From 6b9c2950c912780ce113079c9c52041b1e2a611a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:48 -0700 Subject: bpf: flatten bpf_probe_register call chain bpf_probe_register() and __bpf_probe_register() have identical signatures and bpf_probe_register() just redirect to __bpf_probe_register(). So get rid of this extra function call step to simplify following the source code. It has no difference at runtime due to inlining, of course. Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Message-ID: <20240319233852.1977493-2-andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 1b041911b1d8..30ecf62f8a17 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(10); BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(11); BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(12); -static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) +int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) { struct tracepoint *tp = btp->tp; @@ -2443,11 +2443,6 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog * prog); } -int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) -{ - return __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog); -} - int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog) { return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog); -- cgit v1.2.3