summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-04-24Merge tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of ↵Linus Torvalds11-229/+573
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux Pull RCU updates from Joel Fernandes: - Updates and additions to MAINTAINERS files, with Boqun being added to the RCU entry and Zqiang being added as an RCU reviewer. I have also transitioned from reviewer to maintainer; however, Paul will be taking over sending RCU pull-requests for the next merge window. - Resolution of hotplug warning in nohz code, achieved by fixing cpu_is_hotpluggable() through interaction with the nohz subsystem. Tick dependency modifications by Zqiang, focusing on fixing usage of the TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask. - Avoid needless calls to the rcu-lazy shrinker for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n kernels, fixed by Zqiang. - Improvements to rcu-tasks stall reporting by Neeraj. - Initial renaming of k[v]free_rcu() to k[v]free_rcu_mightsleep() for increased robustness, affecting several components like mac802154, drbd, vmw_vmci, tracing, and more. A report by Eric Dumazet showed that the API could be unknowingly used in an atomic context, so we'd rather make sure they know what they're asking for by being explicit: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202052847.2623997-1-edumazet@google.com/ - Documentation updates, including corrections to spelling, clarifications in comments, and improvements to the srcu_size_state comments. - Better srcu_struct cache locality for readers, by adjusting the size of srcu_struct in support of SRCU usage by Christoph Hellwig. - Teach lockdep to detect deadlocks between srcu_read_lock() vs synchronize_srcu() contributed by Boqun. Previously lockdep could not detect such deadlocks, now it can. - Integration of rcutorture and rcu-related tools, targeted for v6.4 from Boqun's tree, featuring new SRCU deadlock scenarios, test_nmis module parameter, and more - Miscellaneous changes, various code cleanups and comment improvements * tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux: (71 commits) checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used mac802154: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() ext4/super: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() net/mlx5: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() net/sysctl: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() lib/test_vmalloc.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() tracing: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() misc: vmw_vmci: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() drbd: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-ed rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan() rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp() rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernels rcu: Fix missing TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU_EXP dependency check rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race rcu/trace: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy() tick/nohz: Fix cpu_is_hotpluggable() by checking with nohz subsystem ...
2023-04-06rcu/kvfree: Avoid freeing new kfree_rcu() memory after old grace periodZiwei Dai1-8/+19
Memory passed to kvfree_rcu() that is to be freed is tracked by a per-CPU kfree_rcu_cpu structure, which in turn contains pointers to kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structures that contain pointers to memory that has not yet been handed to RCU, along with an kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure that tracks the memory that has already been handed to RCU. These structures track three categories of memory: (1) Memory for kfree(), (2) Memory for kvfree(), and (3) Memory for both that arrived during an OOM episode. The first two categories are tracked in a cache-friendly manner involving a dynamically allocated page of pointers (the aforementioned kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structures), while the third uses a simple (but decidedly cache-unfriendly) linked list through the rcu_head structures in each block of memory. On a given CPU, these three categories are handled as a unit, with that CPU's kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure having one pointer for each of the three categories. Clearly, new memory for a given category cannot be placed in the corresponding kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure until any old memory has had its grace period elapse and thus has been removed. And the kfree_rcu_monitor() function does in fact check for this. Except that the kfree_rcu_monitor() function checks these pointers one at a time. This means that if the previous kfree_rcu() memory passed to RCU had only category 1 and the current one has only category 2, the kfree_rcu_monitor() function will send that current category-2 memory along immediately. This can result in memory being freed too soon, that is, out from under unsuspecting RCU readers. To see this, consider the following sequence of events, in which: o Task A on CPU 0 calls rcu_read_lock(), then uses "from_cset", then is preempted. o CPU 1 calls kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head) in order to free "from_cset" after a later grace period. Except that "from_cset" is freed right after the previous grace period ended, so that "from_cset" is immediately freed. Task A resumes and references "from_cset"'s member, after which nothing good happens. In full detail: CPU 0 CPU 1 ---------------------- ---------------------- count_memcg_event_mm() |rcu_read_lock() <--- |mem_cgroup_from_task() |// css_set_ptr is the "from_cset" mentioned on CPU 1 |css_set_ptr = rcu_dereference((task)->cgroups) |// Hard irq comes, current task is scheduled out. cgroup_attach_task() |cgroup_migrate() |cgroup_migrate_execute() |css_set_move_task(task, from_cset, to_cset, true) |cgroup_move_task(task, to_cset) |rcu_assign_pointer(.., to_cset) |... |cgroup_migrate_finish() |put_css_set_locked(from_cset) |from_cset->refcount return 0 |kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head) // free from_cset after new gp |add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock() |schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, ..) kfree_rcu_monitor() |krcp->bulk_head[0]'s work attached to krwp->bulk_head_free[] |queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work) |if rwork->rcu.work is not in WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT state, |call_rcu(&rwork->rcu, rcu_work_rcufn) <--- request new gp // There is a perious call_rcu(.., rcu_work_rcufn) // gp end, rcu_work_rcufn() is called. rcu_work_rcufn() |__queue_work(.., rwork->wq, &rwork->work); |kfree_rcu_work() |krwp->bulk_head_free[0] bulk is freed before new gp end!!! |The "from_cset" is freed before new gp end. // the task resumes some time later. |css_set_ptr->subsys[(subsys_id) <--- Caused kernel crash, because css_set_ptr is freed. This commit therefore causes kfree_rcu_monitor() to refrain from moving kfree_rcu() memory to the kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure until the RCU grace period has completed for all three categories. v2: Use helper function instead of inserted code block at kfree_rcu_monitor(). Fixes: 34c881745549 ("rcu: Support kfree_bulk() interface in kfree_rcu()") Fixes: 5f3c8d620447 ("rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs") Reported-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Ziwei Dai <ziwei.dai@unisoc.com> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Tested-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-05Merge branches 'rcu/staging-core', 'rcu/staging-docs' and ↵Joel Fernandes (Google)8-213/+519
'rcu/staging-kfree', remote-tracking branches 'paul/srcu-cf.2023.04.04a', 'fbq/rcu/lockdep.2023.03.27a' and 'fbq/rcu/rcutorture.2023.03.20a' into rcu/staging
2023-04-05rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)1-1/+1
The kfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu() macros' single-argument forms are deprecated. Therefore switch to the new kfree_rcu_mightsleep() and kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() variants. The goal is to avoid accidental use of the single-argument forms, which can introduce functionality bugs in atomic contexts and latency bugs in non-atomic contexts. Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks accessZqiang1-2/+4
For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can result in a NULL-pointer dereference: CPU1 CPU2 rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore rcu_print_task_exp_stall if (special.b.blocked) READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL raw_spin_lock_rcu_node np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp) if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks) WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np) .... raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry) (if rnp->exp_tasks is NULL, this will dereference a NULL pointer) The problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks field without holding the rcu_node structure's ->lock and CPU2 did not observe CPU1's change to rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks in time. Therefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks pointer to NULL, then CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer. This commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure's ->lock while accessing that structure's->exp_tasks field. [ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ] Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-edZheng Yejian1-0/+1
Registering a kprobe on __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() can cause kernel stack overflow as shown below. This issue can be reproduced by enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL and booting the kernel with argument "nohz_full=", and then giving the following commands at the shell prompt: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # echo 'p:mp1 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick' >> kprobe_events # echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable This commit therefore adds __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() to the kprobes blacklist using NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Insufficient stack space to handle exception! ESR: 0x00000000f2000004 -- BRK (AArch64) FAR: 0x0000ffffccf3e510 Task stack: [0xffff80000ad30000..0xffff80000ad38000] IRQ stack: [0xffff800008050000..0xffff800008058000] Overflow stack: [0xffff089c36f9f310..0xffff089c36fa0310] CPU: 5 PID: 190 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-00320-g1f5abbd77e2c #19 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 400003c5 (nZcv DAIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 lr : ct_nmi_enter+0x11c/0x138 sp : ffff80000ad30080 x29: ffff80000ad30080 x28: ffff089c82e20000 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff089c02a8d100 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: 00000000400003c5 x22: 0000ffffccf3e510 x21: ffff089c36fae148 x20: ffff80000ad30120 x19: ffffa8da8fcce148 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffa8da8e44ea6c x14: ffffa8da8e44e968 x13: ffffa8da8e03136c x12: 1fffe113804d6809 x11: ffff6113804d6809 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : dfff800000000000 x8 : ffff089c026b404f x7 : 00009eec7fb297f7 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff80000ad30120 x4 : dfff800000000000 x3 : ffffa8da8e3016f4 x2 : 0000000000000003 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow CPU: 5 PID: 190 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-00320-g1f5abbd77e2c #19 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x108 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 panic+0x214/0x404 add_taint+0x0/0xf8 panic_bad_stack+0x144/0x160 handle_bad_stack+0x38/0x58 __bad_stack+0x78/0x7c __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 arm64_enter_el1_dbg.isra.0+0x14/0x20 el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 arm64_enter_el1_dbg.isra.0+0x14/0x20 el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 arm64_enter_el1_dbg.isra.0+0x14/0x20 el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 [...] el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 arm64_enter_el1_dbg.isra.0+0x14/0x20 el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 arm64_enter_el1_dbg.isra.0+0x14/0x20 el1_dbg+0x2c/0x90 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe8 el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick+0x0/0x1b8 el1_interrupt+0x28/0x60 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28 el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 __ftrace_set_clr_event_nolock+0x98/0x198 __ftrace_set_clr_event+0x58/0x80 system_enable_write+0x144/0x178 vfs_write+0x174/0x738 ksys_write+0xd0/0x188 __arm64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 invoke_syscall+0x64/0x180 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x84/0x160 do_el0_svc+0x48/0xe8 el0_svc+0x34/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 SMP: stopping secondary CPUs Kernel Offset: 0x28da86000000 from 0xffff800008000000 PHYS_OFFSET: 0xfffff76600000000 CPU features: 0x00000,01a00100,0000421b Memory Limit: none Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221119040049.795065-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/ Fixes: aaf2bc50df1f ("rcu: Abstract out rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from rcu_nmi_enter()") Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan()Neeraj Upadhyay1-0/+31
The call to synchronize_srcu() from rcu_tasks_postscan() can be stalled by a task getting stuck in do_exit() between that function's calls to exit_tasks_rcu_start() and exit_tasks_rcu_finish(). To ease diagnosis of this situation, print a stall warning message every rcu_task_stall_info period when rcu_tasks_postscan() is stalled. [ paulmck: Adjust to handle CONFIG_SMP=n. ] Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20230111212736.GA1062057@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/ Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked earlyZqiang2-5/+5
According to the commit log of the patch that added it to the kernel, start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() can be invoked very early, as in long before rcu_init() has been invoked. But before rcu_init(), the rcu_data structure's ->mynode field has not yet been initialized. This means that the start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() function's attempt to set the CPU's leaf rcu_node structure's ->exp_seq_poll_rq field will result in a segmentation fault. This commit therefore causes start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to set ->exp_seq_poll_rq only after rcu_init() has initialized all CPUs' rcu_data structures' ->mynode fields. It also removes the check from the rcu_init() function so that start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited( is unconditionally invoked. Yes, this might result in an unnecessary boot-time grace period, but this is down in the noise. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp()Zqiang1-4/+6
The rcu_accelerate_cbs() function is invoked by rcu_report_qs_rdp() only if there is a grace period in progress that is still blocked by at least one CPU on this rcu_node structure. This means that rcu_accelerate_cbs() should never return the value true, and thus that this function should never set the needwake variable and in turn never invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake(). This commit therefore removes the needwake variable and the invocation of rcu_gp_kthread_wake() in favor of a WARN_ON_ONCE() on the call to rcu_accelerate_cbs(). The purpose of this new WARN_ON_ONCE() is to detect situations where the system's opinion differs from ours. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernelsZqiang1-0/+4
The lazy_rcu_shrink_count() shrinker function is registered even in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n, in which case this function uselessly consumes cycles learning that no CPU has any lazy callbacks queued. This commit therefore registers this shrinker function only in the kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y, where it might actually do something useful. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask raceZqiang1-2/+3
For kernels built with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, the following scenario can result in the scheduling-clock interrupt remaining enabled on a holdout CPU after its quiescent state has been reported: CPU1 CPU2 rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait acquires rnp->lock mask = rnp->expmask; for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask) rnp->expmask = rnp->expmask & ~mask; rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu1); for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask) rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu1); if (!rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp) continue; rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = true; tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu1, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP); The problem is that CPU2's sampling of rnp->expmask is obsolete by the time it invokes tick_dep_set_cpu(), and CPU1 is not guaranteed to see CPU2's store to ->rcu_forced_tick_exp in time to clear it. And even if CPU1 does see that store, it might invoke tick_dep_clear_cpu() before CPU2 got around to executing its tick_dep_set_cpu(), which would still leave the victim CPU with its scheduler-clock tick running. Either way, an nohz_full real-time application running on the victim CPU would have its latency needlessly degraded. Note that expedited RCU grace periods look at context-tracking information, and so if the CPU is executing in nohz_full usermode throughout, that CPU cannot be victimized in this manner. This commit therefore causes synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait to hold the rcu_node structure's ->lock when checking for holdout CPUs, setting TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP, and invoking tick_dep_set_cpu(), thus preventing this race. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Remove CONFIG_SRCUPaul E. McKenney1-3/+0
Now that all references to CONFIG_SRCU have been removed, it is time to remove CONFIG_SRCU itself. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Add comment to rcu_do_batch() identifying rcuoc code pathPaul E. McKenney1-0/+2
This commit adds a comment to help explain why the "else" clause of the in_serving_softirq() "if" statement does not need to enforce a time limit. The reason is that this "else" clause handles rcuoc kthreads that do not block handlers for other softirq vectors. Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05srcu: Clarify comments on memory barrier "E"Joel Fernandes (Google)1-7/+27
There is an smp_mb() named "E" in srcu_flip() immediately before the increment (flip) of the srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_idx. The purpose of E is to order the preceding scan's read of lock counters against the flipping of the ->srcu_idx, in order to prevent new readers from continuing to use the old ->srcu_idx value, which might needlessly extend the grace period. However, this ordering is already enforced because of the control dependency between the preceding scan and the ->srcu_idx flip. This control dependency exists because atomic_long_read() is used to scan the counts, because WRITE_ONCE() is used to flip ->srcu_idx, and because ->srcu_idx is not flipped until the ->srcu_lock_count[] and ->srcu_unlock_count[] counts match. And such a match cannot happen when there is an in-flight reader that started before the flip (observation courtesy Mathieu Desnoyers). The litmus test below (courtesy of Frederic Weisbecker, with changes for ctrldep by Boqun and Joel) shows this: C srcu (* * bad condition: P0's first scan (SCAN1) saw P1's idx=0 LOCK count inc, though P1 saw flip. * * So basically, the ->po ordering on both P0 and P1 is enforced via ->ppo * (control deps) on both sides, and both P0 and P1 are interconnected by ->rf * relations. Combining the ->ppo with ->rf, a cycle is impossible. *) {} // updater P0(int *IDX, int *LOCK0, int *UNLOCK0, int *LOCK1, int *UNLOCK1) { int lock1; int unlock1; int lock0; int unlock0; // SCAN1 unlock1 = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK1); smp_mb(); // A lock1 = READ_ONCE(*LOCK1); // FLIP if (lock1 == unlock1) { // Control dep smp_mb(); // E // Remove E and still passes. WRITE_ONCE(*IDX, 1); smp_mb(); // D // SCAN2 unlock0 = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK0); smp_mb(); // A lock0 = READ_ONCE(*LOCK0); } } // reader P1(int *IDX, int *LOCK0, int *UNLOCK0, int *LOCK1, int *UNLOCK1) { int tmp; int idx1; int idx2; // 1st reader idx1 = READ_ONCE(*IDX); if (idx1 == 0) { // Control dep tmp = READ_ONCE(*LOCK0); WRITE_ONCE(*LOCK0, tmp + 1); smp_mb(); /* B and C */ tmp = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK0); WRITE_ONCE(*UNLOCK0, tmp + 1); } else { tmp = READ_ONCE(*LOCK1); WRITE_ONCE(*LOCK1, tmp + 1); smp_mb(); /* B and C */ tmp = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK1); WRITE_ONCE(*UNLOCK1, tmp + 1); } } exists (0:lock1=1 /\ 1:idx1=1) More complicated litmus tests with multiple SRCU readers also show that memory barrier E is not needed. This commit therefore clarifies the comment on memory barrier E. Why not also remove that redundant smp_mb()? Because control dependencies are quite fragile due to their not being recognized by most compilers and tools. Control dependencies therefore exact an ongoing maintenance burden, and such a burden cannot be justified in this slowpath. Therefore, that smp_mb() stays until such time as its overhead becomes a measurable problem in a real workload running on a real production system, or until such time as compilers start paying attention to this sort of control dependency. Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Further comment and explain the state space of GP sequencesFrederic Weisbecker1-0/+37
The state space of the GP sequence number isn't documented and the definitions of its special values are scattered. This commit therefore gathers some common knowledge near the grace-period sequence-number definitions. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_funnel_gp_start()Paul E. McKenney1-13/+14
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_gp_end()Paul E. McKenney1-20/+21
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Fix long lines in cleanup_srcu_struct()Paul E. McKenney1-10/+11
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_get_delay()Paul E. McKenney1-5/+6
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code. Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Check for readers at module-exit timePaul E. McKenney1-1/+2
If a given statically allocated in-module srcu_struct structure was ever used for updates, srcu_module_going() will invoke cleanup_srcu_struct() at module-exit time. This will check for the error case of SRCU readers persisting past module-exit time. On the other hand, if this srcu_struct structure never went through a grace period, srcu_module_going() only invokes free_percpu(), which would result in strange failures if SRCU readers persisted past module-exit time. This commit therefore adds a srcu_readers_active() check to srcu_module_going(), splatting if readers have persisted and refraining from invoking free_percpu() in that case. Better to leak memory than to suffer silent memory corruption! [ paulmck: Apply Zhang, Qiang1 feedback on memory leak. ] Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move work-scheduling fields from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-19/+22
This commit moves the ->reschedule_jiffies, ->reschedule_count, and ->work fields from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. However, this means that the container_of() calls cannot get a pointer to the srcu_struct because they are no longer in the srcu_struct. This issue is addressed by adding a ->srcu_ssp field in the srcu_usage structure that references the corresponding srcu_struct structure. And given the presence of the sup pointer to the srcu_usage structure, replace some ssp->srcu_usage-> instances with sup->. [ paulmck Apply feedback from kernel test robot. ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191400.iO5BOqka-lkp@intel.com/ Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move srcu_barrier() fields from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-19/+19
This commit moves the ->srcu_barrier_seq, ->srcu_barrier_mutex, ->srcu_barrier_completion, and ->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt fields from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->sda_is_static from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-4/+4
This commit moves the ->sda_is_static field from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move heuristics fields from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-9/+9
This commit moves the ->srcu_size_jiffies, ->srcu_n_lock_retries, and ->srcu_n_exp_nodelay fields from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move grace-period fields from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-64/+64
This commit moves the ->srcu_gp_seq, ->srcu_gp_seq_needed, ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, ->srcu_gp_start, and ->srcu_last_gp_end fields from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->srcu_gp_mutex from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-7/+7
This commit moves the ->srcu_gp_mutex field from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->lock from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-28/+28
This commit moves the ->lock field from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->lock initialization after srcu_usage allocationPaul E. McKenney1-2/+2
Currently, both __init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y kernels and init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n kernel initialize the srcu_struct structure's ->lock before the srcu_usage structure has been allocated. This of course prevents the ->lock from being moved to the srcu_usage structure, so this commit moves the initialization into the init_srcu_struct_fields() after the srcu_usage structure has been allocated. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->srcu_cb_mutex from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-3/+3
This commit moves the ->srcu_cb_mutex field from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->srcu_size_state from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-18/+19
This commit moves the ->srcu_size_state field from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Move ->level from srcu_struct to srcu_usagePaul E. McKenney1-7/+7
This commit moves the ->level[] array from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Begin offloading srcu_struct fields to srcu_updatePaul E. McKenney2-11/+23
The current srcu_struct structure is on the order of 200 bytes in size (depending on architecture and .config), which is much better than the old-style 26K bytes, but still all too inconvenient when one is trying to achieve good cache locality on a fastpath involving SRCU readers. However, only a few fields in srcu_struct are used by SRCU readers. The remaining fields could be offloaded to a new srcu_update structure, thus shrinking the srcu_struct structure down to a few tens of bytes. This commit begins this noble quest, a quest that is complicated by open-coded initialization of the srcu_struct within the srcu_notifier_head structure. This complication is addressed by updating the srcu_notifier_head structure's open coding, given that there does not appear to be a straightforward way of abstracting that initialization. This commit moves only the ->node pointer to srcu_update. Later commits will move additional fields. [ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com's memory-leak fix. ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230320055751.4120251-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/ Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04srcu: Use static init for statically allocated in-module srcu_structPaul E. McKenney1-6/+13
Further shrinking the srcu_struct structure is eased by requiring that in-module srcu_struct structures rely more heavily on static initialization. In particular, this preserves the property that a module-load-time srcu_struct initialization can fail only due to memory-allocation failure of the per-CPU srcu_data structures. It might also slightly improve robustness by keeping the number of memory allocations that must succeed down percpu_alloc() call. This is in preparation for splitting an srcu_usage structure out of the srcu_struct structure. [ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com feedback. ] Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-04rcu-tasks: Fix warning for unused tasks_rcu_exit_srcuPaul E. McKenney1-0/+2
The tasks_rcu_exit_srcu variable is used only by kernels built with CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=y, but is defined for all kernesl with CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC=y. Therefore, in kernels built with CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC=y but CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=n, this gives a "defined but not used" warning. This commit therefore moves this variable under CONFIG_TASKS_RCU. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191536.XzMSyzTl-lkp@intel.com/ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-03-27rcutorture: Add RCU Tasks Trace and SRCU deadlock scenariosPaul E. McKenney1-1/+35
Add a test number 3 that creates deadlock cycles involving one RCU Tasks Trace step and L-1 SRCU steps. Please note that lockdep will not detect these deadlocks until synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() is marked with lockdep's new "sync" annotation, which will probably not happen until some time after these markings prove their worth on SRCU. Please note that these tests are available only in kernels built with CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU=y. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-27rcutorture: Add SRCU deadlock scenariosPaul E. McKenney1-0/+151
In order to test the new SRCU-lockdep functionality, this commit adds an rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep module parameter that, when non-zero, selects an SRCU deadlock scenario to execute. This parameter is a five-digit number formatted as DNNL, where "D" is 1 to force a deadlock and 0 to avoid doing so; "NN" is the test number, 0 for SRCU-based, 1 for SRCU/mutex-based, and 2 for SRCU/rwsem-based; and "L" is the number of steps in the deadlock cycle. Note that rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep=1 will also force a hard hang. If a non-zero value of rcutorture.test_srcu_lockdep does not select a deadlock scenario, a console message is printed and testing continues. [ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback, add rwsem support. ] [ paulmck: Apply Dan Carpenter feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-27rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependenciesBoqun Feng2-0/+4
Although all flavors of RCU readers are annotated correctly with lockdep as recursive read locks, they do not set the lock_acquire 'check' parameter. This means that RCU read locks are not added to the lockdep dependency graph, which in turn means that lockdep cannot detect RCU-based deadlocks. This is not a problem for RCU flavors having atomic read-side critical sections because context-based annotations can catch these deadlocks, see for example the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() statement in synchronize_rcu(). But context-based annotations are not helpful for sleepable RCU, especially given that it is perfectly legal to do synchronize_srcu(&srcu1) within an srcu_read_lock(&srcu2). However, we can detect SRCU-based by: (1) Making srcu_read_lock() a 'check'ed recursive read lock and (2) Making synchronize_srcu() a empty write lock critical section. Even better, with the newly introduced lock_sync(), we can avoid false positives about irq-unsafe/safe. This commit therefore makes it so. Note that NMI-safe SRCU read side critical sections are currently not annotated, but might be annotated in the future. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> [ boqun: Add comments for annotation per Waiman's suggestion ] [ boqun: Fix comment warning reported by Stephen Rothwell ] Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-20refscale: Move shutdown from wait_event() to wait_event_idle()Paul E. McKenney1-1/+1
The ref_scale_shutdown() kthread/function uses wait_event() to wait for the refscale test to complete. However, although the read-side tests are normally extremely fast, there is no law against specifying a very large value for the refscale.loops module parameter or against having a slow read-side primitive. Either way, this might well trigger the hung-task timeout. This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-20rcuscale: Move shutdown from wait_event() to wait_event_idle()Paul E. McKenney1-4/+3
The rcu_scale_shutdown() and kfree_scale_shutdown() kthreads/functions use wait_event() to wait for the rcuscale test to complete. However, each updater thread in such a test waits for at least 100 grace periods. If each grace period takes more than 1.2 seconds, which is long, but not insanely so, this can trigger the hung-task timeout. This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout. Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com> Reported-by: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-20rcutorture: Create nocb kthreads only when testing rcu in ↵Zqiang1-0/+6
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y kernels Given a non-zero rcutorture.nocbs_nthreads module parameter, the specified number of nocb kthreads will be created, regardless of whether or not the RCU implementation under test is capable of offloading callbacks. Please note that even vanilla RCU is incapable of offloading in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n. And when the RCU implementation is incapable of offloading callbacks, there is no point in creating those kthreads. This commit therefore checks the cur_ops.torture_type module parameter and CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU Kconfig option in order to avoid creating unnecessary nocb tasks. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> [ boqun: Fix checkpatch warning ] Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-12rcutorture: Eliminate variable n_rcu_torture_boost_rterrorYue Hu1-8/+3
After commit 8b700983de82 ("sched: Remove sched_set_*() return value"), this variable is not used anymore. So eliminate it entirely. Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-03-12rcutorture: Add test_nmis module parameterPaul E. McKenney1-2/+30
This commit adds a test_nmis module parameter to generate the specified number of NMI stack backtraces 15 seconds apart. This module parameter can be used to test NMI delivery and accompanying diagnostics. Note that this parameter is ignored when rcutorture is a module rather than built into the kernel. This could be changed with the addition of an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). [ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-02-03Merge branch 'stall.2023.01.09a' into HEADPaul E. McKenney6-4/+88
stall.2023.01.09a: RCU CPU stall-warning updates.
2023-02-03Merge branches 'doc.2023.01.05a', 'fixes.2023.01.23a', 'kvfree.2023.01.03a', ↵Paul E. McKenney11-352/+842
'srcu.2023.01.03a', 'srcu-always.2023.02.02a', 'tasks.2023.01.03a', 'torture.2023.01.05a' and 'torturescript.2023.01.03a' into HEAD doc.2023.01.05a: Documentation update. fixes.2023.01.23a: Miscellaneous fixes. kvfree.2023.01.03a: kvfree_rcu() updates. srcu.2023.01.03a: SRCU updates. srcu-always.2023.02.02a: Finish making SRCU be unconditionally available. tasks.2023.01.03a: Tasks-RCU updates. torture.2023.01.05a: Torture-test updates. torturescript.2023.01.03a: Torture-test scripting updates.
2023-01-24rcu: Disable laziness if lazy-tracking says soJoel Fernandes (Google)1-1/+3
During suspend, we see failures to suspend 1 in 300-500 suspends. Looking closer, it appears that asynchronous RCU callbacks are being queued as lazy even though synchronous callbacks are expedited. These delays appear to not be very welcome by the suspend/resume code as evidenced by these occasional suspend failures. This commit modifies call_rcu() to check if rcu_async_should_hurry(), which will return true if we are in suspend or in-kernel boot. [ paulmck: Alphabetize local variables. ] Ignoring the lazy hint makes the 3000 suspend/resume cycles pass reliably on a 12th gen 12-core Intel CPU, and there is some evidence that it also slightly speeds up boot performance. Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power") Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-18rcu: Track laziness during boot and suspendJoel Fernandes (Google)3-1/+47
Boot and suspend/resume should not be slowed down in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y. In particular, suspend can sometimes fail in such kernels. This commit therefore adds rcu_async_hurry(), rcu_async_relax(), and rcu_async_should_hurry() functions that track whether or not either a boot or a suspend/resume operation is in progress. This will enable a later commit to refrain from laziness during those times. Export rcu_async_should_hurry(), rcu_async_hurry(), and rcu_async_relax() for later use by rcutorture. [ paulmck: Apply feedback from Steve Rostedt. ] Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power") Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-12rcu: Remove redundant call to rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity()Zqiang1-5/+0
The rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() function is invoked at rcutree_online_cpu() and rcutree_offline_cpu() time, early in the online timeline and late in the offline timeline, respectively. It is also invoked from rcutree_dead_cpu(), however, in the absence of userspace manipulations (for which userspace must take responsibility), this call is redundant with that from rcutree_offline_cpu(). This redundancy can be demonstrated by printing out the relevant cpumasks This commit therefore removes the call to rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() from rcutree_dead_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2023-01-09rcu: Allow up to five minutes expedited RCU CPU stall-warning timeoutsPaul E. McKenney2-2/+2
The maximum value of RCU CPU stall-warning timeouts has historically been five minutes (300 seconds). However, the recently introduced expedited RCU CPU stall-warning timeout is instead limited to 21 seconds. This causes problems for CI/fuzzing services such as syzkaller by obscuring the issue in question with expedited RCU CPU stall-warning timeout splats. This commit therefore sets the RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT Kconfig options upper bound to 300000 milliseconds, which is 300 seconds (AKA 5 minutes). [ paulmck: Apply feedback from Hillf Danton. ] [ paulmck: Apply feedback from Geert Uytterhoeven. ] Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-05rcu: Align the output of RCU CPU stall warning messagesZhen Lei1-2/+2
Time stamps are added to the output in kernels built with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y, which causes misaligned output. Therefore, replace pr_cont() with pr_err(), which fixes alignment and gets rid of a couple of despised pr_cont() calls. Before: [ 37.567343] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 37.567839] rcu: 0-....: (1500 ticks this GP) idle=*** [ 37.568270] (t=1501 jiffies g=4717 q=28 ncpus=4) [ 37.568668] CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: test0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4 #8 After: [ 36.762074] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 36.762543] rcu: 0-....: (1499 ticks this GP) idle=*** [ 36.763003] rcu: (t=1500 jiffies g=5097 q=27 ncpus=4) [ 36.763522] CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: test0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4 #9 Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-05rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis informationZhen Lei6-0/+84
Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning messages. On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts, that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can produce misleading diagnostics. The stack traces will show the innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are at the very least exacerbating the stall. This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts and the CPU time that they have consumed. Diagnosing other types of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context switches and the task-level CPU time consumed. Consider the following output given this change: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted> rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system rcu: number: 624 45 0 rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms) This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small, there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled. The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls. This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>