summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/run-ci
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEd Tanous <edtanous@google.com>2022-02-08 00:30:00 +0300
committerEd Tanous <ed@tanous.net>2022-02-14 23:25:49 +0300
commit0a4304cf40247771c63dc6be9b36d120a29fcb6d (patch)
tree7474ea9288160caa199441addfff7f50a72c7a3e /run-ci
parent0e46c8a472165ac46dc03de5e581c780c43602b7 (diff)
downloadbmcweb-0a4304cf40247771c63dc6be9b36d120a29fcb6d.tar.xz
Remove invalid base log message
The redfish base registry does not include a definition of this message, which generating type-safe models has teased out. Replace the MutuallyExclusiveProperties message with two "PropertyValueConflict" messages. This seems like the closest thing, but in lieu of the things not being in the standard, this seems like the best compromise. Tested: curl --insecure -X POST --user root:0penBmc https://192.168.7.2/redfish/v1/EventService/Subscriptions -d '{"MessageIds":[""],"RegistryPrefixes":[""],"Destination":"","Protocol":""}' Returns: { "error": { "@Message.ExtendedInfo": [ { "@odata.type": "#Message.v1_1_1.Message", "Message": "The property 'MessageIds' could not be written because its value would conflict with the value of the 'RegistryPrefixes' property.", "MessageArgs": [ "MessageIds", "RegistryPrefixes" ], "MessageId": "Base.1.8.1.PropertyValueConflict", "MessageSeverity": "Warning", "Resolution": "No resolution is required." } ], "code": "Base.1.8.1.PropertyValueConflict", "message": "The property 'MessageIds' could not be written because its value would conflict with the value of the 'RegistryPrefixes' property." } } Signed-off-by: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com> Change-Id: I1eaf4d06b6f5b85909392c48970e3f353af3a41e
Diffstat (limited to 'run-ci')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions