From fad646e16d3cafd67d3cfff8e66f77401190957e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Archie Pusaka Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:37:25 +0800 Subject: Bluetooth: use inclusive language in SMP This patch replaces some non-inclusive terms based on the appropriate language mapping table compiled by the Bluetooth SIG: https://specificationrefs.bluetooth.com/language-mapping/Appropriate_Language_Mapping_Table.pdf Specifically, these terms are replaced: master -> initiator slave -> responder Signed-off-by: Archie Pusaka Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann --- net/bluetooth/smp.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/bluetooth/smp.c') diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c index 4d93c6c32a71..6197f8ae53ab 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c @@ -111,9 +111,9 @@ struct smp_chan { u8 id_addr_type; u8 irk[16]; struct smp_csrk *csrk; - struct smp_csrk *slave_csrk; + struct smp_csrk *responder_csrk; struct smp_ltk *ltk; - struct smp_ltk *slave_ltk; + struct smp_ltk *responder_ltk; struct smp_irk *remote_irk; u8 *link_key; unsigned long flags; @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn) mgmt_smp_complete(hcon, complete); kfree_sensitive(smp->csrk); - kfree_sensitive(smp->slave_csrk); + kfree_sensitive(smp->responder_csrk); kfree_sensitive(smp->link_key); crypto_free_shash(smp->tfm_cmac); @@ -776,9 +776,9 @@ static void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn) kfree_rcu(smp->ltk, rcu); } - if (smp->slave_ltk) { - list_del_rcu(&smp->slave_ltk->list); - kfree_rcu(smp->slave_ltk, rcu); + if (smp->responder_ltk) { + list_del_rcu(&smp->responder_ltk->list); + kfree_rcu(smp->responder_ltk, rcu); } if (smp->remote_irk) { @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp) int ret; bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p %s", conn, - conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave"); + conn->hcon->out ? "initiator" : "responder"); ret = smp_c1(smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp, hcon->init_addr_type, &hcon->init_addr, @@ -1021,8 +1021,8 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp) else auth = 0; - /* Even though there's no _SLAVE suffix this is the - * slave STK we're adding for later lookup (the master + /* Even though there's no _RESPONDER suffix this is the + * responder STK we're adding for later lookup (the initiator * STK never needs to be stored). */ hci_add_ltk(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type, @@ -1077,10 +1077,10 @@ static void smp_notify_keys(struct l2cap_conn *conn) mgmt_new_csrk(hdev, smp->csrk, persistent); } - if (smp->slave_csrk) { - smp->slave_csrk->bdaddr_type = hcon->dst_type; - bacpy(&smp->slave_csrk->bdaddr, &hcon->dst); - mgmt_new_csrk(hdev, smp->slave_csrk, persistent); + if (smp->responder_csrk) { + smp->responder_csrk->bdaddr_type = hcon->dst_type; + bacpy(&smp->responder_csrk->bdaddr, &hcon->dst); + mgmt_new_csrk(hdev, smp->responder_csrk, persistent); } if (smp->ltk) { @@ -1089,10 +1089,10 @@ static void smp_notify_keys(struct l2cap_conn *conn) mgmt_new_ltk(hdev, smp->ltk, persistent); } - if (smp->slave_ltk) { - smp->slave_ltk->bdaddr_type = hcon->dst_type; - bacpy(&smp->slave_ltk->bdaddr, &hcon->dst); - mgmt_new_ltk(hdev, smp->slave_ltk, persistent); + if (smp->responder_ltk) { + smp->responder_ltk->bdaddr_type = hcon->dst_type; + bacpy(&smp->responder_ltk->bdaddr, &hcon->dst); + mgmt_new_ltk(hdev, smp->responder_ltk, persistent); } if (smp->link_key) { @@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp) if (*keydist & SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY) { struct smp_cmd_encrypt_info enc; - struct smp_cmd_master_ident ident; + struct smp_cmd_initiator_ident ident; struct smp_ltk *ltk; u8 authenticated; __le16 ediv; @@ -1293,14 +1293,15 @@ static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp) authenticated = hcon->sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH; ltk = hci_add_ltk(hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type, - SMP_LTK_SLAVE, authenticated, enc.ltk, + SMP_LTK_RESPONDER, authenticated, enc.ltk, smp->enc_key_size, ediv, rand); - smp->slave_ltk = ltk; + smp->responder_ltk = ltk; ident.ediv = ediv; ident.rand = rand; - smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_MASTER_IDENT, sizeof(ident), &ident); + smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_INITIATOR_IDENT, sizeof(ident), + &ident); *keydist &= ~SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY; } @@ -1343,7 +1344,7 @@ static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp) csrk->type = MGMT_CSRK_LOCAL_UNAUTHENTICATED; memcpy(csrk->val, sign.csrk, sizeof(csrk->val)); } - smp->slave_csrk = csrk; + smp->responder_csrk = csrk; smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SIGN_INFO, sizeof(sign), &sign); @@ -2048,7 +2049,7 @@ static int fixup_sc_false_positive(struct smp_chan *smp) struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, *rsp; u8 auth; - /* The issue is only observed when we're in slave role */ + /* The issue is only observed when we're in responder role */ if (hcon->out) return SMP_UNSPECIFIED; @@ -2084,7 +2085,8 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon; struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev; - bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p %s", conn, hcon->out ? "master" : "slave"); + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p %s", conn, + hcon->out ? "initiator" : "responder"); if (skb->len < sizeof(smp->pcnf)) return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS; @@ -2251,7 +2253,7 @@ static bool smp_ltk_encrypt(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 sec_level) hci_le_start_enc(hcon, key->ediv, key->rand, key->val, key->enc_size); hcon->enc_key_size = key->enc_size; - /* We never store STKs for master role, so clear this flag */ + /* We never store STKs for initiator role, so clear this flag */ clear_bit(HCI_CONN_STK_ENCRYPT, &hcon->flags); return true; @@ -2467,7 +2469,7 @@ int smp_cancel_and_remove_pairing(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr, /* Set keys to NULL to make sure smp_failure() does not try to * remove and free already invalidated rcu list entries. */ smp->ltk = NULL; - smp->slave_ltk = NULL; + smp->responder_ltk = NULL; smp->remote_irk = NULL; if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_COMPLETE, &smp->flags)) @@ -2503,7 +2505,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_encrypt_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS; } - SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_MASTER_IDENT); + SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_INITIATOR_IDENT); skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp)); @@ -2512,9 +2514,9 @@ static int smp_cmd_encrypt_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -static int smp_cmd_master_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) +static int smp_cmd_initiator_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) { - struct smp_cmd_master_ident *rp = (void *) skb->data; + struct smp_cmd_initiator_ident *rp = (void *)skb->data; struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp; struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data; struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev; @@ -2913,7 +2915,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_dhkey_check(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) return 0; } - /* Slave sends DHKey check as response to master */ + /* Responder sends DHKey check as response to initiator */ sc_dhkey_check(smp); } @@ -3000,8 +3002,8 @@ static int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb) reason = smp_cmd_encrypt_info(conn, skb); break; - case SMP_CMD_MASTER_IDENT: - reason = smp_cmd_master_ident(conn, skb); + case SMP_CMD_INITIATOR_IDENT: + reason = smp_cmd_initiator_ident(conn, skb); break; case SMP_CMD_IDENT_INFO: -- cgit v1.2.3