summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-09-28mtd: rawnand: Use nanddev_get/set_ecc_requirements() when relevantMiquel Raynal1-5/+10
Instead of accessing ->strength/step_size directly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200827085208.16276-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
2019-04-18mtd: rawnand: ESMT: Also use the last page for bad block markersFrieder Schrempf1-1/+8
It is known that some ESMT SLC NANDs have been shipped with the factory bad block markers in the first or last page of the block, instead of the first or second page. To be on the safe side, let's check all three locations. Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2019-04-18mtd: nand: Make flags for bad block marker position more granularFrieder Schrempf1-1/+1
To be able to check and set bad block markers in the first and second page of a block independently of each other, we create separate flags for both cases. Previously NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE meant, that both, the first and the second page were used. With this patch NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE stands for using the first page and NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE for using the second page. This patch is only for preparation of subsequent changes and does not implement the logic to actually handle both flags separately. Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2019-04-18mtd: rawnand: Always store info about bad block markers in chip structFrieder Schrempf1-1/+1
The information about where the manufacturer puts the bad block markers inside the bad block and in the OOB data is stored in different places. Let's move this information to nand_chip.options and nand_chip.badblockpos. As this chip-specific information is not directly related to the bad block table (BBT), we also rename the flags to NAND_BBM_*. Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2019-04-08mtd: rawnand: Get rid of chip->ecc_{strength,step}_dsBoris Brezillon1-5/+5
nand_device embeds a nand_ecc_req object which contains the minimum strength and step-size required by the NAND device. Drop the chip->ecc_{strength,step}_ds fields and use chip->base.eccreq.{strength,step_size} instead. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: ESMT: retrieve ECC requirements from 5th id byteMarcel Ziswiler1-0/+47
This patch enables support to read the ECC level from the NAND flash using ESMT SLC NAND ID byte 5 information as documented e.g. in the following data sheet: https://www.esmt.com.tw/upload/pdf/ESMT/datasheets/F59L1G81LA(2Y).pdf Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>