 61.87 70.53 72.15 73.09 73.89 73.92 73.86
CBC enc | 56.71 66.31 68.05 69.84 70.02 70.12 70.24
CBC dec | 54.54 65.91 68.22 69.51 70.63 70.79 70.82
CFB enc | 57.21 67.24 69.10 70.25 70.73 70.52 71.42
CFB dec | 57.22 64.74 66.31 67.24 67.40 67.64 67.58
CTR enc | 59.47 68.64 69.91 71.02 71.86 71.61 71.95
CTR dec | 59.94 68.77 69.95 71.00 71.84 71.55 71.95
sm4-aesni-avx
ECB enc | 44.95 177.35 292.06 316.98 339.48 322.27 330.59
ECB dec | 45.28 178.66 292.31 317.52 339.59 322.52 331.16
CBC enc | 57.75 67.68 69.72 70.60 71.48 71.63 71.74
CBC dec | 44.32 176.83 284.32 307.24 328.61 312.61 325.82
CFB enc | 57.81 67.64 69.63 70.55 71.40 71.35 71.70
CFB dec | 43.14 167.78 282.03 307.20 328.35 318.24 325.95
CTR enc | 42.35 163.32 279.11 302.93 320.86 310.56 317.93
CTR dec | 42.39 162.81 278.49 302.37 321.11 310.33 318.37
sm4-aesni-avx2
ECB enc | 45.19 177.41 292.42 316.12 339.90 322.53 330.54
ECB dec | 44.83 178.90 291.45 317.31 339.85 322.55 331.07
CBC enc | 57.66 67.62 69.73 70.55 71.58 71.66 71.77
CBC dec | 44.34 176.86 286.10 501.68 559.58 483.87 527.46
CFB enc | 57.43 67.60 69.61 70.52 71.43 71.28 71.65
CFB dec | 43.12 167.75 268.09 499.33 558.35 490.36 524.73
CTR enc | 42.42 163.39 256.17 493.95 552.45 481.58 517.19
CTR dec | 42.49 163.11 256.36 493.34 552.62 481.49 516.83
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch adds AES-NI/AVX/x86_64 assembler implementation of SM4
block cipher. Through two affine transforms, we can use the AES S-Box
to simulate the SM4 S-Box to achieve the effect of instruction
acceleration.
The main algorithm implementation comes from SM4 AES-NI work by
libgcrypt and Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen at:
https://github.com/mjosaarinen/sm4ni
This optimization supports the four modes of SM4, ECB, CBC, CFB, and
CTR. Since CBC and CFB do not support multiple block parallel
encryption, the optimization effect is not obvious.
Benchmark on Intel Xeon Cascadelake, the data comes from the 218 mode
and 518 mode of tcrypt. The abscissas are blocks of different lengths.
The data is tabulated and the unit is Mb/s:
sm4-generic | 16 64 128 256 1024 1420 4096
ECB enc | 40.99 46.50 48.05 48.41 49.20 49.25 49.28
ECB dec | 41.07 46.99 48.15 48.67 49.20 49.25 49.29
CBC enc | 37.71 45.28 46.77 47.60 48.32 48.37 48.40
CBC dec | 36.48 44.82 46.43 47.45 48.23 48.30 48.36
CFB enc | 37.94 44.84 46.12 46.94 47.57 47.46 47.68
CFB dec | 37.50 42.84 43.74 44.37 44.85 44.80 44.96
CTR enc | 39.20 45.63 46.75 47.49 48.09 47.85 48.08
CTR dec | 39.64 45.70 46.72 47.47 47.98 47.88 48.06
sm4-aesni-avx
ECB enc | 33.75 134.47 221.64 243.43 264.05 251.58 258.13
ECB dec | 34.02 134.92 223.11 245.14 264.12 251.04 258.33
CBC enc | 38.85 46.18 47.67 48.34 49.00 48.96 49.14
CBC dec | 33.54 131.29 223.88 245.27 265.50 252.41 263.78
CFB enc | 38.70 46.10 47.58 48.29 49.01 48.94 49.19
CFB dec | 32.79 128.40 223.23 244.87 265.77 253.31 262.79
CTR enc | 32.58 122.23 220.29 241.16 259.57 248.32 256.69
CTR dec | 32.81 122.47 218.99 241.54 258.42 248.58 256.61
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Now that all the stack alignment prologues have been cleaned up in the
crypto code, enable objtool. Among other benefits, this will allow ORC
unwinding to work.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fc2a1918c50e33e46ef0e9a5de02743f2f6e3639.1614182415.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
|
All dependencies on the x86 glue helper module have been replaced by
local instantiations of the new ECB/CBC preprocessor helper macros, so
the glue helper module can be retired.
Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Now that the kernel specifies binutils 2.23 as the minimum version, we
can remove ifdefs for AVX2 and ADX throughout.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
poly1305-x86_64-cryptogams.S is a generated file, so it should be
cleaned up by 'make clean'.
Assigning it to the variable 'targets' teaches Kbuild that it is a
generated file. However, this line is not evaluated when cleaning
because scripts/Makefile.clean does not include include/config/auto.conf.
Remove the ifneq-conditional, so this file is correctly cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that assembler capabilities are probed inside of Kconfig, we can set
up proper Kconfig-based dependencies. We also take this opportunity to
reorder the Makefile, so that items are grouped logically by primitive.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
CONFIG_AS_AVX was introduced by commit ea4d26ae24e5 ("raid5: add AVX
optimized RAID5 checksumming").
We raise the minimal supported binutils version from time to time.
The last bump was commit 1fb12b35e5ff ("kbuild: Raise the minimum
required binutils version to 2.21").
I confirmed the code in $(call as-instr,...) can be assembled by the
binutils 2.21 assembler and also by LLVM integrated assembler.
Remove CONFIG_AS_AVX, which is always defined.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Some older version of GAS do not support the ADX instructions, similarly
to how they also don't support AVX and such. This commit adds the same
build-time detection mechanisms we use for AVX and others for ADX, and
then makes sure that the curve25519 library dispatcher calls the right
functions.
Reported-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
These x86_64 vectorized implementations support AVX, AVX-2, and AVX512F.
The AVX-512F implementation is disabled on Skylake, due to throttling,
but it is quite fast on >= Cannonlake.
On the left is cycle counts on a Core i7 6700HQ using the AVX-2
codepath, comparing this implementation ("new") to the implementation in
the current crypto api ("old"). On the right are benchmarks on a Xeon
Gold 5120 using the AVX-512 codepath. The new implementation is faster
on all benchmarks.
AVX-2 AVX-512
--------- -----------
size old new size old new
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
0 70 68 0 74 70
16 92 90 16 96 92
32 134 104 32 136 106
48 172 120 48 184 124
64 218 136 64 218 138
80 254 158 80 260 160
96 298 174 96 300 176
112 342 192 112 342 194
128 388 212 128 384 212
144 428 228 144 420 226
160 466 246 160 464 248
176 510 264 176 504 264
192 550 282 192 544 282
208 594 302 208 582 300
224 628 316 224 624 318
240 676 334 240 662 338
256 716 354 256 708 358
272 764 374 272 748 372
288 802 352 288 788 358
304 420 366 304 422 370
320 428 360 320 432 364
336 484 378 336 486 380
352 426 384 352 434 390
368 478 400 368 480 408
384 488 394 384 490 398
400 542 408 400 542 412
416 486 416 416 492 426
432 534 430 432 538 436
448 544 422 448 546 432
464 600 438 464 600 448
480 540 448 480 548 456
496 594 464 496 594 476
512 602 456 512 606 470
528 656 476 528 656 480
544 600 480 544 606 498
560 650 494 560 652 512
576 664 490 576 662 508
592 714 508 592 716 522
608 656 514 608 664 538
624 708 532 624 710 552
640 716 524 640 720 516
656 770 536 656 772 526
672 716 548 672 722 544
688 770 562 688 768 556
704 774 552 704 778 556
720 826 568 720 832 568
736 768 574 736 780 584
752 822 592 752 826 600
768 830 584 768 836 560
784 884 602 784 888 572
800 828 610 800 838 588
816 884 628 816 884 604
832 888 618 832 894 598
848 942 632 848 946 612
864 884 644 864 896 628
880 936 660 880 942 644
896 948 652 896 952 608
912 1000 664 912 1004 616
928 942 676 928 954 634
944 994 690 944 1000 646
960 1002 680 960 1008 646
976 1054 694 976 1062 658
992 1002 706 992 1012 674
1008 1052 720 1008 1058 690
This commit wires in the prior implementation from Andy, and makes the
following changes to be suitable for kernel land.
- Some cosmetic and structural changes, like renaming labels to
.Lname, constants, and other Linux conventions, as well as making
the code easy for us to maintain moving forward.
- CPU feature checking is done in C by the glue code.
- We avoid jumping into the middle of functions, to appease objtool,
and instead parameterize shared code.
- We maintain frame pointers so that stack traces make sense.
- We remove the dependency on the perl xlate code, which transforms
the output into things that assemblers we don't care about use.
Importantly, none of our changes affect the arithmetic or core code, but
just involve the differing environment of kernel space.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
Co-developed-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This implementation is the fastest available x86_64 implementation, and
unlike Sandy2x, it doesn't requie use of the floating point registers at
all. Instead it makes use of BMI2 and ADX, available on recent
microarchitectures. The implementation was written by Armando
Faz-Hernández with contributions (upstream) from Samuel Neves and me,
in addition to further changes in the kernel implementation from us.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
Co-developed-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
[ardb: - move to arch/x86/crypto
- wire into lib/crypto framework
- implement crypto API KPP hooks ]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
These implementations from Samuel Neves support AVX and AVX-512VL.
Originally this used AVX-512F, but Skylake thermal throttling made
AVX-512VL more attractive and possible to do with negligable difference.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
Co-developed-by: Samuel Neves <sneves@dei.uc.pt>
[ardb: move to arch/x86/crypto, wire into lib/crypto framework]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Three variants of AEGIS were proposed for the CAESAR competition, and
only one was selected for the final portfolio: AEGIS128.
The other variants, AEGIS128L and AEGIS256, are not likely to ever turn
up in networking protocols or other places where interoperability
between Linux and other systems is a concern, nor are they likely to
be subjected to further cryptanalysis. However, uninformed users may
think that AEGIS128L (which is faster) is equally fit for use.
So let's remove them now, before anyone starts using them and we are
forced to support them forever.
Note that there are no known flaws in the algorithms or in any of these
implementations, but they have simply outlived their usefulness.
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which
is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically
broken [0]. (Note that this is not an implementation defect, but a
flaw in the underlying algorithm). Since it is unlikely to be in use
currently, let's remove it before we're stuck with it.
[0] https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/172.pdf
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The AES assembler code for x86 isn't actually faster than code
generated by the compiler from aes_generic.c, and considering
the disproportionate maintenance burden of assembler code on
x86, it is better just to drop it entirely. Modern x86 systems
will use AES-NI anyway, and given that the modules being removed
have a dependency on aes_generic already, we can remove them
without running the risk of regressions.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
In preparation for adding XChaCha12 support, rename/refactor the x86_64
SIMD implementations of ChaCha20 to support different numbers of rounds.
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add a 64-bit AVX2 implementation of NHPoly1305, an ε-almost-∆-universal
hash function used in the Adiantum encryption mode. For now, only the
NH portion is actually AVX2-accelerated; the Poly1305 part is less
performance-critical so is just implemented in C.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add a 64-bit SSE2 implementation of NHPoly1305, an ε-almost-∆-universal
hash function used in the Adiantum encryption mode. For now, only the
NH portion is actually SSE2-accelerated; the Poly1305 part is less
performance-critical so is just implemented in C.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This variant is similar to the AVX2 version, but benefits from the AVX-512
rotate instructions and the additional registers, so it can operate without
any data on the stack. It uses ymm registers only to avoid the massive core
throttling on Skylake-X platforms. Nontheless does it bring a ~30% speed
improvement compared to the AVX2 variant for random encryption lengths.
The AVX2 version uses "rep movsb" for partial block XORing via the stack.
With AVX-512, the new "vmovdqu8" can do this much more efficiently. The
associated "kmov" instructions to work with dynamic masks is not part of
the AVX-512VL instruction set, hence we depend on AVX-512BW as well. Given
that the major AVX-512VL architectures provide AVX-512BW and this extension
does not affect core clocking, this seems to be no problem at least for
now.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
For historical reasons, the AES-NI based implementation of the PCBC
chaining mode uses a special FPU chaining mode wrapper template to
amortize the FPU start/stop overhead over multiple blocks.
When this FPU wrapper was introduced, it supported widely used
chaining modes such as XTS and CTR (as well as LRW), but currently,
PCBC is the only remaining user.
Since there are no known users of pcbc(aes) in the kernel, let's remove
this special driver, and rely on the generic pcbc driver to encapsulate
the AES-NI core cipher.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
As it turns out, the AVX2 multibuffer SHA routines are currently
broken [0], in a way that would have likely been noticed if this
code were in wide use. Since the code is too complicated to be
maintained by anyone except the original authors, and since the
performance benefits for real-world use cases are debatable to
begin with, it is better to drop it entirely for the moment.
[0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=153476243825350&w=2
Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Cc: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The x86 assembly implementations of Salsa20 use the frame base pointer
register (%ebp or %rbp), which breaks frame pointer convention and
breaks stack traces when unwinding from an interrupt in the crypto code.
Recent (v4.10+) kernels will warn about this, e.g.
WARNING: kernel stack regs at 00000000a8291e69 in syzkaller047086:4677 has bad 'bp' value 000000001077994c
[...]
But after looking into it, I believe there's very little reason to still
retain the x86 Salsa20 code. First, these are *not* vectorized
(SSE2/SSSE3/AVX2) implementations, which would be needed to get anywhere
close to the best Salsa20 performance on any remotely modern x86
processor; they're just regular x86 assembly. Second, it's still
unclear that anyone is actually using the kernel's Salsa20 at all,
especially given that now ChaCha20 is supported too, and with much more
efficient SSSE3 and AVX2 implementations. Finally, in benchmarks I did
on both Intel and AMD processors with both gcc 8.1.0 and gcc 4.9.4, the
x86_64 salsa20-asm is actually slightly *slower* than salsa20-generic
(~3% slower on Skylake, ~10% slower on Zen), while the i686 salsa20-asm
is only slightly faster than salsa20-generic (~15% faster on Skylake,
~20% faster on Zen). The gcc version made little difference.
So, the x86_64 salsa20-asm is pretty clearly useless. That leaves just
the i686 salsa20-asm, which based on my tests provides a 15-20% speed
boost. But that's without updating the code to not use %ebp. And given
the maintenance cost, the small speed difference vs. salsa20-generic,
the fact that few people still use i686 kernels, the doubt that anyone
is even using the kernel's Salsa20 at all, and the fact that a SSE2
implementation would almost certainly be much faster on any remotely
modern x86 processor yet no one has cared enough to add one yet, I don't
think it's worthwhile to keep.
Thus, just remove both the x86_64 and i686 salsa20-asm implementations.
Reported-by: syzbot+ffa3a158337bbc01ff09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Commit 56e8e57fc3a7 ("crypto: morus - Add common SIMD glue code for
MORUS") accidetally consiedered the glue code to be usable by different
architectures, but it seems to be only usable on x86.
This patch moves it under arch/x86/crypto and adds 'depends on X86' to
the Kconfig options and also removes the prompt to hide these internal
options from the user.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch adds optimized implementations of MORUS-640 and MORUS-1280,
utilizing the SSE2 and AVX2 x86 extensions.
For MORUS-1280 (which operates on 256-bit blocks) we provide both AVX2
and SSE2 implementation. Although SSE2 MORUS-1280 is slower than AVX2
MORUS-1280, it is comparable in speed to the SSE2 MORUS-640.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch adds optimized implementations of AEGIS-128, AEGIS-128L,
and AEGIS-256, utilizing the AES-NI and SSE2 x86 extensions.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In preparation for an objtool rewrite which will have broader checks,
whitelist functions and files which cause problems because they do
unusual things with the stack.
These whitelists serve as a TODO list for which functions and files
don't yet have undwarf unwinder coverage. Eventually most of the
whitelists can be removed in favor of manual CFI hint annotations or
objtool improvements.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7f934a5d707a574bda33ea282e9478e627fb1829.1498659915.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
This patch introduces the multi-buffer job manager which is responsible
for submitting scatter-gather buffers from several SHA512 jobs to the
multi-buffer algorithm. It also contains the flush routine that's called
by the crypto daemon to complete the job when no new jobs arrive before
the deadline of maximum latency of a SHA512 crypto job.
The SHA512 multi-buffer crypto algorithm is defined and initialized in this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Until now, there was only support for the SHA1 multibuffer algorithm.
Hence, there was just one sha-mb folder. Now, with the introduction of
the SHA256 multi-buffer algorithm , it is logical to name the existing
folder as sha1-mb.
Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch introduces the multi-buffer job manager which is responsible for
submitting scatter-gather buffers from several SHA256 jobs to the
multi-buffer algorithm. It also contains the flush routine to that's
called by the crypto daemon to complete the job when no new jobs arrive
before the deadline of maximum latency of a SHA256 crypto job.
The SHA256 multi-buffer crypto algorithm is defined and initialized in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
and SHA256
This patch provides the configuration and build support to
include and build the optimized SHA1 and SHA256 update transforms
for the kernel's crypto library.
Originally-by: Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli_7982@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two
block SSE2:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec, 367317552 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec, 571069267 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec, 906154627 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec, 393913872 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec, 592381958 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 574940 opers/sec, 607136745 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 293308 opers/sec, 610082096 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This
single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses
SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel.
When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/
kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the
poly1305-generic fallback for small updates.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to
poly1305-generic:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec, 391682496 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec, 597225024 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec, 922536057 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec, 420301267 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec, 609171609 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 593000 opers/sec, 626208000 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 302077 opers/sec, 628320576 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing eight
ChaCha20 blocks in parallel using AVX2.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~55-70% compared to four block
SSSE3:
testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes)
testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 41999675 operations in 10 seconds (671994800 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 45805908 operations in 10 seconds (2931578112 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 32814947 operations in 10 seconds (8400626432 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 19777167 operations in 10 seconds (20251819008 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 2279321 operations in 10 seconds (18672197632 bytes)
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the ChaCha20 stream cipher. This
single block variant works on a single state matrix using SSE instructions.
It requires SSSE3 due the use of pshufb for efficient 8/16-bit rotate
operations.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~65% compared to
chacha20-generic:
testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-generic) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 45089207 operations in 10 seconds (721427312 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 43839521 operations in 10 seconds (2805729344 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 12702056 operations in 10 seconds (3251726336 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 3371173 operations in 10 seconds (3452081152 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 422468 operations in 10 seconds (3460857856 bytes)
testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes)
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch fixes this allyesconfig target build error with older
binutils.
LD arch/x86/crypto/built-in.o
ld: arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/built-in.o: No such file: No such file or directory
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee <vlee@twitter.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch introduces the multi-buffer job manager which is responsible
for submitting scatter-gather buffers from several SHA1 jobs to the
multi-buffer algorithm. It also contains the flush routine to that's
called by the crypto daemon to complete the job when no new jobs arrive
before the deadline of maximum latency of a SHA1 crypto job.
The SHA1 multi-buffer crypto algorithm is defined and initialized in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch introduces "by8" AES CTR mode AVX optimization inspired by
Intel Optimized IPSEC Cryptograhpic library. For additional information,
please see:
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=22972
The functions aes_ctr_enc_128_avx_by8(), aes_ctr_enc_192_avx_by8() and
aes_ctr_enc_256_avx_by8() are adapted from
Intel Optimized IPSEC Cryptographic library. When both AES and AVX features
are enabled in a platform, the glue code in AESNI module overrieds the
existing "by4" CTR mode en/decryption with the "by8"
AES CTR mode en/decryption.
On a Haswell desktop, with turbo disabled and all cpus running
at maximum frequency, the "by8" CTR mode optimization
shows better performance results across data & key sizes
as measured by tcrypt.
The average performance improvement of the "by8" version over the "by4"
version is as follows:
For 128 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 10-16% improvement.
For 192 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 20-22% improvement.
For 256 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 20-25% improvement.
A typical run of tcrypt with AES CTR mode encryption of the "by4" and "by8"
optimization shows the following results:
tcrypt with "by4" AES CTR mode encryption optimization on a Haswell Desktop:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 343 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 336 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 491 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1130 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7309 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 346 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 361 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 543 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1321 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9649 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 369 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 366 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 595 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1531 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 10522 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 336 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 350 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 487 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1129 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7287 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 350 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 359 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 635 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1324 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9595 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 364 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 377 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 604 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1527 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 10549 cycles (8192 bytes)
tcrypt with "by8" AES CTR mode encryption optimization on a Haswell Desktop:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 340 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 330 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 450 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1043 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6597 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 339 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 352 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 539 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1153 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8458 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 353 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 360 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 512 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1277 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8745 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 348 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 335 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 451 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1030 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6611 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 354 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 346 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 488 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1154 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8390 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 357 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 362 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 515 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1284 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8681 cycles (8192 bytes)
crypto: Incorporate feed back to AES CTR mode optimization patch
Specifically, the following:
a) alignment around main loop in aes_ctrby8_avx_x86_64.S
b) .rodata around data constants used in the assembely code.
c) the use of CONFIG_AVX in the glue code.
d) fix up white space.
e) informational message for "by8" AES CTR mode optimization
f) "by8" AES CTR mode optimization can be simply enabled
if the platform supports both AES and AVX features. The
optimization works superbly on Sandybridge as well.
Testing on Haswell shows no performance change since the last.
Testing on Sandybridge shows that the "by8" AES CTR mode optimization
greatly improves performance.
tcrypt log with "by4" AES CTR mode optimization on Sandybridge
--------------------------------------------------------------
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 383 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 408 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 707 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1864 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 12813 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 395 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 432 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 780 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2132 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 15765 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 416 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 438 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 842 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2383 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 16945 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 389 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 409 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 704 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1865 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 12783 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 409 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 434 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 792 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2151 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 15804 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 421 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 444 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 840 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2394 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 16928 cycles (8192 bytes)
tcrypt log with "by8" AES CTR mode optimization on Sandybridge
--------------------------------------------------------------
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 383 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 401 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 522 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1136 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7046 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 394 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 418 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 559 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1263 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9072 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 408 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 428 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 595 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1385 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9224 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 390 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 402 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 530 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1135 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7079 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 414 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 417 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 572 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1312 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9073 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 415 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 454 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 598 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1407 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9288 cycles (8192 bytes)
crypto: Fix redundant checks
a) Fix the redundant check for cpu_has_aes
b) Fix the key length check when invoking the CTR mode "by8"
encryptor/decryptor.
crypto: fix typo in AES ctr mode transform
Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Patch adds x86_64 assembly implementation of Triple DES EDE cipher algorithm.
Two assembly implementations are provided. First is regular 'one-block at
time' encrypt/decrypt function. Second is 'three-blocks at time' function that
gains performance increase on out-of-order CPUs.
tcrypt test results:
Intel Core i5-4570:
des3_ede-asm vs des3_ede-generic:
size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec
16B 1.21x 1.22x 1.27x 1.36x 1.25x 1.25x
64B 1.98x 1.96x 1.23x 2.04x 2.01x 2.00x
256B 2.34x 2.37x 1.21x 2.40x 2.38x 2.39x
1024B 2.50x 2.47x 1.22x 2.51x 2.52x 2.51x
8192B 2.51x 2.53x 1.21x 2.56x 2.54x 2.55x
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This git patch adds x86_64 AVX2 optimization of SHA1
transform to crypto support. The patch has been tested with 3.14.0-rc1
kernel.
On a Haswell desktop, with turbo disabled and all cpus running
at maximum frequency, tcrypt shows AVX2 performance improvement
from 3% for 256 bytes update to 16% for 1024 bytes update over
AVX implementation.
This patch adds sha1_avx2_transform(), the glue, build and
configuration changes needed for AVX2 optimization of
SHA1 transform to crypto support.
sha1-ssse3 is one module which adds the necessary optimization
support (SSSE3/AVX/AVX2) for the low-level SHA1 transform function.
With better optimization support, transform function is overridden
as the case may be. In the case of AVX2, due to performance reasons
across datablock sizes, the AVX or AVX2 transform function is used
at run-time as it suits best. The Makefile change therefore appends
the necessary objects to the linkage. Due to this, the patch merely
appends AVX2 transform to the existing build mix and Kconfig support
and leaves the configuration build support as is.
Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
We rename aesni-intel_avx.S to aesni-intel_avx-x86_64.S to indicate
that it is only used by x86_64 architecture.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
