From 42da2c00b91486980a724c05c29818a7e60a067e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xujun Leng Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 15:14:23 +0800 Subject: docs: process: typo fix In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against". Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230312071423.3042-1-lengxujun2007@126.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation/process') diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see +explaining difference against previous submission (see :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`). See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email -- cgit v1.2.3