Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move this uncommon header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Move this uncommon header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
These functions belong in time.h so move them over and add comments.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The interruption support had be removed for ARM architecture and
the function get_timer_masked() is no more used except in some
the timer.c files.
This patch clean each timer.c which implement this function and
remove the associated prototype in u-boot-arm.h
For timer.c, I don't verify if the weak version of get_timer
(in lib/time.c) can be used
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Some Freescale boards used an extra version of the constant to hold the
Generic Timer frequency. This can easily be covered by the now unified
COUNTER_FREQUENCY constant, so remove this extra variable from those
boards.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
|
|
This patch addresses a problem mentioned recently on this mailing list:
[1].
In that posting a LS1021 based system was locking up at about 5 minutes
after boot, but the problem was mysteriously related to the toolchain
used for building u-boot. Debugging the problem reveals a stuck
interrupt 29 on the GIC.
It appears Freescale's LS1021 support in u-boot erroneously sets the
64-bit ARM generic PL1 physical time CompareValue register to all-ones
with a 32-bit value. This causes the timer compare to fire 344 seconds
after u-boot configures it. Depending on how fast u-boot gets the
kernel booted, this amounts to about 5-minutes of Linux uptime before
locking up.
Apparently the bug is masked by some toolchains. Perhaps this is
explained by default compiler options, word sizes, or binutils versions.
At any rate this patch makes the manipulation explicitly 64-bit which
alleviates the issue.
[1]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-June/014400.html
Signed-off-by: Chris Kilgour <techie@whiterocker.com>
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
The QorIQ LS1 family is built on Layerscape architecture,
the industry's first software-aware, core-agnostic networking
architecture to offer unprecedented efficiency and scale.
Freescale LS102xA is a set of SoCs combines two ARM
Cortex-A7 cores that have been optimized for high
reliability and pack the highest level of integration
available for sub-3 W embedded communications processors
with Layerscape architecture and with a comprehensive
enablement model focused on ease of programmability.
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Jin <jason.jin@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu <jingchang.lu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
|