From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c index 0ba0a913b41d..99b77aff0839 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void timrot_irq_acknowledge(void) HW_TIMROT_TIMCTRLn(0) + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR); } -static cycle_t timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) { return ~((__raw_readl(mxs_timrot_base + HW_TIMROT_TIMCOUNTn(1)) & 0xffff0000) >> 16); -- cgit v1.2.3