summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/firmware/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-01-04firmware: mtk-adsp-ipc: Convert to platform remove callback returning voidUwe Kleine-König1-4/+2
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e2ea8abb4c30190392a86cf05cecd722d0f0b493.1703693980.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-12firmware: Explicitly include correct DT includesRob Herring1-1/+0
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes. Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803-dt-header-cleanups-for-soc-v2-17-d8de2cc88bff@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2022-06-22firmware: mediatek: Use meaningful names for mboxTinghan Shen1-24/+12
Rename mbox according to actions instead of 'mbox0' and 'mbox1' Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220622062245.21021-3-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2022-05-16firmware: mediatek: Add adsp ipc protocol interfaceTingHan Shen1-0/+157
Some of mediatek processors contain the Tensilica HiFix DSP for audio processing. The communication between Host CPU and DSP firmware is taking place using a shared memory area for message passing. ADSP IPC protocol offers (send/recv) interfaces using mediatek-mailbox APIs. We use two mbox channels to implement a request-reply protocol. Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: TingHan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com> Reviewed-by: YC Hung <yc.hung@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512082215.3018-2-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>