summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-01-08drm/xe: Fix spelling mistake "gueue" -> "queue"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
There is a spelling mistake in a drm_info message. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102092014.3347566-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
2023-12-26drm/xe: Fix warning on impossible conditionLucas De Marchi1-0/+1
Having a different value for op is not possible: this is already kept out of user-visible warning by the check in xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl() if op > MAX_OP. The warning is useful as if this switch() is not update when a new op is added, it should be triggered. Fix warning as reported by 0-DAY CI Kernel: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c:46:2: warning: variable 'passed' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312170357.KPSinwPs-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs") Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231218163301.3453285-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/uapi: Return correct error code for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctlBommu Krishnaiah1-6/+24
Currently xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl is not checking exec_queue state and blocking until timeout, with this patch wakeup the blocking wait if exec_queue reset happen and returning proper error code Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com> Cc: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com> Cc: Kempczynski Zbigniew <Zbigniew.Kempczynski@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Mateusz Naklicki <mateusz.naklicki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/uapi: add exec_queue_id member to drm_xe_wait_user_fence structureBommu Krishnaiah1-63/+2
remove the num_engines/instances members from drm_xe_wait_user_fence structure and add a exec_queue_id member Right now this is only checking if the engine list is sane and nothing else. In the end every operation with this IOCTL is a soft check. So, let's formalize that and only use this IOCTL to wait on the fence. exec_queue_id member will help to user space to get proper error code from kernel while in exec_queue reset Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Mateusz Naklicki <mateusz.naklicki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/uapi: Differentiate WAIT_OP from WAIT_MASKRodrigo Vivi1-7/+7
On one hand the WAIT_OP represents the operation use for waiting such as ==, !=, > and so on. On the other hand, the mask is applied to the value used for comparision. Split those two to bring clarity to the uapi. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/uapi: Add _FLAG to uAPI constants usable for flagsFrancois Dugast1-5/+5
Most constants defined in xe_drm.h which can be used for flags are named DRM_XE_*_FLAG_*, which is helpful to identify them. Make this systematic and add _FLAG where it was missing. Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/uapi: Kill DRM_XE_UFENCE_WAIT_VM_ERRORMatthew Brost1-38/+5
This is not used nor does it align VM async document, kill this. Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: timeout needs to be a signed valueFei Yang1-18/+37
In xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl, the timeout is currently defined as unsigned long. That could potentially pass a negative value to the schedule_timeout() call because nsecs_to_jiffies() returns an unsigned long which gets used as signed long. [ 187.732238] schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value fffffffffffffc18 [ 187.733180] CPU: 0 PID: 792 Comm: test_thread_dim Tainted: G U 6.4.0-xe #1 [ 187.734251] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 187.735019] Call Trace: [ 187.735373] <TASK> [ 187.735687] dump_stack_lvl+0x92/0xb0 [ 187.736193] schedule_timeout+0x348/0x430 [ 187.736739] ? __might_fault+0x67/0xd0 [ 187.737255] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0 [ 187.737812] ? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10 [ 187.738429] ? __might_fault+0x6b/0xd0 [ 187.738946] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 [ 187.739512] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 [ 187.740080] wait_woken+0x86/0x100 [ 187.740556] xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x34b/0xe00 [xe] [ 187.741281] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 187.742075] ? lock_acquire+0x169/0x3d0 [ 187.742601] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0 [ 187.743158] ? drm_dev_enter+0x9/0xe0 [drm] [ 187.743740] ? __pfx_woken_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [ 187.744388] ? drm_dev_exit+0x11/0x50 [drm] [ 187.744969] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 [ 187.745536] ? __might_fault+0x67/0xd0 [ 187.746052] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0 [ 187.746610] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x172/0x250 [drm] [ 187.747242] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 187.748037] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl_kernel+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ 187.748729] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 187.749524] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 187.750319] drm_ioctl+0x35e/0x620 [drm] [ 187.750871] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ 187.751495] ? restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x99/0x140 [ 187.752172] ? __pfx_restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x10/0x10 [ 187.752901] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 [ 187.753438] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xb4/0xf0 [ 187.753954] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 [ 187.754450] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [ 187.755127] RIP: 0033:0x7f4e6651aaff [ 187.755623] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 [ 187.757995] RSP: 002b:00007fff05f37a50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 187.758995] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055eca47c8130 RCX: 00007f4e6651aaff [ 187.759935] RDX: 00007fff05f37b60 RSI: 00000000c050644b RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 187.760874] RBP: 0000000000000017 R08: 0000000000000017 R09: 7fffffffffffffff [ 187.761814] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 187.762753] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f4e65d19ce0 [ 187.763694] </TASK> Fixes: 5572a0046857 ("drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence") Signed-off-by: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921220500.994558-2-fei.yang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: Prefer WARN() over BUG() to avoid crashing the kernelFrancois Dugast1-1/+1
Replace calls to XE_BUG_ON() with calls XE_WARN_ON() which in turn calls WARN() instead of BUG(). BUG() crashes the kernel and should only be used when it is absolutely unavoidable in case of catastrophic and unrecoverable failures, which is not the case here. Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERRFrancois Dugast1-15/+15
Lower log level of XE_IOCTL_ERR macro to debug in order to prevent flooding kernel log. v2: Rename XE_IOCTL_ERR to XE_IOCTL_DBG (Rodrigo Vivi) v3: Rebase v4: Fix style, remove unrelated change about __FILE__ and __LINE__ Link: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-xe/2023-May/004704.html Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fenceZbigniew Kempczyński1-10/+37
Using jiffies as a timeout from userspace is weird even if theoretically exists possiblity of acquiring jiffies via getconf. Unfortunately this method is unreliable and the returned value may vary from the one configured in the kernel config. Now timeout is expressed in nanoseconds and its interpretation depends on setting DRM_XE_UFENCE_WAIT_ABSTIME flag. Relative timeout (flag is not set) means fence expire at now() + timeout. Absolute timeout (flag is set) means that the fence expires at exact point of time. Passing negative timeout means we will wait "forever" by setting wait time to MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT. Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230628055141.398036-2-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()Paulo Zanoni1-0/+3
If !no_engines, then we use copy_from_user to copy to the 'eci' array, which has XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE members. The amount of members copied is given by the user in args->num_engines, so add code to check that args->num_engines does not exceed XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE. It's an unsigned value so there's no need to check for negative values. Fixes error messages such as: Buffer overflow detected (54 < 18446744073709551520)! Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230626212221.136640-2-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPPJanga Rahul Kumar1-1/+1
ENOTSUPP is not a standard Unix error should use EOPNOTSUPP instead. v2: Update commit description (Aravind) Reviewed-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-20drm/xe: Validate uAPI padding and reserved fieldsChristopher Snowhill1-1/+2
Padding and reserved fields are declared such that they must be zeroed, so verify that they're all zero in the respective ioctl functions. Derived from original patch by mlankhorst. v2: Removed extensions checks where there were none originally. (José) Moved extraneous parentheses to the correct places. (Lucas) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-20drm/xe: Add missing include xe_wait_user_fence.hLucas De Marchi1-0/+2
Make xe_wait_user_fence.c include xe_wait_user_fence.h so it doesn't rely on indirect includes and also doesn't fail the build due to missing prototype for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl(). Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-20drm/xe: Make local functions staticLucas De Marchi1-3/+3
A few static functions not being declared like that break the build with W=1, like e.g. cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:250: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.o] Error 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c:240:6: error: no previous prototype for ‘guc_write_params’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 240 | void guc_write_params(struct xe_guc *guc) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Make them static. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-12drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUsMatthew Brost1-0/+202
Xe, is a new driver for Intel GPUs that supports both integrated and discrete platforms starting with Tiger Lake (first Intel Xe Architecture). The code is at a stage where it is already functional and has experimental support for multiple platforms starting from Tiger Lake, with initial support implemented in Mesa (for Iris and Anv, our OpenGL and Vulkan drivers), as well as in NEO (for OpenCL and Level0). The new Xe driver leverages a lot from i915. As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915 driver so that there is maximum reuse there. But it is not added in this patch. This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately the big squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits. But let's get some git quick stats so we can at least try to preserve some of the credits: Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Philippe Lecluse <philippe.lecluse@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Co-developed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Co-developed-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-07-28 15:40:21 +0300