From 601d6c4e701133ae23dd1b9507bf9d3a4172e586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eliad Peller Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 03:01:28 +0300 Subject: wl18xx: fix last tx rate calculation The last tx rate calculation didn't take into account the different indices of 11a and 11g rates tables. Add the required alignment (count only from the first 11a rate in case of 11a) Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c index be1ebd55ac88..3406ffb53325 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/tx.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void wl18xx_get_last_tx_rate(struct wl1271 *wl, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, - struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rate) + u8 band, struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rate) { u8 fw_rate = wl->fw_status->counters.tx_last_rate; @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ void wl18xx_get_last_tx_rate(struct wl1271 *wl, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, if (fw_rate <= CONF_HW_RATE_INDEX_54MBPS) { rate->idx = fw_rate; + if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ) + rate->idx -= CONF_HW_RATE_INDEX_6MBPS; rate->flags = 0; } else { rate->flags = IEEE80211_TX_RC_MCS; @@ -102,7 +104,8 @@ static void wl18xx_tx_complete_packet(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 tx_stat_byte) * first pass info->control.vif while it's valid, and then fill out * the info->status structures */ - wl18xx_get_last_tx_rate(wl, info->control.vif, &info->status.rates[0]); + wl18xx_get_last_tx_rate(wl, info->control.vif, + info->band, &info->status.rates[0]); info->status.rates[0].count = 1; /* no data about retries */ info->status.ack_signal = -1; -- cgit v1.2.3