From f981fec12cc5d2c07942301744b9ea61228bf246 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:04:19 -0500 Subject: btrfs: fail if fstrim_range->start == U64_MAX We've always been failing generic/260 because it's testing things we actually don't care about and thus won't fail for. However we probably should fail for fstrim_range->start == U64_MAX since we clearly can't trim anything past that. This in combination with an update to generic/260 will allow us to pass this test properly. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 3fd736a02c1e..fc4895e6a62c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -6051,6 +6051,9 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct fstrim_range *range) int dev_ret = 0; int ret = 0; + if (range->start == U64_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + /* * Check range overflow if range->len is set. * The default range->len is U64_MAX. -- cgit v1.2.3