summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-02-08Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds8-36/+87
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "We've got corner cases for updating i_size that ceph was hitting, error handling for quotas when we run out of space, a very subtle snapshot deletion race, a crash while removing devices, and one deadlock between subvolume creation and the sb_internal code (thanks lockdep)." * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: Btrfs: move d_instantiate outside the transaction during mksubvol Btrfs: fix EDQUOT handling in btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata Btrfs: fix possible stale data exposure Btrfs: fix missing i_size update Btrfs: fix race between snapshot deletion and getting inode Btrfs: fix missing release of the space/qgroup reservation in start_transaction() Btrfs: fix wrong sync_writers decrement in btrfs_file_aio_write() Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree btrfs: don't try to notify udev about missing devices
2013-02-06Btrfs: move d_instantiate outside the transaction during mksubvolChris Mason1-1/+4
Dave Sterba triggered a lockdep complaint about lock ordering between the sb_internal lock and the cleaner semaphore. btrfs_lookup_dentry() checks for orphans if we're looking up the inode for a subvolume, and subvolume creation is triggering the lookup with a transaction running. This commit moves the d_instantiate after the transaction closes. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix EDQUOT handling in btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadataJan Schmidt1-12/+10
When btrfs_qgroup_reserve returned a failure, we were missing a counter operation for BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++, leading to warning messages about outstanding extents and space_info->bytes_may_use != 0. Additionally, the error handling code didn't take into account that we dropped the inode lock which might require more cleanup. Luckily, all the cleanup code we need is already there and can be shared with reserve_metadata_bytes, which is exactly what this patch does. Reported-by: Lev Vainblat <lev@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git ↵Chris Mason16-119/+370
for-chris into for-linus
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix possible stale data exposureJosef Bacik1-1/+1
We specifically do not update the disk i_size if there are ordered extents outstanding for any area between the current disk_i_size and our ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is the check we have only checks if the ordered extent starts at or after the current disk_i_size, which doesn't take into account an ordered extent that starts before the current disk_i_size and ends past the disk_i_size. Fix this by checking if the extent ends past the disk_i_size. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix missing i_size updateJosef Bacik1-2/+9
If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update. So check the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need to go ahead and try to update. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix race between snapshot deletion and getting inodeLiu Bo2-9/+38
While running snapshot testscript created by Mitch and David, the race between autodefrag and snapshot deletion can lead to corruption of dead_root list so that we can get crash on btrfs_clean_old_snapshots(). And besides autodefrag, scrub also does the same thing, ie. read root first and get inode. Here is the story(take autodefrag as an example): (1) when we delete a snapshot or subvolume, it will set its root's refs to zero and do a iput() on its own inode, and if this inode happens to be the only active in-meory one in root's inode rbtree, it will add itself to the global dead_roots list for later cleanup. (2) after (1), the autodefrag thread may read another inode for defrag and the inode is just in the deleted snapshot/subvolume, but all of these are without checking if the root is still valid(refs > 0). So the end up result is adding the deleted snapshot/subvolume's root to the global dead_roots list AGAIN. Fortunately, we already have a srcu lock to avoid the race, ie. subvol_srcu. So all we need to do is to take the lock to protect 'read root and get inode', since we synchronize to wait for the rcu grace period before adding something to the global dead_roots list. Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix missing release of the space/qgroup reservation in ↵Miao Xie1-8/+19
start_transaction() When we fail to start a transaction, we need to release the reserved free space and qgroup space, fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: fix wrong sync_writers decrement in btrfs_file_aio_write()Miao Xie1-1/+2
If the checks at the beginning of btrfs_file_aio_write() fail, we needn't decrease ->sync_writers, because we have not increased it. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-06Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the treeJosef Bacik1-1/+2
You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree, but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it. The problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems. Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-01btrfs: don't try to notify udev about missing devicesEric Sandeen1-1/+2
If we remove a missing device, bdev is null, and if we send that off to btrfs_kobject_uevent we'll panic. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-25Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds14-98/+300
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "It turns out that we had two crc bugs when running fsx-linux in a loop. Many thanks to Josef, Miao Xie, and Dave Sterba for nailing it all down. Miao also has a new OOM fix in this v2 pull as well. Ilya fixed a regression Liu Bo found in the balance ioctls for pausing and resuming a running balance across drives. Josef's orphan truncate patch fixes an obscure corruption we'd see during xfstests. Arne's patches address problems with subvolume quotas. If the user destroys quota groups incorrectly the FS will refuse to mount. The rest are smaller fixes and plugs for memory leaks." * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (30 commits) Btrfs: fix repeated delalloc work allocation Btrfs: fix wrong max device number for single profile Btrfs: fix missed transaction->aborted check Btrfs: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to transaction->abort accesses Btrfs: put csums on the right ordered extent Btrfs: use right range to find checksum for compressed extents Btrfs: fix panic when recovering tree log Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removed Btrfs: fix a regression in balance usage filter Btrfs: prevent qgroup destroy when there are still relations Btrfs: ignore orphan qgroup relations Btrfs: reorder locks and sanity checks in btrfs_ioctl_defrag Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error code Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logic btrfs: update timestamps on truncate() btrfs: fix btrfs_cont_expand() freeing IS_ERR em Btrfs: fix a bug when llseek for delalloc bytes behind prealloc extents Btrfs: fix off-by-one in lseek ...
2013-01-24Btrfs: fix repeated delalloc work allocationMiao Xie1-14/+41
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/ btrfs_queue_worker for this inode, and then it locks the list, checks the head of the list again. But because we don't delete the first inode that it deals with before, it will fetch the same inode. As a result, this function allocates a huge amount of btrfs_delalloc_work structures, and OOM happens. Fix this problem by splice this delalloc list. Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: fix wrong max device number for single profileMiao Xie1-1/+1
The max device number of single profile is 1, not 0 (0 means 'as many as possible'). Fix it. Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: fix missed transaction->aborted checkMiao Xie1-0/+16
First, though the current transaction->aborted check can stop the commit early and avoid unnecessary operations, it is too early, and some transaction handles don't end, those handles may set transaction->aborted after the check. Second, when we commit the transaction, we will wake up some worker threads to flush the space cache and inode cache. Those threads also allocate some transaction handles and may set transaction->aborted if some serious error happens. So we need more check for ->aborted when committing the transaction. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to transaction->abort accessesMiao Xie2-2/+3
We may access and update transaction->aborted on the different CPUs without lock, so we need ACCESS_ONCE() wrapper to prevent the compiler from creating unsolicited accesses and make sure we can get the right value. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: put csums on the right ordered extentJosef Bacik1-2/+2
I noticed a WARN_ON going off when adding csums because we were going over the amount of csum bytes that should have been allowed for an ordered extent. This is a leftover from when we used to hold the csums privately for direct io, but now we use the normal ordered sum stuff so we need to make sure and check if we've moved on to another extent so that the csums are added to the right extent. Without this we could end up with csums for bytenrs that don't have extents to cover them yet. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: use right range to find checksum for compressed extentsLiu Bo1-0/+5
For compressed extents, the range of checksum is covered by disk length, and the disk length is different with ram length, so we need to use disk length instead to get us the right checksum. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: fix panic when recovering tree logJosef Bacik1-8/+12
A user reported a BUG_ON(ret) that occured during tree log replay. Ret was -EAGAIN, so what I think happened is that we removed an extent that covered a bitmap entry and an extent entry. We remove the part from the bitmap and return -EAGAIN and then search for the next piece we want to remove, which happens to be an entire extent entry, so we just free the sucker and return. The problem is ret is still set to -EAGAIN so we trip the BUG_ON(). The user used btrfs-zero-log so I'm not 100% sure this is what happened so I've added a WARN_ON() to catch the other possibility. Thanks, Reported-by: Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-24Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removedJosef Bacik3-3/+16
We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up our logging, or they could even remove us from the list which would keep us from logging the extent or freeing our ref on it, so we need to make sure to not clear LOGGING until after the extent is logged, and then we can merge it to adjacent extents. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-22Btrfs: fix a regression in balance usage filterIlya Dryomov1-1/+8
Commit 3fed40cc ("Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functions"), which was merged into 3.8-rc1, has introduced a regression by removing logic that was guarding us against bad user input. Bring it back. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-22Merge branch 'mutex-ops@next-for-chris' of ↵Chris Mason2-31/+86
git://github.com/idryomov/btrfs-unstable into linus
2013-01-22Merge branch 'for-chris' of ↵Chris Mason6-35/+91
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into linus
2013-01-22Btrfs: prevent qgroup destroy when there are still relationsArne Jansen1-1/+12
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other qgroups or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY. Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-22Btrfs: ignore orphan qgroup relationsArne Jansen1-0/+7
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem. With this patch, those relations are simple ignored. Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: reorder locks and sanity checks in btrfs_ioctl_defragIlya Dryomov1-8/+9
Operation-specific check (whether subvol is readonly or not) should go after the mutual exclusiveness check. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_devIlya Dryomov1-1/+1
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(). Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resizeIlya Dryomov1-1/+1
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize(). Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error codeIlya Dryomov1-4/+4
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add. Returning EINPROGRESS to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore, the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-20Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logicIlya Dryomov2-17/+71
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1 as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance, replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a complete rework, it's the best we can do. Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2013-01-14btrfs: update timestamps on truncate()Eric Sandeen1-3/+14
truncate() vs. ftruncate() differ in the VFS; truncate() doesn't set (ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME), and it's up to the fs to do the timestamp updates if the size changes. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
2013-01-14btrfs: fix btrfs_cont_expand() freeing IS_ERR emZach Brown1-0/+1
btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop. An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407 I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors (ENOMEM, EIO; whatever). This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: fix a bug when llseek for delalloc bytes behind prealloc extentsLiu Bo2-6/+14
xfstests case 285 complains. It it because btrfs did not try to find unwritten delalloc bytes(only dirty pages, not yet writeback) behind prealloc extents, it ends up finding nothing while we're with SEEK_DATA. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: fix off-by-one in lseekLiu Bo1-0/+1
Lock end is inclusive. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: reset path lock state to zeroLiu Bo1-0/+2
We forgot to reset the path lock state to zero after we unlock the path block, and this can lead to the ASSERT checker in tree unlock API. Reported-by: Slava Barinov <rayslava@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: let allocation start from the right raid typeLiu Bo1-1/+1
This'd avoid us empty looping. Say we have only one disk and the metadata raid type will be defaultly DUP, and we do not need to start from index=0(RAID10) and get over two empty loops to index=2(DUP). Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: add orphan before truncating pagecacheJosef Bacik1-15/+38
Running xfstests 83 in a loop would sometimes fail the fsck. This happens because if we invalidate a page that already has an ordered extent setup for it we will complete the ordered extent ourselves, assuming that the truncate will clean everything up. The problem with this is there is plenty of time for the truncate to fail after we've done this work. So to fix this we need to add the orphan item first to make sure the cleanup gets done properly, and then we can truncate the pagecache and all that stuff and be safe. This fixes the btrfsck failures I was seeing while running 83 in a loop. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: set flushing if we're limited flushingJosef Bacik1-1/+1
We still need to say we're flushing if we're limit flushing to keep somebody from coming in and stealing our reservation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: fix missing write access release in btrfs_ioctl_resize()Miao Xie1-0/+1
We forget to give up the write access after we find some device operation is going on. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: fix resize a readonly deviceMiao Xie1-2/+4
We should not resize a readonly device, fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: do not delete a subvolume which is in a R/O subvolumeMiao Xie1-5/+5
Step to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs <disk> # mount <disk> <mnt> # btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv0 # btrfs sub snap <mnt> <mnt>/subv0/snap0 # change <mnt>/subv0 from R/W to R/O # btrfs sub del <mnt>/subv0/snap0 We deleted the snapshot successfully. I think we should not be able to delete the snapshot since the parent subvolume is R/O. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: disable qgroup id 0Miao Xie1-0/+5
Qgroup id 0 is a special number, we should set the id of a qgroup to 0. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-14btrfs: get the device in write mode when deleting itLukas Czerner1-1/+1
When we're deleting the device we should get it in write mode since we're going to re-write the super block magic on that device. And it should fail if the device is read-only. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
2013-01-14Btrfs: fix memory leak in name_cache_insert()Tsutomu Itoh1-1/+3
We should free name_cache_entry before returning from the error handling code. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
2012-12-21Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-15/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs Pull VFS update from Al Viro: "fscache fixes, ESTALE patchset, vmtruncate removal series, assorted misc stuff." * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (79 commits) vfs: make lremovexattr retry once on ESTALE error vfs: make removexattr retry once on ESTALE vfs: make llistxattr retry once on ESTALE error vfs: make listxattr retry once on ESTALE error vfs: make lgetxattr retry once on ESTALE vfs: make getxattr retry once on an ESTALE error vfs: allow lsetxattr() to retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: allow setxattr to retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: allow utimensat() calls to retry once on an ESTALE error vfs: fix user_statfs to retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: make fchownat retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: make fchmodat retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: have chroot retry once on ESTALE error vfs: have chdir retry lookup and call once on ESTALE error vfs: have faccessat retry once on an ESTALE error vfs: have do_sys_truncate retry once on an ESTALE error vfs: fix renameat to retry on ESTALE errors vfs: make do_unlinkat retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: make do_rmdir retry once on ESTALE errors vfs: add a flags argument to user_path_parent ...
2012-12-21Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-8/+6
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull two btrfs reverts from Chris Mason: "I had missed that for two of the patches in my last pull, we had included different fixes during 3.7." * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: Revert "Btrfs: reorder tree mod log operations in deleting a pointer" Revert "Btrfs: MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING never change node's nritems"
2012-12-20vfs: remove DCACHE_NEED_LOOKUPJeff Layton1-15/+1
The code that relied on that flag was ripped out of btrfs quite some time ago, and never added back. Josef indicated that he was going to take a different approach to the problem in btrfs, and that we could just eliminate this flag. Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-12-19Revert "Btrfs: reorder tree mod log operations in deleting a pointer"Chris Mason1-6/+4
This reverts commit 6a7a665d78c5dd8bc76a010648c4e7d84517ab5a. This was bug was fixed differently in 3.6, so this commit isn't needed. Conflicts: fs/btrfs/ctree.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-19Revert "Btrfs: MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING never change node's nritems"Chris Mason1-2/+2
This reverts commit 95c80bb1f6b24b57058d971ed252b2c1c5121b51. The bug addressed by this commit was fixed differently back in 3.6 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-18Merge branch 'for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds42-1745/+5255
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs Pull btrfs update from Chris Mason: "A big set of fixes and features. In terms of line count, most of the code comes from Stefan, who added the ability to replace a single drive in place. This is different from how btrfs normally replaces drives, and is much much much faster. Josef is plowing through our synchronous write performance. This pull request does not include the DIO_OWN_WAITING patch that was discussed on the list, but it has a number of other improvements to cut down our latencies and CPU time during fsync/O_DIRECT writes. Miao Xie has a big series of fixes and is spreading out ordered operations over more CPUs. This improves performance and reduces contention. I've put in fixes for error handling around hash collisions. These are going back to individual stable kernels as I test against them. Otherwise we have a lot of fixes and cleanups, thanks everyone! raid5/6 is being rebased against the device replacement code. I'll have it posted this Friday along with a nice series of benchmarks." * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (115 commits) Btrfs: fix a bug of per-file nocow Btrfs: fix hash overflow handling Btrfs: don't take inode delalloc mutex if we're a free space inode Btrfs: fix autodefrag and umount lockup Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask Btrfs: put raid properties into global table Btrfs: fix BUG() in scrub when first superblock reading gives EIO Btrfs: do not call file_update_time in aio_write Btrfs: only unlock and relock if we have to Btrfs: use tokens where we can in the tree log Btrfs: optimize leaf_space_used Btrfs: don't memset new tokens Btrfs: only clear dirty on the buffer if it is marked as dirty Btrfs: move checks in set_page_dirty under DEBUG Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map tree Btrfs: add path->really_keep_locks Btrfs: do not mark ems as prealloc if we are writing to them Btrfs: keep track of the extents original block length Btrfs: inline csums if we're fsyncing Btrfs: don't bother copying if we're only logging the inode ...
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-08-15 23:51:11 +0300