From e21294a7aaae32c5d7154b187113a04db5852e37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:50:57 -0500 Subject: signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133 Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/exec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index a098c133d8d7..ac7b51b51f38 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ out: * SIGSEGV. */ if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current)) - force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV); + force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV); out_unmark: current->fs->in_exec = 0; -- cgit v1.2.3