summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/dsa/switch.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-07-26net: dsa: fix reference counting for LAG FDBsVladimir Oltean1-0/+1
Due to an invalid conflict resolution on my side while working on 2 different series (LAG FDBs and FDB isolation), dsa_switch_do_lag_fdb_add() does not store the database associated with a dsa_mac_addr structure. So after adding an FDB entry associated with a LAG, dsa_mac_addr_find() fails to find it while deleting it, because &a->db is zeroized memory for all stored FDB entries of lag->fdbs, and dsa_switch_do_lag_fdb_del() returns -ENOENT rather than deleting the entry. Fixes: c26933639b54 ("net: dsa: request drivers to perform FDB isolation") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220723012411.1125066-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-05-13net: dsa: remove port argument from ->change_tag_protocol()Vladimir Oltean1-6/+4
DSA has not supported (and probably will not support in the future either) independent tagging protocols per CPU port. Different switch drivers have different requirements, some may need to replicate some settings for each CPU port, some may need to apply some settings on a single CPU port, while some may have to configure some global settings and then some per-CPU-port settings. In any case, the current model where DSA calls ->change_tag_protocol for each CPU port turns out to be impractical for drivers where there are global things to be done. For example, felix calls dsa_tag_8021q_register(), which makes no sense per CPU port, so it suppresses the second call. Let drivers deal with replication towards all CPU ports, and remove the CPU port argument from the function prototype. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-04-20net: dsa: don't emit targeted cross-chip notifiers for MTU changeVladimir Oltean1-13/+1
A cross-chip notifier with "targeted_match=true" is one that matches only the local port of the switch that emitted it. In other words, passing through the cross-chip notifier layer serves no purpose. Eliminate this concept by calling directly ds->ops->port_change_mtu instead of emitting a targeted cross-chip notifier. This leaves the DSA_NOTIFIER_MTU event being emitted only for MTU updates on the CPU port, which need to be reflected also across all DSA links. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-04-20net: dsa: make cross-chip notifiers more efficient for host eventsVladimir Oltean1-70/+48
To determine whether a given port should react to the port targeted by the notifier, dsa_port_host_vlan_match() and dsa_port_host_address_match() look at the positioning of the switch port currently executing the notifier relative to the switch port for which the notifier was emitted. To maintain stylistic compatibility with the other match functions from switch.c, the host address and host VLAN match functions take the notifier information about targeted port, switch and tree indices as argument. However, these functions only use that information to retrieve the struct dsa_port *targeted_dp, which is an invariant for the outer loop that calls them. So it makes more sense to calculate the targeted dp only once, and pass it to them as argument. But furthermore, the targeted dp is actually known at the time the call to dsa_port_notify() is made. It is just that we decide to only save the indices of the port, switch and tree in the notifier structure, just to retrace our steps and find the dp again using dsa_switch_find() and dsa_to_port(). But both the above functions are relatively expensive, since they need to iterate through lists. It appears more straightforward to make all notifiers just pass the targeted dp inside their info structure, and have the code that needs the indices to look at info->dp->index instead of info->port, or info->dp->ds->index instead of info->sw_index, or info->dp->ds->dst->index instead of info->tree_index. For the sake of consistency, all cross-chip notifiers are converted to pass the "dp" directly. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-04-20net: dsa: move reset of VLAN filtering to dsa_port_switchdev_unsync_attrsVladimir Oltean1-58/+0
In dsa_port_switchdev_unsync_attrs() there is a comment that resetting the VLAN filtering isn't done where it is expected. And since commit 108dc8741c20 ("net: dsa: Avoid cross-chip syncing of VLAN filtering"), there is no reason to handle this in switch.c either. Therefore, move the logic to port.c, and adapt it slightly to the data structures and naming conventions from there. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-03-09net: dsa: felix: avoid early deletion of host FDB entriesVladimir Oltean1-18/+0
The Felix driver declares FDB isolation but puts all standalone ports in VID 0. This is mostly problem-free as discussed with Alvin here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220302191417.1288145-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/#24763870 however there is one catch. DSA still thinks that FDB entries are installed on the CPU port as many times as there are user ports, and this is problematic when multiple user ports share the same MAC address. Consider the default case where all user ports inherit their MAC address from the DSA master, and then the user runs: ip link set swp0 address 00:01:02:03:04:05 The above will make dsa_slave_set_mac_address() call dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add() for 00:01:02:03:04:05 in port 0's standalone database, and dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_del() for the old address of swp0, again in swp0's standalone database. Both the ->port_fdb_add() and ->port_fdb_del() will be propagated down to the felix driver, which will end up deleting the old MAC address from the CPU port. But this is still in use by other user ports, so we end up breaking unicast termination for them. There isn't a problem in the fact that DSA keeps track of host standalone addresses in the individual database of each user port: some drivers like sja1105 need this. There also isn't a problem in the fact that some drivers choose the same VID/FID for all standalone ports. It is just that the deletion of these host addresses must be delayed until they are known to not be in use any longer, and only the driver has this knowledge. Since DSA keeps these addresses in &cpu_dp->fdbs and &cpu_db->mdbs, it is just a matter of walking over those lists and see whether the same MAC address is present on the CPU port in the port db of another user port. I have considered reusing the generic dsa_port_walk_fdbs() and dsa_port_walk_mdbs() schemes for this, but locking makes it difficult. In the ->port_fdb_add() method and co, &dp->addr_lists_lock is held, but dsa_port_walk_fdbs() also acquires that lock. Also, even assuming that we introduce an unlocked variant of the address iterator, we'd still need some relatively complex data structures, and a void *ctx in the dsa_fdb_walk_cb_t which we don't currently pass, such that drivers are able to figure out, after iterating, whether the same MAC address is or isn't present in the port db of another port. All the above, plus the fact that I expect other drivers to follow the same model as felix where all standalone ports use the same FID, made me conclude that a generic method provided by DSA is necessary: dsa_fdb_present_in_other_db() and the mdb equivalent. Felix calls this from the ->port_fdb_del() handler for the CPU port, when the database was classified to either a port db, or a LAG db. For symmetry, we also call this from ->port_fdb_add(), because if the address was installed once, then installing it a second time serves no purpose: it's already in hardware in VID 0 and it affects all standalone ports. This change moves dsa_db_equal() from switch.c to dsa.c, since it now has one more caller. Fixes: 54c319846086 ("net: mscc: ocelot: enforce FDB isolation when VLAN-unaware") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: pass extack to .port_bridge_join driver methodsVladimir Oltean1-2/+4
As FDB isolation cannot be enforced between VLAN-aware bridges in lack of hardware assistance like extra FID bits, it seems plausible that many DSA switches cannot do it. Therefore, they need to reject configurations with multiple VLAN-aware bridges from the two code paths that can transition towards that state: - joining a VLAN-aware bridge - toggling VLAN awareness on an existing bridge The .port_vlan_filtering method already propagates the netlink extack to the driver, let's propagate it from .port_bridge_join too, to make sure that the driver can use the same function for both. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: request drivers to perform FDB isolationVladimir Oltean1-35/+64
For DSA, to encourage drivers to perform FDB isolation simply means to track which bridge does each FDB and MDB entry belong to. It then becomes the driver responsibility to use something that makes the FDB entry from one bridge not match the FDB lookup of ports from other bridges. The top-level functions where the bridge is determined are: - dsa_port_fdb_{add,del} - dsa_port_host_fdb_{add,del} - dsa_port_mdb_{add,del} - dsa_port_host_mdb_{add,del} aka the pre-crosschip-notifier functions. Changing the API to pass a reference to a bridge is not superfluous, and looking at the passed bridge argument is not the same as having the driver look at dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge from the ->port_fdb_add() method. DSA installs FDB and MDB entries on shared (CPU and DSA) ports as well, and those do not have any dp->bridge information to retrieve, because they are not in any bridge - they are merely the pipes that serve the user ports that are in one or multiple bridges. The struct dsa_bridge associated with each FDB/MDB entry is encapsulated in a larger "struct dsa_db" database. Although only databases associated to bridges are notified for now, this API will be the starting point for implementing IFF_UNICAST_FLT in DSA. There, the idea is to install FDB entries on the CPU port which belong to the corresponding user port's port database. These are supposed to match only when the port is standalone. It is better to introduce the API in its expected final form than to introduce it for bridges first, then to have to change drivers which may have made one or more assumptions. Drivers can use the provided bridge.num, but they can also use a different numbering scheme that is more convenient. DSA must perform refcounting on the CPU and DSA ports by also taking into account the bridge number. So if two bridges request the same local address, DSA must notify the driver twice, once for each bridge. In fact, if the driver supports FDB isolation, DSA must perform refcounting per bridge, but if the driver doesn't, DSA must refcount host addresses across all bridges, otherwise it would be telling the driver to delete an FDB entry for a bridge and the driver would delete it for all bridges. So introduce a bool fdb_isolation in drivers which would make all bridge databases passed to the cross-chip notifier have the same number (0). This makes dsa_mac_addr_find() -> dsa_db_equal() say that all bridge databases are the same database - which is essentially the legacy behavior. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridgingVladimir Oltean1-2/+2
For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25net: dsa: support FDB events on offloaded LAG interfacesVladimir Oltean1-0/+109
This change introduces support for installing static FDB entries towards a bridge port that is a LAG of multiple DSA switch ports, as well as support for filtering towards the CPU local FDB entries emitted for LAG interfaces that are bridge ports. Conceptually, host addresses on LAG ports are identical to what we do for plain bridge ports. Whereas FDB entries _towards_ a LAG can't simply be replicated towards all member ports like we do for multicast, or VLAN. Instead we need new driver API. Hardware usually considers a LAG to be a "logical port", and sets the entire LAG as the forwarding destination. The physical egress port selection within the LAG is made by hashing policy, as usual. To represent the logical port corresponding to the LAG, we pass by value a copy of the dsa_lag structure to all switches in the tree that have at least one port in that LAG. To illustrate why a refcounted list of FDB entries is needed in struct dsa_lag, it is enough to say that: - a LAG may be a bridge port and may therefore receive FDB events even while it isn't yet offloaded by any DSA interface - DSA interfaces may be removed from a LAG while that is a bridge port; we don't want FDB entries lingering around, but we don't want to remove entries that are still in use, either For all the cases below to work, the idea is to always keep an FDB entry on a LAG with a reference count equal to the DSA member ports. So: - if a port joins a LAG, it requests the bridge to replay the FDB, and the FDB entries get created, or their refcount gets bumped by one - if a port leaves a LAG, the FDB replay deletes or decrements refcount by one - if an FDB is installed towards a LAG with ports already present, that entry is created (if it doesn't exist) and its refcount is bumped by the amount of ports already present in the LAG echo "Adding FDB entry to bond with existing ports" ip link del bond0 ip link add bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad ip link set swp1 down && ip link set swp1 master bond0 && ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 down && ip link set swp2 master bond0 && ip link set swp2 up ip link del br0 ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set bond0 master br0 bridge fdb add dev bond0 00:01:02:03:04:05 master static ip link del br0 ip link del bond0 echo "Adding FDB entry to empty bond" ip link del bond0 ip link add bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad ip link del br0 ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set bond0 master br0 bridge fdb add dev bond0 00:01:02:03:04:05 master static ip link set swp1 down && ip link set swp1 master bond0 && ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 down && ip link set swp2 master bond0 && ip link set swp2 up ip link del br0 ip link del bond0 echo "Adding FDB entry to empty bond, then removing ports one by one" ip link del bond0 ip link add bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad ip link del br0 ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set bond0 master br0 bridge fdb add dev bond0 00:01:02:03:04:05 master static ip link set swp1 down && ip link set swp1 master bond0 && ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 down && ip link set swp2 master bond0 && ip link set swp2 up ip link set swp1 nomaster ip link set swp2 nomaster ip link del br0 ip link del bond0 Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-02-25net: dsa: create a dsa_lag structureVladimir Oltean1-4/+4
The main purpose of this change is to create a data structure for a LAG as seen by DSA. This is similar to what we have for bridging - we pass a copy of this structure by value to ->port_lag_join and ->port_lag_leave. For now we keep the lag_dev, id and a reference count in it. Future patches will add a list of FDB entries for the LAG (these also need to be refcounted to work properly). The LAG structure is created using dsa_port_lag_create() and destroyed using dsa_port_lag_destroy(), just like we have for bridging. Because now, the dsa_lag itself is refcounted, we can simplify dsa_lag_map() and dsa_lag_unmap(). These functions need to keep a LAG in the dst->lags array only as long as at least one port uses it. The refcounting logic inside those functions can be removed now - they are called only when we should perform the operation. dsa_lag_dev() is renamed to dsa_lag_by_id() and now returns the dsa_lag structure instead of the lag_dev net_device. dsa_lag_foreach_port() now takes the dsa_lag structure as argument. dst->lags holds an array of dsa_lag structures. dsa_lag_map() now also saves the dsa_lag->id value, so that linear walking of dst->lags in drivers using dsa_lag_id() is no longer necessary. They can just look at lag.id. dsa_port_lag_id_get() is a helper, similar to dsa_port_bridge_num_get(), which can be used by drivers to get the LAG ID assigned by DSA to a given port. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-02-25net: dsa: rename references to "lag" as "lag_dev"Vladimir Oltean1-4/+4
In preparation of converting struct net_device *dp->lag_dev into a struct dsa_lag *dp->lag, we need to rename, for consistency purposes, all occurrences of the "lag" variable in the DSA core to "lag_dev". Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-02-16net: dsa: add explicit support for host bridge VLANsVladimir Oltean1-7/+180
Currently, DSA programs VLANs on shared (DSA and CPU) ports each time it does so on user ports. This is good for basic functionality but has several limitations: - the VLAN group which must reach the CPU may be radically different from the VLAN group that must be autonomously forwarded by the switch. In other words, the admin may want to isolate noisy stations and avoid traffic from them going to the control processor of the switch, where it would just waste useless cycles. The bridge already supports independent control of VLAN groups on bridge ports and on the bridge itself, and when VLAN-aware, it will drop packets in software anyway if their VID isn't added as a 'self' entry towards the bridge device. - Replaying host FDB entries may depend, for some drivers like mv88e6xxx, on replaying the host VLANs as well. The 2 VLAN groups are approximately the same in most regular cases, but there are corner cases when timing matters, and DSA's approximation of replicating VLANs on shared ports simply does not work. - If a user makes the bridge (implicitly the CPU port) join a VLAN by accident, there is no way for the CPU port to isolate itself from that noisy VLAN except by rebooting the system. This is because for each VLAN added on a user port, DSA will add it on shared ports too, but for each VLAN deletion on a user port, it will remain installed on shared ports, since DSA has no good indication of whether the VLAN is still in use or not. Now that the bridge driver emits well-balanced SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN addition and removal events, DSA has a simple and straightforward task of separating the bridge port VLANs (these have an orig_dev which is a DSA slave interface, or a LAG interface) from the host VLANs (these have an orig_dev which is a bridge interface), and to keep a simple reference count of each VID on each shared port. Forwarding VLANs must be installed on the bridge ports and on all DSA ports interconnecting them. We don't have a good view of the exact topology, so we simply install forwarding VLANs on all DSA ports, which is what has been done until now. Host VLANs must be installed primarily on the dedicated CPU port of each bridge port. More subtly, they must also be installed on upstream-facing and downstream-facing DSA ports that are connecting the bridge ports and the CPU. This ensures that the mv88e6xxx's problem (VID of host FDB entry may be absent from VTU) is still addressed even if that switch is in a cross-chip setup, and it has no local CPU port. Therefore: - user ports contain only bridge port (forwarding) VLANs, and no refcounting is necessary - DSA ports contain both forwarding and host VLANs. Refcounting is necessary among these 2 types. - CPU ports contain only host VLANs. Refcounting is also necessary. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-02net: dsa: provide switch operations for tracking the master stateVladimir Oltean1-0/+15
Certain drivers may need to send management traffic to the switch for things like register access, FDB dump, etc, to accelerate what their slow bus (SPI, I2C, MDIO) can already do. Ethernet is faster (especially in bulk transactions) but is also more unreliable, since the user may decide to bring the DSA master down (or not bring it up), therefore severing the link between the host and the attached switch. Drivers needing Ethernet-based register access already should have fallback logic to the slow bus if the Ethernet method fails, but that fallback may be based on a timeout, and the I/O to the switch may slow down to a halt if the master is down, because every Ethernet packet will have to time out. The driver also doesn't have the option to turn off Ethernet-based I/O momentarily, because it wouldn't know when to turn it back on. Which is where this change comes in. By tracking NETDEV_CHANGE, NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_GOING_DOWN events on the DSA master, we should know the exact interval of time during which this interface is reliably available for traffic. Provide this information to switches so they can use it as they wish. An helper is added dsa_port_master_is_operational() to check if a master port is operational. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-01-25net: dsa: Avoid cross-chip syncing of VLAN filteringTobias Waldekranz1-3/+5
Changes to VLAN filtering are not applicable to cross-chip notifications. On a system like this: .-----. .-----. .-----. | sw1 +---+ sw2 +---+ sw3 | '-1-2-' '-1-2-' '-1-2-' Before this change, upon sw1p1 leaving a bridge, a call to dsa_port_vlan_filtering would also be made to sw2p1 and sw3p1. In this scenario: .---------. .-----. .-----. | sw1 +---+ sw2 +---+ sw3 | '-1-2-3-4-' '-1-2-' '-1-2-' When sw1p4 would leave a bridge, dsa_port_vlan_filtering would be called for sw2 and sw3 with a non-existing port - leading to array out-of-bounds accesses and crashes on mv88e6xxx. Fixes: d371b7c92d19 ("net: dsa: Unset vlan_filtering when ports leave the bridge") Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-01-25net: dsa: Move VLAN filtering syncing out of dsa_switch_bridge_leaveTobias Waldekranz1-13/+25
Most of dsa_switch_bridge_leave was, in fact, dealing with the syncing of VLAN filtering for switches on which that is a global setting. Separate the two phases to prepare for the cross-chip related bugfix in the following commit. Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-01-05net: dsa: remove cross-chip support for HSRVladimir Oltean1-24/+0
The cross-chip notifiers for HSR are bypass operations, meaning that even though all switches in a tree are notified, only the switch specified in the info structure is targeted. We can eliminate the unnecessary complexity by deleting the cross-chip notifier logic and calling the ds->ops straight from port.c. Cc: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-01-05net: dsa: remove cross-chip support for MRPVladimir Oltean1-64/+0
The cross-chip notifiers for MRP are bypass operations, meaning that even though all switches in a tree are notified, only the switch specified in the info structure is targeted. We can eliminate the unnecessary complexity by deleting the cross-chip notifier logic and calling the ds->ops straight from port.c. Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-01-05net: dsa: fix incorrect function pointer check for MRP ring rolesVladimir Oltean1-2/+2
The cross-chip notifier boilerplate code meant to check the presence of ds->ops->port_mrp_add_ring_role before calling it, but checked ds->ops->port_mrp_add instead, before calling ds->ops->port_mrp_add_ring_role. Therefore, a driver which implements one operation but not the other would trigger a NULL pointer dereference. There isn't any such driver in DSA yet, so there is no reason to backport the change. Issue found through code inspection. Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Fixes: c595c4330da0 ("net: dsa: add MRP support") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-12-14net: dsa: make tagging protocols connect to individual switches from a treeVladimir Oltean1-3/+49
On the NXP Bluebox 3 board which uses a multi-switch setup with sja1105, the mechanism through which the tagger connects to the switch tree is broken, due to improper DSA code design. At the time when tag_ops->connect() is called in dsa_port_parse_cpu(), DSA hasn't finished "touching" all the ports, so it doesn't know how large the tree is and how many ports it has. It has just seen the first CPU port by this time. As a result, this function will call the tagger's ->connect method too early, and the tagger will connect only to the first switch from the tree. This could be perhaps addressed a bit more simply by just moving the tag_ops->connect(dst) call a bit later (for example in dsa_tree_setup), but there is already a design inconsistency at present: on the switch side, the notification is on a per-switch basis, but on the tagger side, it is on a per-tree basis. Furthermore, the persistent storage itself is per switch (ds->tagger_data). And the tagger connect and disconnect procedures (at least the ones that exist currently) could see a fair bit of simplification if they didn't have to iterate through the switches of a tree. To fix the issue, this change transforms tag_ops->connect(dst) into tag_ops->connect(ds) and moves it somewhere where we already iterate over all switches of a tree. That is in dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(), which is a good placement because we already have there the connection call to the switch side of things. As for the dsa_tree_bind_tag_proto() method (called from the code path that changes the tag protocol), things are a bit more complicated because we receive the tree as argument, yet when we unwind on errors, it would be nice to not call tag_ops->disconnect(ds) where we didn't previously call tag_ops->connect(ds). We didn't have this problem before because the tag_ops connection operations passed the entire dst before, and this is more fine grained now. To solve the error rewind case using the new API, we have to create yet one more cross-chip notifier for disconnection, and stay connected with the old tag protocol to all the switches in the tree until we've succeeded to connect with the new one as well. So if something fails half way, the whole tree is still connected to the old tagger. But there may still be leaks if the tagger fails to connect to the 2nd out of 3 switches in a tree: somebody needs to tell the tagger to disconnect from the first switch. Nothing comes for free, and this was previously handled privately by the tagging protocol driver before, but now we need to emit a disconnect cross-chip notifier for that, because DSA has to take care of the unwind path. We assume that the tagging protocol has connected to a switch if it has set ds->tagger_data to something, otherwise we avoid calling its disconnection method in the error rewind path. The rest of the changes are in the tagging protocol drivers, and have to do with the replacement of dst with ds. The iteration is removed and the error unwind path is simplified, as mentioned above. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-12-12net: dsa: introduce tagger-owned storage for private and shared dataVladimir Oltean1-0/+14
Ansuel is working on register access over Ethernet for the qca8k switch family. This requires the qca8k tagging protocol driver to receive frames which aren't intended for the network stack, but instead for the qca8k switch driver itself. The dp->priv is currently the prevailing method for passing data back and forth between the tagging protocol driver and the switch driver. However, this method is riddled with caveats. The DSA design allows in principle for any switch driver to return any protocol it desires in ->get_tag_protocol(). The dsa_loop driver can be modified to do just that. But in the current design, the memory behind dp->priv has to be allocated by the switch driver, so if the tagging protocol is paired to an unexpected switch driver, we may end up in NULL pointer dereferences inside the kernel, or worse (a switch driver may allocate dp->priv according to the expectations of a different tagger). The latter possibility is even more plausible considering that DSA switches can dynamically change tagging protocols in certain cases (dsa <-> edsa, ocelot <-> ocelot-8021q), and the current design lends itself to mistakes that are all too easy to make. This patch proposes that the tagging protocol driver should manage its own memory, instead of relying on the switch driver to do so. After analyzing the different in-tree needs, it can be observed that the required tagger storage is per switch, therefore a ds->tagger_data pointer is introduced. In principle, per-port storage could also be introduced, although there is no need for it at the moment. Future changes will replace the current usage of dp->priv with ds->tagger_data. We define a "binding" event between the DSA switch tree and the tagging protocol. During this binding event, the tagging protocol's ->connect() method is called first, and this may allocate some memory for each switch of the tree. Then a cross-chip notifier is emitted for the switches within that tree, and they are given the opportunity to fix up the tagger's memory (for example, they might set up some function pointers that represent virtual methods for consuming packets). Because the memory is owned by the tagger, there exists a ->disconnect() method for the tagger (which is the place to free the resources), but there doesn't exist a ->disconnect() method for the switch driver. This is part of the design. The switch driver should make minimal use of the public part of the tagger data, and only after type-checking it using the supplied "proto" argument. In the code there are in fact two binding events, one is the initial event in dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(). At this stage, the cross chip notifier chains aren't initialized, so we call each switch's connect() method by hand. Then there is dsa_tree_bind_tag_proto() during dsa_tree_change_tag_proto(), and here we have an old protocol and a new one. We first connect to the new one before disconnecting from the old one, to simplify error handling a bit and to ensure we remain in a valid state at all times. Co-developed-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-12-09net: dsa: add a "tx_fwd_offload" argument to ->port_bridge_joinVladimir Oltean1-1/+2
This is a preparation patch for the removal of the DSA switch methods ->port_bridge_tx_fwd_offload() and ->port_bridge_tx_fwd_unoffload(). The plan is for the switch to report whether it offloads TX forwarding directly as a response to the ->port_bridge_join() method. This change deals with the noisy portion of converting all existing function prototypes to take this new boolean pointer argument. The bool is placed in the cross-chip notifier structure for bridge join, and a reference to it is provided to drivers. In the next change, DSA will then actually look at this value instead of calling ->port_bridge_tx_fwd_offload(). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-09net: dsa: keep the bridge_dev and bridge_num as part of the same structureVladimir Oltean1-6/+7
The main desire behind this is to provide coherent bridge information to the fast path without locking. For example, right now we set dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num from separate code paths, it is theoretically possible for a packet transmission to read these two port properties consecutively and find a bridge number which does not correspond with the bridge device. Another desire is to start passing more complex bridge information to dsa_switch_ops functions. For example, with FDB isolation, it is expected that drivers will need to be passed the bridge which requested an FDB/MDB entry to be offloaded, and along with that bridge_dev, the associated bridge_num should be passed too, in case the driver might want to implement an isolation scheme based on that number. We already pass the {bridge_dev, bridge_num} pair to the TX forwarding offload switch API, however we'd like to remove that and squash it into the basic bridge join/leave API. So that means we need to pass this pair to the bridge join/leave API. During dsa_port_bridge_leave, first we unset dp->bridge_dev, then we call the driver's .port_bridge_leave with what used to be our dp->bridge_dev, but provided as an argument. When bridge_dev and bridge_num get folded into a single structure, we need to preserve this behavior in dsa_port_bridge_leave: we need a copy of what used to be in dp->bridge. Switch drivers check bridge membership by comparing dp->bridge_dev with the provided bridge_dev, but now, if we provide the struct dsa_bridge as a pointer, they cannot keep comparing dp->bridge to the provided pointer, since this only points to an on-stack copy. To make this obvious and prevent driver writers from forgetting and doing stupid things, in this new API, the struct dsa_bridge is provided as a full structure (not very large, contains an int and a pointer) instead of a pointer. An explicit comparison function needs to be used to determine bridge membership: dsa_port_offloads_bridge(). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-09net: dsa: hide dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num in the core behind helpersVladimir Oltean1-4/+2
The location of the bridge device pointer and number is going to change. It is not going to be kept individually per port, but in a common structure allocated dynamically and which will have lockdep validation. Create helpers to access these elements so that we have a migration path to the new organization. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-25net: dsa: introduce locking for the address lists on CPU and DSA portsVladimir Oltean1-24/+52
Now that the rtnl_mutex is going away for dsa_port_{host_,}fdb_{add,del}, no one is serializing access to the address lists that DSA keeps for the purpose of reference counting on shared ports (CPU and cascade ports). It can happen for one dsa_switch_do_fdb_del to do list_del on a dp->fdbs element while another dsa_switch_do_fdb_{add,del} is traversing dp->fdbs. We need to avoid that. Currently dp->mdbs is not at risk, because dsa_switch_do_mdb_{add,del} still runs under the rtnl_mutex. But it would be nice if it would not depend on that being the case. So let's introduce a mutex per port (the address lists are per port too) and share it between dp->mdbs and dp->fdbs. The place where we put the locking is interesting. It could be tempting to put a DSA-level lock which still serializes calls to .port_fdb_{add,del}, but it would still not avoid concurrency with other driver code paths that are currently under rtnl_mutex (.port_fdb_dump, .port_fast_age). So it would add a very false sense of security (and adding a global switch-wide lock in DSA to resynchronize with the rtnl_lock is also counterproductive and hard). So the locking is intentionally done only where the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists are traversed. That means, from a driver perspective, that .port_fdb_add will be called with the dp->addr_lists_lock mutex held on the CPU port, but not held on user ports. This is done so that driver writers are not encouraged to rely on any guarantee offered by dp->addr_lists_lock. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-25net: dsa: avoid refcount warnings when ->port_{fdb,mdb}_del returns errorVladimir Oltean1-2/+2
At present, when either of ds->ops->port_fdb_del() or ds->ops->port_mdb_del() return a non-zero error code, we attempt to save the day and keep the data structure associated with that switchdev object, as the deletion procedure did not complete. However, the way in which we do this is suspicious to the checker in lib/refcount.c, who thinks it is buggy to increment a refcount that became zero, and that this is indicative of a use-after-free. Fixes: 161ca59d39e9 ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-25Revert "Merge branch 'dsa-rtnl'"David S. Miller1-52/+24
This reverts commit 965e6b262f48257dbdb51b565ecfd84877a0ab5f, reversing changes made to 4d98bb0d7ec2d0b417df6207b0bafe1868bad9f8.
2021-10-24net: dsa: introduce locking for the address lists on CPU and DSA portsVladimir Oltean1-24/+52
Now that the rtnl_mutex is going away for dsa_port_{host_,}fdb_{add,del}, no one is serializing access to the address lists that DSA keeps for the purpose of reference counting on shared ports (CPU and cascade ports). It can happen for one dsa_switch_do_fdb_del to do list_del on a dp->fdbs element while another dsa_switch_do_fdb_{add,del} is traversing dp->fdbs. We need to avoid that. Currently dp->mdbs is not at risk, because dsa_switch_do_mdb_{add,del} still runs under the rtnl_mutex. But it would be nice if it would not depend on that being the case. So let's introduce a mutex per port (the address lists are per port too) and share it between dp->mdbs and dp->fdbs. The place where we put the locking is interesting. It could be tempting to put a DSA-level lock which still serializes calls to .port_fdb_{add,del}, but it would still not avoid concurrency with other driver code paths that are currently under rtnl_mutex (.port_fdb_dump, .port_fast_age). So it would add a very false sense of security (and adding a global switch-wide lock in DSA to resynchronize with the rtnl_lock is also counterproductive and hard). So the locking is intentionally done only where the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists are traversed. That means, from a driver perspective, that .port_fdb_add will be called with the dp->addr_lists_lock mutex held on the CPU port, but not held on user ports. This is done so that driver writers are not encouraged to rely on any guarantee offered by dp->addr_lists_lock. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-21net: dsa: convert cross-chip notifiers to iterate using dpVladimir Oltean1-60/+69
The majority of cross-chip switch notifiers need to filter in some way over the type of ports: some install VLANs etc on all cascade ports. The difference is that the matching function, which filters by port type, is separate from the function where the iteration happens. So this patch needs to refactor the matching functions' prototypes as well, to take the dp as argument. In a future patch/series, I might convert dsa_towards_port to return a struct dsa_port *dp too, but at the moment it is a bit entangled with dsa_routing_port which is also used by mv88e6xxx and they both return an int port. So keep dsa_towards_port the way it is and convert it into a dp using dsa_to_port. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-21net: dsa: remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern from the coreVladimir Oltean1-23/+17
Ever since Vivien's conversion of the ds->ports array into a dst->ports list, and the introduction of dsa_to_port, iterations through the ports of a switch became quadratic whenever dsa_to_port was needed. dsa_to_port can either be called directly, or indirectly through the dsa_is_{user,cpu,dsa,unused}_port helpers. Use the newly introduced dsa_switch_for_each_port() iteration macro that works with the iterator variable being a struct dsa_port *dp directly, and not an int i. It is an expensive variable to go from i to dp, but cheap to go from dp to i. This macro iterates through the entire ds->dst->ports list and filters by the ports belonging just to the switch provided as argument. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-13net: dsa: fix spurious error message when unoffloaded port leaves bridgeAlvin Šipraga1-1/+1
Flip the sign of a return value check, thereby suppressing the following spurious error: port 2 failed to notify DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_LEAVE: -EOPNOTSUPP ... which is emitted when removing an unoffloaded DSA switch port from a bridge. Fixes: d371b7c92d19 ("net: dsa: Unset vlan_filtering when ports leave the bridge") Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012112730.3429157-1-alvin@pqrs.dk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-08-24net: dsa: let drivers state that they need VLAN filtering while standaloneVladimir Oltean1-5/+16
As explained in commit e358bef7c392 ("net: dsa: Give drivers the chance to veto certain upper devices"), the hellcreek driver uses some tricks to comply with the network stack expectations: it enforces port separation in standalone mode using VLANs. For untagged traffic, bridging between ports is prevented by using different PVIDs, and for VLAN-tagged traffic, it never accepts 8021q uppers with the same VID on two ports, so packets with one VLAN cannot leak from one port to another. That is almost fine*, and has worked because hellcreek relied on an implicit behavior of the DSA core that was changed by the previous patch: the standalone ports declare the 'rx-vlan-filter' feature as 'on [fixed]'. Since most of the DSA drivers are actually VLAN-unaware in standalone mode, that feature was actually incorrectly reflecting the hardware/driver state, so there was a desire to fix it. This leaves the hellcreek driver in a situation where it has to explicitly request this behavior from the DSA framework. We configure the ports as follows: - Standalone: 'rx-vlan-filter' is on. An 8021q upper on top of a standalone hellcreek port will go through dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid and will add a VLAN to the hardware tables, giving the driver the opportunity to refuse it through .port_prechangeupper. - Bridged with vlan_filtering=0: 'rx-vlan-filter' is off. An 8021q upper on top of a bridged hellcreek port will not go through dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid, because there will not be any attempt to offload this VLAN. The driver already disables VLAN awareness, so that upper should receive the traffic it needs. - Bridged with vlan_filtering=1: 'rx-vlan-filter' is on. An 8021q upper on top of a bridged hellcreek port will call dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid, and can again be vetoed through .port_prechangeupper. *It is not actually completely fine, because if I follow through correctly, we can have the following situation: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 ip link set lan0 master br0 # lan0 now becomes VLAN-unaware ip link set lan0 nomaster # lan0 fails to become VLAN-aware again, therefore breaking isolation This patch fixes that corner case by extending the DSA core logic, based on this requested attribute, to change the VLAN awareness state of the switch (port) when it leaves the bridge. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-24net: dsa: properly fall back to software bridgingVladimir Oltean1-2/+4
If the driver does not implement .port_bridge_{join,leave}, then we must fall back to standalone operation on that port, and trigger the error path of dsa_port_bridge_join. This sets dp->bridge_dev = NULL. In turn, having a non-NULL dp->bridge_dev when there is no offloading support makes the following things go wrong: - dsa_default_offload_fwd_mark make the wrong decision in setting skb->offload_fwd_mark. It should set skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0 for ports that don't offload the bridge, which should instruct the bridge to forward in software. But this does not happen, dp->bridge_dev is incorrectly set to point to the bridge, so the bridge is told that packets have been forwarded in hardware, which they haven't. - switchdev objects (MDBs, VLANs) should not be offloaded by ports that don't offload the bridge. Standalone ports should behave as packet-in, packet-out and the bridge should not be able to manipulate the pvid of the port, or tag stripping on egress, or ingress filtering. This should already work fine because dsa_slave_port_obj_add has: case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN: if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_port(dp, obj->orig_dev)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; err = dsa_slave_vlan_add(dev, obj, extack); but since dsa_port_offloads_bridge_port works based on dp->bridge_dev, this is again sabotaging us. All the above work in case the port has an unoffloaded LAG interface, so this is well exercised code, we should apply it for plain unoffloaded bridge ports too. Reported-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier supportVladimir Oltean1-0/+6
The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave timeVladimir Oltean1-8/+16
There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-14net: dsa: properly check for the bridge_leave methods in ↵Vladimir Oltean1-2/+2
dsa_switch_bridge_leave() This was not caught because there is no switch driver which implements the .port_bridge_join but not .port_bridge_leave method, but it should nonetheless be fixed, as in certain conditions (driver development) it might lead to NULL pointer dereference. Fixes: f66a6a69f97a ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-01net: dsa: return -EOPNOTSUPP when driver does not implement .port_lag_joinVladimir Oltean1-2/+2
The DSA core has a layered structure, and even though we end up returning 0 (success) to user space when setting a bonding/team upper that can't be offloaded, some parts of the framework actually need to know that we couldn't offload that. For example, if dsa_switch_lag_join returns 0 as it currently does, dsa_port_lag_join has no way to tell a successful offload from a software fallback, and it will call dsa_port_bridge_join afterwards. Then we'll think we're offloading the bridge master of the LAG, when in fact we're not even offloading the LAG. In turn, this will make us set skb->offload_fwd_mark = true, which is incorrect and the bridge doesn't like it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29net: dsa: reference count the FDB addresses at the cross-chip notifier levelVladimir Oltean1-7/+81
The same concerns expressed for host MDB entries are valid for host FDBs just as well: - in the case of multiple bridges spanning the same switch chip, deleting a host FDB entry that belongs to one bridge will result in breakage to the other bridge - not deleting FDB entries across DSA links means that the switch's hardware tables will eventually run out, given enough wear&tear So do the same thing and introduce reference counting for CPU ports and DSA links using the same data structures as we have for MDB entries. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29net: dsa: introduce a separate cross-chip notifier type for host FDBsVladimir Oltean1-0/+41
DSA treats some bridge FDB entries by trapping them to the CPU port. Currently, the only class of such entries are FDB addresses learnt by the software bridge on a foreign interface. However there are many more to be added: - FDB entries with the is_local flag (for termination) added by the bridge on the user ports (typically containing the MAC address of the bridge port) - FDB entries pointing towards the bridge net device (for termination). Typically these contain the MAC address of the bridge net device. - Static FDB entries installed on a foreign interface that is in the same bridge with a DSA user port. The reason why a separate cross-chip notifier for host FDBs is justified compared to normal FDBs is the same as in the case of host MDBs: the cross-chip notifier matching function in switch.c should avoid installing these entries on routing ports that route towards the targeted switch, but not towards the CPU. This is required in order to have proper support for H-like multi-chip topologies. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier levelVladimir Oltean1-9/+95
Ever since the cross-chip notifiers were introduced, the design was meant to be simplistic and just get the job done without worrying too much about dangling resources left behind. For example, somebody installs an MDB entry on sw0p0 in this daisy chain topology. It gets installed using ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on sw0p0, sw1p4 and sw2p4. | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Then the same person deletes that MDB entry. The cross-chip notifier for deletion only matches sw0p0: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Why? Because the DSA links are 'trunk' ports, if we just go ahead and delete the MDB from sw1p4 and sw2p4 directly, we might delete those multicast entries when they are still needed. Just consider the fact that somebody does: - add a multicast MAC address towards sw0p0 [ via the cross-chip notifiers it gets installed on the DSA links too ] - add the same multicast MAC address towards sw0p1 (another port of that same switch) - delete the same multicast MAC address from sw0p0. At this point, if we deleted the MAC address from the DSA links, it would be flooded, even though there is still an entry on switch 0 which needs it not to. So that is why deletions only match the targeted source port and nothing on DSA links. Of course, dangling resources means that the hardware tables will eventually run out given enough additions/removals, but hey, at least it's simple. But there is a bigger concern which needs to be addressed, and that is our support for SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB. DSA simply translates such an object into a dsa_port_host_mdb_add() which ends up as ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on the upstream port, and a similar thing happens on deletion: dsa_port_host_mdb_del() will trigger ds->ops->port_mdb_del() on the upstream port. When there are 2 VLAN-unaware bridges spanning the same switch (which is a use case DSA proudly supports), each bridge will install its own SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB entries. But upon deletion, DSA goes ahead and emits a DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL for dp->cpu_dp, which is shared between the user ports enslaved to br0 and the user ports enslaved to br1. Not good. The host-trapped multicast addresses installed by br1 will be deleted when any state changes in br0 (IGMP timers expire, or ports leave, etc). To avoid this, we could of course go the route of the zero-sum game and delete the DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL call for dp->cpu_dp. But the better design is to just admit that on shared ports like DSA links and CPU ports, we should be reference counting calls, even if this consumes some dynamic memory which DSA has traditionally avoided. On the flip side, the hardware tables of switches are limited in size, so it would be good if the OS managed them properly instead of having them eventually overflow. To address the memory usage concern, we only apply the refcounting of MDB entries on ports that are really shared (CPU ports and DSA links) and not on user ports. In a typical single-switch setup, this means only the CPU port (and the host MDB entries are not that many, really). The name of the newly introduced data structures (dsa_mac_addr) is chosen in such a way that will be reusable for host FDB entries (next patch). With this change, we can finally have the same matching logic for the MDB additions and deletions, as well as for their host-trapped variants. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29net: dsa: introduce a separate cross-chip notifier type for host MDBsVladimir Oltean1-0/+60
Commit abd49535c380 ("net: dsa: execute dsa_switch_mdb_add only for routing port in cross-chip topologies") does a surprisingly good job even for the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB use case, where DSA simply translates a switchdev object received on dp into a cross-chip notifier for dp->cpu_dp. To visualize how that works, imagine the daisy chain topology below and consider a SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB object emitted on sw2p0. How does the cross-chip notifier know to match on all the right ports (sw0p4, the dedicated CPU port, sw1p4, an upstream DSA link, and sw2p4, another upstream DSA link)? | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] The answer is simple: the dedicated CPU port of sw2p0 is sw0p4, and dsa_routing_port returns the upstream port for all switches. That is fine, but there are other topologies where this does not work as well. There are trees with "H" topologies in the wild, where there are 2 or more switches with DSA links between them, but every switch has its dedicated CPU port. For these topologies, it seems stupid for the neighbor switches to install an MDB entry on the routing port, since these multicast addresses are fundamentally different than the usual ones we support (and that is the justification for this patch, to introduce the concept of a termination plane multicast MAC address, as opposed to a forwarding plane multicast MAC address). For example, when a SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB would get added to sw0p0, without this patch, it would get treated as a regular port MDB on sw0p2 and it would match on the ports below (including the sw1p3 routing port). | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] ---- [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] With the patch, the host MDB notifier on sw0p0 matches only on the local switch, which is what we want for a termination plane address. | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] ---- [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Name this new matching function "dsa_switch_host_address_match" since we will be reusing it soon for host FDB entries as well. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-21net: dsa: remove cross-chip support from the MRP notifiersVladimir Oltean1-48/+7
With MRP hardware assist being supported only by the ocelot switch family, which by design does not support cross-chip bridging, the current match functions are at best a guess and have not been confirmed in any way to do anything relevant in a multi-switch topology. Drop the code and make the notifiers match only on the targeted switch port. Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-21net: dsa: targeted MTU notifiers should only match on one portVladimir Oltean1-3/+6
dsa_slave_change_mtu() calls dsa_port_mtu_change() twice: - it sends a cross-chip notifier with the MTU of the CPU port which is used to update the DSA links. - it sends one targeted MTU notifier which is supposed to only match the user port on which we are changing the MTU. The "propagate_upstream" variable is used here to bypass the cross-chip notifier system from switch.c But due to a mistake, the second, targeted notifier matches not only on the user port, but also on the DSA link which is a member of the same switch, if that exists. And because the DSA links of the entire dst were programmed in a previous round to the largest_mtu via a "propagate_upstream == true" notification, then the dsa_port_mtu_change(propagate_upstream == false) call that is immediately upcoming will break the MTU on the one DSA link which is chip-wise local to the dp whose MTU is changing right now. Example given this daisy chain topology: sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ user ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] ip link set sw0p1 mtu 9000 ip link set sw1p1 mtu 9000 # at this stage, sw0p1 and sw1p1 can talk # to one another using jumbo frames ip link set sw0p2 mtu 1500 # this programs the sw0p3 DSA link first to # the largest_mtu of 9000, then reprograms it to # 1500 with the "propagate_upstream == false" # notifier, breaking communication between # sw0p1 and sw1p1 To escape from this situation, make the targeted match really match on a single port - the user port, and rename the "propagate_upstream" variable to "targeted_match" to clarify the intention and avoid future issues. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-21net: dsa: execute dsa_switch_mdb_add only for routing port in cross-chip ↵Vladimir Oltean1-23/+2
topologies Currently, the notifier for adding a multicast MAC address matches on the targeted port and on all DSA links in the system, be they upstream or downstream links. This leads to a considerable amount of useless traffic. Consider this daisy chain topology, and a MDB add notifier emitted on sw0p0. It matches on sw0p0, sw0p3, sw1p3 and sw2p4. sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] But switch 0 has no reason to send the multicast traffic for that MAC address on sw0p3, which is how it reaches switches 1 and 2. Those switches don't expect, according to the user configuration, to receive this multicast address from switch 1, and they will drop it anyway, because the only valid destination is the port they received it on. They only need to configure themselves to deliver that multicast address _towards_ switch 1, where the MDB entry is installed. Similarly, switch 1 should not send this multicast traffic towards sw1p3, because that is how it reaches switch 2. With this change, the heat map for this MDB notifier changes as follows: sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Now the mdb notifier behaves the same as the fdb notifier. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-04-21net: dsa: Only notify CPU ports of changes to the tag protocolTobias Waldekranz1-18/+7
Previously DSA ports were also included, on the assumption that the protocol used by the CPU port had to the matched throughout the entire tree. As there is not yet any consumer in need of this, drop the call. Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-03-26net: dsa: only unset VLAN filtering when last port leaves last VLAN-aware bridgeVladimir Oltean1-6/+9
DSA is aware of switches with global VLAN filtering since the blamed commit, but it makes a bad decision when multiple bridges are spanning the same switch: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link add br1 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp3 master br0 ip link set swp4 master br1 ip link set swp5 master br1 ip link set swp5 nomaster ip link set swp4 nomaster [138665.939930] sja1105 spi0.1: port 3: dsa_core: VLAN filtering is a global setting [138665.947514] DSA: failed to notify DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_LEAVE When all ports leave br1, DSA blindly attempts to disable VLAN filtering on the switch, ignoring the fact that br0 still exists and is VLAN-aware too. It fails while doing that. This patch checks whether any port exists at all and is under a VLAN-aware bridge. Fixes: d371b7c92d19 ("net: dsa: Unset vlan_filtering when ports leave the bridge") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-17net: dsa: add MRP supportHoratiu Vultur1-0/+105
Add support for offloading MRP in HW. Currently implement the switchdev calls 'SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP', 'SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP', to allow to create MRP instances and to set the role of these instances. Add DSA_NOTIFIER_MRP_ADD/DEL and DSA_NOTIFIER_MRP_ADD/DEL_RING_ROLE which calls to .port_mrp_add/del and .port_mrp_add/del_ring_role in the DSA driver for the switch. Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-15net: dsa: propagate extack to .port_vlan_filteringVladimir Oltean1-1/+5
Some drivers can't dynamically change the VLAN filtering option, or impose some restrictions, it would be nice to propagate this info through netlink instead of printing it to a kernel log that might never be read. Also netlink extack includes the module that emitted the message, which means that it's easier to figure out which ones are driver-generated errors as opposed to command misuse. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-15net: dsa: propagate extack to .port_vlan_addVladimir Oltean1-1/+2
Allow drivers to communicate their restrictions to user space directly, instead of printing to the kernel log. Where the conversion would have been lossy and things like VLAN ID could no longer be conveyed (due to the lack of support for printf format specifier in netlink extack), I chose to keep the messages in full form to the kernel log only, and leave it up to individual driver maintainers to move more messages to extack. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12net: dsa: add support for offloading HSRGeorge McCollister1-0/+24
Add support for offloading of HSR/PRP (IEC 62439-3) tag insertion tag removal, duplicate generation and forwarding on DSA switches. Add DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_JOIN and DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE which trigger calls to .port_hsr_join and .port_hsr_leave in the DSA driver for the switch. The DSA switch driver should then set netdev feature flags for the HSR/PRP operation that it offloads. NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>