summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/scan.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-11-03Merge tag 'acpi-5.16-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+6
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These update the ACPICA code in the kernel to the most recent upstream revision, address some issues related to the ACPI power resources management, simplify the enumeration of PCI devices having ACPI companions, add new quirks, fix assorted problems, update the ACPI-related information in maintainers and clean up code in several places. Specifics: - Update the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision 20210930 including the following changes: - Fix system-wide resume issue caused by evaluating control methods too early in the resume path (Rafael Wysocki). - Add support for Windows 2020 _OSI string (Mario Limonciello). - Add Generic Port Affinity type for SRAT (Alison Schofield). - Add disassembly support for the NHLT ACPI table (Bob Moore). - Avoid flushing caches before entering C3 type of idle states on AMD processors (Deepak Sharma). - Avoid enumerating CPUs that are not present and not online-capable according to the platform firmware (Mario Limonciello). - Add DMI-based mechanism to quirk IRQ overrides and use it for two platforms (Hui Wang). - Change the configuration of unused ACPI device objects to reflect the D3cold power state after enumerating devices (Rafael Wysocki). - Update MAINTAINERS information regarding ACPI (Rafael Wysocki). - Fix typo in ACPI Kconfig (Masanari Iid). - Use sysfs_emit() instead of snprintf() in some places (Qing Wang). - Make the association of ACPI device objects with PCI devices more straightforward and simplify the code doing that for all devices in general (Rafael Wysocki). - Use acpi_device_adr() in acpi_find_child_device() instead of evaluating _ADR (Rafael Wysocki). - Drop duplicate device IDs from PNP device IDs list (Krzysztof Kozlowski). - Allow acpi_idle_play_dead() to use C3 on AMD processors (Richard Gong). - Use ACPI_COMPANION() to simplify code in some drivers (Rafael Wysocki). - Check the states of all ACPI power resources during initialization to avoid dealing with power resources in unknown states (Rafael Wysocki). - Fix ACPI power resource issues related to sharing wakeup power resources (Rafael Wysocki). - Avoid registering redundant suspend_ops (Rafael Wysocki). - Report battery charging state as "full" if it appears to be over the design capacity (André Almeida). - Quirk GK45 mini PC to skip reading _PSR in the AC driver (Stefan Schaeckeler). - Mark apei_hest_parse() static (Christoph Hellwig). - Relax platform response timeout to 1 second after instructing it to inject an error (Shuai Xue). - Make the PRM code handle memory allocation and remapping failures more gracefully and drop some unnecessary blank lines from that code (Aubrey Li). - Fix spelling mistake in the ACPI documentation (Colin Ian King)" * tag 'acpi-5.16-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (36 commits) ACPI: glue: Use acpi_device_adr() in acpi_find_child_device() perf: qcom_l2_pmu: ACPI: Use ACPI_COMPANION() directly ACPI: APEI: mark apei_hest_parse() static ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Relax platform response timeout to 1 second gpio-amdpt: ACPI: Use the ACPI_COMPANION() macro directly nouveau: ACPI: Use the ACPI_COMPANION() macro directly ACPI: resources: Add one more Medion model in IRQ override quirk ACPI: AC: Quirk GK45 to skip reading _PSR ACPI: PM: sleep: Do not set suspend_ops unnecessarily ACPI: PRM: Handle memory allocation and memory remap failure ACPI: PRM: Remove unnecessary blank lines ACPI: PM: Turn off wakeup power resources on _DSW/_PSW errors ACPI: PM: Fix sharing of wakeup power resources ACPI: PM: Turn off unused wakeup power resources ACPI: PM: Check states of power resources during initialization ACPI: replace snprintf() in "show" functions with sysfs_emit() ACPI: LPSS: Use ACPI_COMPANION() directly ACPI: scan: Release PM resources blocked by unused objects ACPI: battery: Accept charges over the design capacity as full ACPICA: Update version to 20210930 ...
2021-10-17hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device()Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
In read_domain_devices(), acpi_bus_get_device() is called to obtain the ACPI device object attached to the given ACPI handle and subsequently that object is passed to get_device() for reference counting, but there is a window between the acpi_bus_get_device() and get_device() calls in which the ACPI device object in question may go away. To address this issue, make read_domain_devices() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() to reference count and return the given ACPI device object in one go and export that function to modules. While at it, also make read_domain_devices() and remove_domain_devices() use acpi_dev_put() instead of calling put_device() directly on the ACPI device objects returned by acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/11871063.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
2021-10-13ACPI: scan: Release PM resources blocked by unused objectsRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+6
On some systems the ACPI namespace contains device objects that are not used in certain configurations of the system. If they start off in the D0 power state configuration, they will stay in it until the system reboots, because of the lack of any mechanism possibly causing their configuration to change. If that happens, they may prevent some power resources from being turned off or generally they may prevent the platform from getting into the deepest low-power states thus causing some energy to be wasted. Address this issue by changing the configuration of unused ACPI device objects to the D3cold power state one after carrying out the ACPI-based enumeration of devices. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211007205126.11769-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com/ Reported-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2021-09-07ACPI: scan: Remove unneeded header linux/nls.hKari Argillander1-1/+0
Code that use linux/nls.h was moved to device_sysfs.c by commit c2efefb33abf ("ACPI / scan: Move sysfs-related device code to a separate file") Remove this include so that complier has easier times and it would be easier to grep where nls code is used. Signed-off-by: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-07-02Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v5.14' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+76
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu Pull iommu updates from Joerg Roedel: - SMMU Updates from Will Deacon: - SMMUv3: - Support stalling faults for platform devices - Decrease defaults sizes for the event and PRI queues - SMMUv2: - Support for a new '->probe_finalize' hook, needed by Nvidia - Even more Qualcomm compatible strings - Avoid Adreno TTBR1 quirk for DB820C platform - Intel VT-d updates from Lu Baolu: - Convert Intel IOMMU to use sva_lib helpers in iommu core - ftrace and debugfs supports for page fault handling - Support asynchronous nested capabilities - Various misc cleanups - Support for new VIOT ACPI table to make the VirtIO IOMMU available on x86 - Add the amd_iommu=force_enable command line option to enable the IOMMU on platforms where they are known to cause problems - Support for version 2 of the Rockchip IOMMU - Various smaller fixes, cleanups and refactorings * tag 'iommu-updates-v5.14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu: (66 commits) iommu/virtio: Enable x86 support iommu/dma: Pass address limit rather than size to iommu_setup_dma_ops() ACPI: Add driver for the VIOT table ACPI: Move IOMMU setup code out of IORT ACPI: arm64: Move DMA setup operations out of IORT iommu/vt-d: Fix dereference of pointer info before it is null checked iommu: Update "iommu.strict" documentation iommu/arm-smmu: Check smmu->impl pointer before dereferencing iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove unnecessary oom message iommu/arm-smmu: Fix arm_smmu_device refcount leak in address translation iommu/arm-smmu: Fix arm_smmu_device refcount leak when arm_smmu_rpm_get fails iommu/vt-d: Fix linker error on 32-bit iommu/vt-d: No need to typecast iommu/vt-d: Define counter explicitly as unsigned int iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary braces iommu/vt-d: Removed unused iommu_count in dmar domain iommu/vt-d: Use bitfields for DMAR capabilities iommu/vt-d: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO macro iommu/vt-d: Fix out-bounds-warning in intel/svm.c iommu/vt-d: Add PRQ handling latency sampling ...
2021-06-30Merge tag 'devprop-5.14-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull device properties framework updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These unify device properties access in some pieces of code and make related changes. Specifics: - Handle device properties with software node API in the ACPI IORT table parsing code (Heikki Krogerus). - Unify of_node access in the common device properties code, constify the acpi_dma_supported() argument pointer and fix up CONFIG_ACPI=n stubs of some functions related to device properties (Andy Shevchenko)" * tag 'devprop-5.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: device property: Unify access to of_node ACPI: scan: Constify acpi_dma_supported() helper function ACPI: property: Constify stubs for CONFIG_ACPI=n case ACPI: IORT: Handle device properties with software node API device property: Retrieve fwnode from of_node via accessor
2021-06-29Merge branches 'acpi-dptf' and 'acpi-messages'Rafael J. Wysocki1-5/+6
* acpi-dptf: ACPI: DPTF: Add battery participant for Intel SoCs * acpi-messages: ACPI: Remove the macro PREFIX "ACPI: " ACPI: sleep: Unify the message printing ACPI: sbs: Unify the message printing ACPI: scan: Unify the log message printing ACPI: sbshc: Unify the message printing ACPI: sysfs: Cleanup message printing ACPI: reboot: Unify the message printing ACPI: processor_throttling: Cleanup the printing messages ACPI: processor_perflib: Cleanup print messages ACPI: processor_thermal: Remove unused PREFIX for printing ACPI: pci_root: Unify the message printing ACPI: osl: Remove the duplicated PREFIX for message printing ACPI: nvs: Unify the message printing ACPI: glue: Clean up the printing messages ACPI: event: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk() ACPI: bus: Use pr_*() macros to replace printk() ACPI: blacklist: Unify the message printing ACPI: cmos_rtc: Using pr_fmt() and remove PREFIX
2021-06-29Merge branches 'acpi-pm', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-resources'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
* acpi-pm: ACPI: PM: postpone bringing devices to D0 unless we need them ACPI: PM: Adjust behavior for field problems on AMD systems ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add support for new Microsoft UUID ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add support for multiple func mask ACPI: PM: s2idle: Refactor common code ACPI: PM: s2idle: Use correct revision id ACPI: power: Use dev_dbg() to print some messages ACPI: sleep: Fix acpi_pm_pre_suspend() kernel-doc ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resources ACPI: power: Save the last known state of each power resource ACPI: power: Use u8 as the power resource state data type ACPI: PM / fan: Put fan device IDs into separate header file ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add missing LPS0 functions for AMD * acpi-processor: ACPI: processor_throttling: Fix several coding style issues ACPI: processor_throttling: Remove redundant initialization of 'obj' ACPI: processor idle: Fix up C-state latency if not ordered * acpi-resources: ACPI: resources: Add checks for ACPI IRQ override
2021-06-29Merge branches 'acpi-bus', 'acpi-scan' and 'acpi-tables'Rafael J. Wysocki1-98/+205
* acpi-bus: ACPI: Remove redundant clearing of context->ret.pointer from acpi_run_osc() * acpi-scan: ACPI: scan: Simplify acpi_table_events_fn() ACPI: scan: Fix race related to dropping dependencies ACPI: scan: Reorganize acpi_device_add() ACPI: scan: Fix device object rescan in acpi_scan_clear_dep() ACPI: scan: Make acpi_walk_dep_device_list() ACPI: scan: Rearrange acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() ACPI: scan: Define acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as static inline ACPI: scan: initialize local variable to avoid garbage being returned ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of ACPI device ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() ACPI: scan: Rearrange dep_unmet initialization * acpi-tables: ACPI: tables: Add custom DSDT file as makefile prerequisite ACPI: bgrt: Use sysfs_emit ACPI: bgrt: Fix CFI violation ACPI: tables: FPDT: Add missing acpi_put_table() in acpi_init_fpdt() ACPI: tables: PPTT: Populate cache-id if provided by firmware
2021-06-25ACPI: Add driver for the VIOT tableJean-Philippe Brucker1-0/+3
The ACPI Virtual I/O Translation Table describes topology of para-virtual platforms, similarly to vendor tables DMAR, IVRS and IORT. For now it describes the relation between virtio-iommu and the endpoints it manages. Three steps are needed to configure DMA of endpoints: (1) acpi_viot_init(): parse the VIOT table, find or create the fwnode associated to each vIOMMU device. This needs to happen after acpi_scan_init(), because it relies on the struct device and their fwnode to be available. (2) When probing the vIOMMU device, the driver registers its IOMMU ops within the IOMMU subsystem. This step doesn't require any intervention from the VIOT driver. (3) viot_iommu_configure(): before binding the endpoint to a driver, find the associated IOMMU ops. Register them, along with the endpoint ID, into the device's iommu_fwspec. If step (3) happens before step (2), it is deferred until the IOMMU is initialized, then retried. Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618152059.1194210-4-jean-philippe@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2021-06-25ACPI: Move IOMMU setup code out of IORTJean-Philippe Brucker1-1/+72
Extract the code that sets up the IOMMU infrastructure from IORT, since it can be reused by VIOT. Move it one level up into a new acpi_iommu_configure_id() function, which calls the IORT parsing function which in turn calls the acpi_iommu_fwspec_init() helper. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618152059.1194210-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2021-06-25ACPI: arm64: Move DMA setup operations out of IORTJean-Philippe Brucker1-1/+1
Extract generic DMA setup code out of IORT, so it can be reused by VIOT. Keep it in drivers/acpi/arm64 for now, since it could break x86 platforms that haven't run this code so far, if they have invalid tables. Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618152059.1194210-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2021-06-21ACPI: scan: Simplify acpi_table_events_fn()Rafael J. Wysocki1-28/+10
Notice that the table field of struct acpi_table_events_work is never read and its event field is always equal to ACPI_TABLE_EVENT_LOAD, so both of them are redundant. Accordingly, drop struct acpi_table_events_work and use struct work_struct directly instead of it, simplify acpi_scan_table_handler() and rename it to acpi_scan_table_notify(). Moreover, make acpi_bus_table_handler() check the event code against ACPI_TABLE_EVENT_LOAD before calling acpi_scan_table_notify(), so it is not necessary to do that check in the latter. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Fix race related to dropping dependenciesRafael J. Wysocki1-13/+32
If acpi_add_single_object() runs concurrently with respect to acpi_scan_clear_dep() which deletes a dependencies list entry where the device being added is the consumer, the device's dep_unmet counter may not be updated to reflect that change. Namely, if the dependencies list entry is deleted right after calling acpi_scan_dep_init() and before calling acpi_device_add(), acpi_scan_clear_dep() will not find the device object corresponding to the consumer device ACPI handle and it will not update its dep_unmet counter to reflect the deletion of the list entry. Consequently, the dep_unmet counter of the device will never become zero going forward which may prevent it from being completely enumerated. To address this problem, modify acpi_add_single_object() to run acpi_tie_acpi_dev(), to attach the ACPI device object created by it to the corresponding ACPI namespace node, under acpi_dep_list_lock along with acpi_scan_dep_init() whenever the latter is called. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Reorganize acpi_device_add()Rafael J. Wysocki1-11/+20
Move the invocation of acpi_attach_data() in acpi_device_add() into a separate function. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Fix device object rescan in acpi_scan_clear_dep()Rafael J. Wysocki1-5/+45
In general, acpi_bus_attach() can only be run safely under acpi_scan_lock, but that lock cannot be acquired under acpi_dep_list_lock, so make acpi_scan_clear_dep() schedule deferred execution of acpi_bus_attach() under acpi_scan_lock instead of calling it directly. This also fixes a possible race between acpi_scan_clear_dep() and device removal that might cause a device object that went away to be accessed, because acpi_scan_clear_dep() is changed to acquire a reference on the consumer device object. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Make acpi_walk_dep_device_list()Rafael J. Wysocki1-4/+3
Because acpi_walk_dep_device_list() is only called by the code in the file in which it is defined, make it static, drop the export of it and drop its header from acpi.h. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Rearrange acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb()Rafael J. Wysocki1-7/+6
Make acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() a bit more straightforward and rewrite the comment in it. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-06-17ACPI: scan: Define acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as static inlineRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+0
Since acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() is a synonym for acpi_dev_put(), define it as static inline in analogy with the latter. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
2021-06-10ACPI: scan: initialize local variable to avoid garbage being returnedColin Ian King1-1/+1
In the unlikely event that there are no callback calls made in acpi_walk_dep_device_list(), local variable ret will be returned as an uninitialized value. Clean up static analysis warnings by ensuring ret is initialized. Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") Fixes: a9e10e587304 ("ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of ACPI deviceDaniel Scally1-0/+35
In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from" the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()Daniel Scally1-18/+51
The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each dependent device of the input. Extend it to accept a callback which can be applied to all the dependencies in acpi_dep_list. Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper, passing a callback that applies the same dependency reduction. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> # for platform/surface parts Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Unify the log message printingHanjun Guo1-5/+6
The log messages in scan.c is not in consistency, some pr_*() calls have PREFIX, but some don't. Using pr_fmt() and remove PREFIX, also replace printk() with pr_*() macro to unify the message printing. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-07ACPI: scan: Constify acpi_dma_supported() helper functionAndy Shevchenko1-1/+1
Constify arguments to acpi_dma_supported(). The function doesn't need to change the content of the passed argument and when it's const it allows to supply the result of other functions that may return a pointer to a constant object. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Subject edit ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-31ACPI: power: Rework turning off unused power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Make turning off unused power resources (after the enumeration of devices and during system-wide resume from S3) more straightforward by using the observation that the power resource state stored in struct acpi_power_resource can be used to determine whether or not the give power resource has any users. Namely, when the state of the power resource is unknown, its _STA method has never been evaluated (or the evaluation of it has failed) and its _ON and _OFF methods have never been executed (or they have failed to execute), so for all practical purposes it can be assumed to have no users (or to be unusable). Therefore, instead of checking the number of power resource users, it is sufficient to check if its state is known. Moreover, if the last known state of a given power resource is "off", it is not necessary to turn it off, because it has been used to initialize the power state or the wakeup power resources list of at least one device and either its _STA method has returned 0 ("off"), or its _OFF method has been successfully executed already. Accordingly, modify acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to do the above checks (which are suitable for both uses of it) instead of using the number of power resource users or evaluating its _STA method, drop its argument (which is not useful any more) and update its callers. Also drop the users field from struct acpi_power_resource as it is not useful any more. Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-24ACPI: power: Refine turning off unused power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Commit 7e4fdeafa61f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally") dropped the power resource state check from acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources(), because according to the ACPI specification (e.g. ACPI 6.4, Section 7.2.2) the OS "may run the _OFF method repeatedly, even if the resource is already off". However, it turns out that some systems do not follow the specification in this particular respect and that commit introduced boot issues on them, so refine acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources() to only turn off power resources without any users after device enumeration and restore its previous behavior in the system-wide resume path. Fixes: 7e4fdeafa61f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally") Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/declaring-a-power-resource-object.html#off BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213019 Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reported-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Tested-by: Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me> Reported-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Tested-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-17ACPI: scan: Rearrange dep_unmet initializationRafael J. Wysocki1-32/+28
The dep_unmet field in struct acpi_device is used to store the number of unresolved _DEP dependencies (that is, operation region dependencies for which there are no drivers present) for the ACPI device object represented by it. That field is initialized to 1 for all ACPI device objects in acpi_add_single_object(), via acpi_init_device_object(), so as to avoid evaluating _STA prematurely for battery device objects in acpi_scan_init_status(), and it is "fixed up" in acpi_bus_check_add() after the acpi_add_single_object() called by it has returned. This is not particularly straightforward and causes dep_unmet to remain 1 for device objects without dependencies created by invoking acpi_add_single_object() directly, outside acpi_bus_check_add(). For this reason, rearrange acpi_add_single_object() to initialize dep_unmet completely before calling acpi_scan_init_status(), which requires passing one extra bool argument to it, and update all of its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-05-13Merge branch 'acpi-pm'Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
* acpi-pm: ACPI: PM: Add ACPI ID of Alder Lake Fan Revert "Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization""
2021-05-10ACPI: scan: Fix a memory leak in an error handling pathChristophe JAILLET1-0/+1
If 'acpi_device_set_name()' fails, we must free 'acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id' or there is a (potential) memory leak. Fixes: eb50aaf960e3 ("ACPI: scan: Use unique number for instance_no") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-10Revert "Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during ↵Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
initialization"" Revert commit 5db91e9cb5b3 ("Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization") which was not necessary. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-05-06Merge branches 'acpi-pm' and 'acpi-docs'Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+0
* acpi-pm: Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization" * acpi-docs: Documentation: firmware-guide: gpio-properties: Add note to SPI CS case
2021-04-30Revert "ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization"Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+0
Revert commit 4b9ee772eaa8 ("ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization") that is reported to cause initialization issues to occur. Reported-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@163.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-26Merge branch 'acpi-misc'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
* acpi-misc: ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: fix various typos in comments
2021-04-26Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-drivers', 'acpi-pm' and 'acpi-resources'Rafael J. Wysocki1-104/+72
* acpi-scan: ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_get() and reuse it in ACPI code ACPI: scan: Utilize match_string() API ACPI: scan: Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_set_pnp_ids() ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_init_device_object() ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_add_single_object() ACPI: scan: Rearrange checks in acpi_bus_check_add() ACPI: scan: Fold acpi_bus_type_and_status() into its caller * acpi-drivers: ACPI: HED: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition * acpi-pm: ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initialization * acpi-resources: resource: Prevent irqresource_disabled() from erasing flags
2021-04-13ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_get() and reuse it in ACPI codeAndy Shevchenko1-5/+4
Introduce acpi_dev_get() to have a symmetrical API with acpi_dev_put() and reuse both in ACPI code in drivers/acpi/. While at it, use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() in one place instead of the above. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-12ACPI: scan: Utilize match_string() APIAndy Shevchenko1-12/+10
We have already an API to match a string in the array of strings. Utilize it instead of open coded analogues. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: scan: Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_set_pnp_ids()Rafael J. Wysocki1-12/+9
Notice that it is not necessary to call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_add_single_object() in order to pass the pointer returned by it to acpi_init_device_object() and from there to acpi_set_pnp_ids(). It is more straightforward to call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_set_pnp_ids() and avoid unnecessary pointer passing, so change the code accordingly. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_init_device_object()Rafael J. Wysocki1-14/+14
Use the observation that the initial status check for ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR objects can be carried out in the same way as for ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE objects and it is not necessary to fail acpi_add_single_object() if acpi_bus_get_status_handle() returns an error for a processor (its status can be set to 0 instead) to simplify acpi_add_single_object(). Accordingly, drop the "sta" argument from acpi_init_device_object() as it can always set the initial status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT and let its caller correct that later on. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: scan: Drop sta argument from acpi_add_single_object()Rafael J. Wysocki1-14/+10
Move the initial status check for ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR objects into acpi_add_single_object() so it is not necessary to pass the "sta" argument to it, get rid of that argument from there and update the callers of that function accordingly. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: scan: Rearrange checks in acpi_bus_check_add()Rafael J. Wysocki1-19/+11
Rearrange the checks in acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid checking the "type" twice and take "check_dep" into account only for ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE objects. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-04-08ACPI: scan: Fold acpi_bus_type_and_status() into its callerRafael J. Wysocki1-48/+32
There is only one caller of acpi_bus_type_and_status() which is acpi_bus_check_add(), so fold the former into the latter and use the observation that the initial status of the device is ACPI_STA_DEFAULT in all cases except for ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR to simplify the code. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-03-30ACPI: scan: Fix _STA getting called on devices with unmet dependenciesHans de Goede1-1/+11
Commit 71da201f38df ("ACPI: scan: Defer enumeration of devices with _DEP lists") dropped the following 2 lines from acpi_init_device_object(): /* Assume there are unmet deps until acpi_device_dep_initialize() runs */ device->dep_unmet = 1; Leaving the initial value of dep_unmet at the 0 from the kzalloc(). This causes the acpi_bus_get_status() call in acpi_add_single_object() to actually call _STA, even though there maybe unmet deps, leading to errors like these: [ 0.123579] ACPI Error: No handler for Region [ECRM] (00000000ba9edc4c) [GenericSerialBus] (20170831/evregion-166) [ 0.123601] ACPI Error: Region GenericSerialBus (ID=9) has no handler (20170831/exfldio-299) [ 0.123618] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.I2C1.BAT1._STA, AE_NOT_EXIST (20170831/psparse-550) Fix this by re-adding the dep_unmet = 1 initialization to acpi_init_device_object() and modifying acpi_bus_check_add() to make sure that dep_unmet always gets setup there, overriding the initial 1 value. This re-fixes the issue initially fixed by commit 63347db0affa ("ACPI / scan: Use acpi_bus_get_status() to initialize ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE devs"), which introduced the removed "device->dep_unmet = 1;" statement. This issue was noticed; and the fix tested on a Dell Venue 10 Pro 5055. Fixes: 71da201f38df ("ACPI: scan: Defer enumeration of devices with _DEP lists") Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: 5.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.11+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-23ACPI: scan: Turn off unused power resources during initializationRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+2
It is reported that on certain platforms there are power resources that are not associated with any devices physically present in the platform. Those power resources are expected to be turned off by the OS in accordance with the ACPI specification (section 7.3 of ACPI 6.4) which currently is not done by Linux and that may lead to obscure issues. For instance, leaving those power resources in the "on" state may prevent the platform from reaching the lowest power state in suspend-to-idle which leads to excessive power draw. For this reason, turn all of the unused ACPI power resources off at the end of the initial namespace scan for devices in analogy with resume from suspend-to-RAM. Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/device-power-management-objects.html Reported-by: David Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-22ACPI: scan: Use unique number for instance_noAndy Shevchenko1-5/+28
The decrementation of acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no in acpi_device_del() is incorrect, because it may cause a duplicate instance number to be allocated next time a device with the same acpi_device_bus_id is added. Replace above mentioned approach by using IDA framework. While at it, define the instance range to be [0, 4096). Fixes: e49bd2dd5a50 ("ACPI: use PNPID:instance_no as bus_id of ACPI device") Fixes: ca9dc8d42b30 ("ACPI / scan: Fix acpi_bus_id_list bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.10+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-19ACPI: fix various typos in commentsTom Saeger1-1/+1
Fix trivial ACPI driver comment typos. s/notifcations/notifications/ s/Ajust/Adjust/ s/preform/perform/ s/atrributes/attributes/ s/Souce/Source/ s/Evalutes/Evaluates/ s/Evalutes/Evaluates/ s/specifiy/specify/ s/promixity/proximity/ s/presuambly/presumably/ s/Evalute/Evaluate/ s/specificed/specified/ s/rountine/routine/ s/previosuly/previously/ Change comment referencing pcc_send_cmd to send_pcc_cmd. Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-02-15Merge branch 'acpi-messages'Rafael J. Wysocki1-17/+12
* acpi-messages: ACPI: OSL: Clean up printing messages ACPI: OSL: Rework acpi_check_resource_conflict() ACPI: thermal: Clean up printing messages ACPI: video: Clean up printing messages ACPI: button: Clean up printing messages ACPI: battery: Clean up printing messages ACPI: AC: Clean up printing messages ACPI: bus: Drop ACPI_BUS_COMPONENT which is not used any more ACPI: utils: Clean up printing messages ACPI: scan: Clean up printing messages ACPI: bus: Clean up printing messages ACPI: PM: Clean up printing messages ACPI: power: Clean up printing messages
2021-02-05Merge back 'acpi-scan' changes for v5.12.Rafael J. Wysocki1-50/+49
2021-02-04ACPI: scan: Clean up printing messagesRafael J. Wysocki1-17/+12
Replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in scan.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info(), respectively, and drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not used any more. While at it, drop the redundant "Memory allocation error" message from acpi_add_single_object() and clean up the list of local variables in that function. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
2021-02-01ACPI: scan: Fix battery devices sometimes never bindingHans de Goede1-5/+5
With the new 2 step scanning process, which defers instantiating some ACPI-devices based on their _DEP to the second step, the following may happen: 1. During the first acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_bus_check_add) call acpi_scan_check_dep() gets called on the Battery ACPI dev handle and adds one or more deps for this handle to the acpi_dep_list 2. During the first acpi_bus_attach() call one or more of the suppliers of these deps get their driver attached and acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier_handle) gets called. At this point acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer) get called, but since the battery has DEPs it has not been instantiated during the first acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_bus_check_add), so the acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer) call fails. Before this commit, acpi_walk_dep_device_list() would now continue *without* removing the acpi_dep_data entry for this supplier,consumer pair from the acpi_dep_list. 3. During the second acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_bus_check_add) call an acpi_device gets instantiated for the battery and acpi_scan_dep_init() gets called to initialize its dep_unmet val. Before this commit, the dep_unmet count would include DEPs for suppliers for which acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier_handle) has already been called, so it will never become 0 and the ACPI battery driver will never get attached / bind. Fix the ACPI battery driver never binding in this scenario by making acpi_walk_dep_device_list() always remove matching acpi_dep_data entries independent of the acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer) call succeeding or not. Fixes: 71da201f38df ("ACPI: scan: Defer enumeration of devices with _DEP lists") Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-01-25ACPI: scan: Rearrange code related to acpi_get_device_data()Rafael J. Wysocki1-18/+17
There are two callers of acpi_get_device_data(), acpi_bus_get_device() and acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), but only one of them takes the int return value into account. Moreover, the latter knows that it passes a valid return pointer to acpi_get_device_data() and it properly clears that pointer upfront, so it doesn't need acpi_get_device_data() to do that. For this reason, rearrange acpi_get_device_data() to return a strct acpi_device pointer instead of an int and adapt its callers to that. While at it, rename acpi_get_device_data() to handle_to_device(), because the old name does not really reflect the functionality provided by that function. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>