| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Instead of using hard coded clock increment values for each SoC derive
the clock increment from the module clock. This is done in preparation
to support a second platform, R-Car V4H that uses a 200Mhz clock
compared with the 320Mhz clock used on R-Car S4.
Tested on both SoCs,
S4 reports a clock of 320000000Hz which gives a value of 0x19000000.
Documentation says a 320Mhz clock is used and the correct increment for
that clock is 0x19000000.
V4H reports a clock of 199999992Hz which gives a value of 0x2800001a.
Documentation says a 200Mhz clock is used and the correct increment for
that clock is 0x28000000.
Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
All known R-Car Gen4 SoC share the same register layout, rename the
R-Car S4 specific identifiers so they can be shared with the upcoming
R-Car V4H support.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The comments intent was to indicates which function uses the enum. While
upstreaming rcar_gen4_ptp the function was renamed but this comment was
left with the old function name.
Instead of correcting the comment remove it, it adds little value.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Add R-Car Gen4 gPTP support into the rswitch driver.
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
