From 686fe1bf6bcce3ce9fc03c9d9035c643c320ca46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:51:10 +0100 Subject: rcuscale: Add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test The single-argument variant of kfree_rcu() is currently not tested by any member of the rcutoture test suite. This commit therefore adds rcuscale code to test it. This testing is controlled by two new boolean module parameters, kfree_rcu_test_single and kfree_rcu_test_double. If one is set and the other not, only the corresponding variant is tested, otherwise both are tested, with the variant to be tested determined randomly on each invocation. Both of these module parameters are initialized to false, so setting either to true will test only that variant. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c') diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c index 06491d5530db..dca51fe9c73f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c @@ -625,6 +625,8 @@ rcu_scale_shutdown(void *arg) torture_param(int, kfree_nthreads, -1, "Number of threads running loops of kfree_rcu()."); torture_param(int, kfree_alloc_num, 8000, "Number of allocations and frees done in an iteration."); torture_param(int, kfree_loops, 10, "Number of loops doing kfree_alloc_num allocations and frees."); +torture_param(bool, kfree_rcu_test_double, false, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() double-argument scale test?"); +torture_param(bool, kfree_rcu_test_single, false, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test?"); static struct task_struct **kfree_reader_tasks; static int kfree_nrealthreads; @@ -644,10 +646,13 @@ kfree_scale_thread(void *arg) struct kfree_obj *alloc_ptr; u64 start_time, end_time; long long mem_begin, mem_during = 0; + bool kfree_rcu_test_both; + DEFINE_TORTURE_RANDOM(tr); VERBOSE_SCALEOUT_STRING("kfree_scale_thread task started"); set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(me % nr_cpu_ids)); set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE); + kfree_rcu_test_both = (kfree_rcu_test_single == kfree_rcu_test_double); start_time = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); @@ -670,7 +675,15 @@ kfree_scale_thread(void *arg) if (!alloc_ptr) return -ENOMEM; - kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh); + // By default kfree_rcu_test_single and kfree_rcu_test_double are + // initialized to false. If both have the same value (false or true) + // both are randomly tested, otherwise only the one with value true + // is tested. + if ((kfree_rcu_test_single && !kfree_rcu_test_double) || + (kfree_rcu_test_both && torture_random(&tr) & 0x800)) + kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr); + else + kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh); } cond_resched(); -- cgit v1.2.3