summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-05-11bpf, x86: Generate trampolines from bpf_tramp_linksKui-Feng Lee1-5/+19
Replace struct bpf_tramp_progs with struct bpf_tramp_links to collect struct bpf_tramp_link(s) for a trampoline. struct bpf_tramp_link extends bpf_link to act as a linked list node. arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() accepts a struct bpf_tramp_links to collects all bpf_tramp_link(s) that a trampoline should call. Change BPF trampoline and bpf_struct_ops to pass bpf_tramp_links instead of bpf_tramp_progs. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220510205923.3206889-2-kuifeng@fb.com
2022-01-27bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel wayYonghong Song1-2/+4
BPF verifier supports direct memory access for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING type of bpf programs, e.g., a->b. If "a" is a pointer pointing to kernel memory, bpf verifier will allow user to write code in C like a->b and the verifier will translate it to a kernel load properly. If "a" is a pointer to user memory, it is expected that bpf developer should be bpf_probe_read_user() helper to get the value a->b. Without utilizing BTF __user tagging information, current verifier will assume that a->b is a kernel memory access and this may generate incorrect result. Now BTF contains __user information, it can check whether the pointer points to a user memory or not. If it is, the verifier can reject the program and force users to use bpf_probe_read_user() helper explicitly. In the future, we can easily extend btf_add_space for other address space tagging, for example, rcu/percpu etc. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154606.654961-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-11-02bpf: Add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purposeHou Tao1-0/+200
Currently the test of BPF STRUCT_OPS depends on the specific bpf implementation of tcp_congestion_ops, but it can not cover all basic functionalities (e.g, return value handling), so introduce a dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose. Loading a bpf_dummy_ops implementation from userspace is prohibited, and its only purpose is to run BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS program through bpf(BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Now programs for test_1() & test_2() are supported. The following three cases are exercised in bpf_dummy_struct_ops_test_run(): (1) test and check the value returned from state arg in test_1(state) The content of state is copied from userspace pointer and copied back after calling test_1(state). The user pointer is saved in an u64 array and the array address is passed through ctx_in. (2) test and check the return value of test_1(NULL) Just simulate the case in which an invalid input argument is passed in. (3) test multiple arguments passing in test_2(state, ...) 5 arguments are passed through ctx_in in form of u64 array. The first element of array is userspace pointer of state and others 4 arguments follow. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-4-houtao1@huawei.com