summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>2023-01-11 02:14:43 +0300
committerRob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>2023-01-16 21:40:24 +0300
commitfadcc3ab1302d4e5baa32c272b658221f0066696 (patch)
treeebf4601780315361f34dca1d75c0385176fdadf9 /drivers/gpu/drm
parent6563f60f14cbb3dcbdc4e1d8469fc0fbaaa80544 (diff)
downloadlinux-fadcc3ab1302d4e5baa32c272b658221f0066696.tar.xz
drm/msm/gpu: Bypass PM QoS constraint for idle clamp
Change idle freq clamping back to the direct method, bypassing PM QoS requests. The problem with using PM QoS requests is they call (indirectly) the governors ->get_target_freq() which goes thru a get_dev_status() cycle. The problem comes when the GPU becomes active again and we remove the idle-clamp request, we go through another get_dev_status() cycle for the period that the GPU has been idle, which triggers the governor to lower the target freq excessively. This partially reverts commit 7c0ffcd40b16 ("drm/msm/gpu: Respect PM QoS constraints"), but preserves the use of boost QoS request, so that it will continue to play nicely with other QoS requests such as a cooling device. This also mostly undoes commit 78f815c1cf8f ("drm/msm: return the average load over the polling period") Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/517785/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110231447.1939101-3-robdclark@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h12
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c135
2 files changed, 65 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
index 9e36f6c9bc29..a771f56ed70f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
@@ -109,11 +109,15 @@ struct msm_gpu_devfreq {
struct mutex lock;
/**
- * idle_constraint:
+ * idle_freq:
*
- * A PM QoS constraint to limit max freq while the GPU is idle.
+ * Shadow frequency used while the GPU is idle. From the PoV of
+ * the devfreq governor, we are continuing to sample busyness and
+ * adjust frequency while the GPU is idle, but we use this shadow
+ * value as the GPU is actually clamped to minimum frequency while
+ * it is inactive.
*/
- struct dev_pm_qos_request idle_freq;
+ unsigned long idle_freq;
/**
* boost_constraint:
@@ -135,8 +139,6 @@ struct msm_gpu_devfreq {
/** idle_time: Time of last transition to idle: */
ktime_t idle_time;
- struct devfreq_dev_status average_status;
-
/**
* idle_work:
*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
index 1f4e2dd8e76d..ae5380e2abf7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
@@ -33,6 +33,16 @@ static int msm_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
trace_msm_gpu_freq_change(dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp));
+ /*
+ * If the GPU is idle, devfreq is not aware, so just stash
+ * the new target freq (to use when we return to active)
+ */
+ if (df->idle_freq) {
+ df->idle_freq = *freq;
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (gpu->funcs->gpu_set_freq) {
mutex_lock(&df->lock);
gpu->funcs->gpu_set_freq(gpu, opp, df->suspended);
@@ -48,15 +58,26 @@ static int msm_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
static unsigned long get_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
+ struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
+
+ /*
+ * If the GPU is idle, use the shadow/saved freq to avoid
+ * confusing devfreq (which is unaware that we are switching
+ * to lowest freq until the device is active again)
+ */
+ if (df->idle_freq)
+ return df->idle_freq;
+
if (gpu->funcs->gpu_get_freq)
return gpu->funcs->gpu_get_freq(gpu);
return clk_get_rate(gpu->core_clk);
}
-static void get_raw_dev_status(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
+static int msm_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
struct devfreq_dev_status *status)
{
+ struct msm_gpu *gpu = dev_to_gpu(dev);
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
u64 busy_cycles, busy_time;
unsigned long sample_rate;
@@ -72,7 +93,7 @@ static void get_raw_dev_status(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
if (df->suspended) {
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
status->busy_time = 0;
- return;
+ return 0;
}
busy_cycles = gpu->funcs->gpu_busy(gpu, &sample_rate);
@@ -87,71 +108,6 @@ static void get_raw_dev_status(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
busy_time = ~0LU;
status->busy_time = busy_time;
-}
-
-static void update_average_dev_status(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
- const struct devfreq_dev_status *raw)
-{
- struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
- const u32 polling_ms = df->devfreq->profile->polling_ms;
- const u32 max_history_ms = polling_ms * 11 / 10;
- struct devfreq_dev_status *avg = &df->average_status;
- u64 avg_freq;
-
- /* simple_ondemand governor interacts poorly with gpu->clamp_to_idle.
- * When we enforce the constraint on idle, it calls get_dev_status
- * which would normally reset the stats. When we remove the
- * constraint on active, it calls get_dev_status again where busy_time
- * would be 0.
- *
- * To remedy this, we always return the average load over the past
- * polling_ms.
- */
-
- /* raw is longer than polling_ms or avg has no history */
- if (div_u64(raw->total_time, USEC_PER_MSEC) >= polling_ms ||
- !avg->total_time) {
- *avg = *raw;
- return;
- }
-
- /* Truncate the oldest history first.
- *
- * Because we keep the history with a single devfreq_dev_status,
- * rather than a list of devfreq_dev_status, we have to assume freq
- * and load are the same over avg->total_time. We can scale down
- * avg->busy_time and avg->total_time by the same factor to drop
- * history.
- */
- if (div_u64(avg->total_time + raw->total_time, USEC_PER_MSEC) >=
- max_history_ms) {
- const u32 new_total_time = polling_ms * USEC_PER_MSEC -
- raw->total_time;
- avg->busy_time = div_u64(
- mul_u32_u32(avg->busy_time, new_total_time),
- avg->total_time);
- avg->total_time = new_total_time;
- }
-
- /* compute the average freq over avg->total_time + raw->total_time */
- avg_freq = mul_u32_u32(avg->current_frequency, avg->total_time);
- avg_freq += mul_u32_u32(raw->current_frequency, raw->total_time);
- do_div(avg_freq, avg->total_time + raw->total_time);
-
- avg->current_frequency = avg_freq;
- avg->busy_time += raw->busy_time;
- avg->total_time += raw->total_time;
-}
-
-static int msm_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
- struct devfreq_dev_status *status)
-{
- struct msm_gpu *gpu = dev_to_gpu(dev);
- struct devfreq_dev_status raw;
-
- get_raw_dev_status(gpu, &raw);
- update_average_dev_status(gpu, &raw);
- *status = gpu->devfreq.average_status;
return 0;
}
@@ -191,9 +147,6 @@ void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
mutex_init(&df->lock);
- dev_pm_qos_add_request(&gpu->pdev->dev, &df->idle_freq,
- DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY,
- PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE);
dev_pm_qos_add_request(&gpu->pdev->dev, &df->boost_freq,
DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
@@ -214,7 +167,6 @@ void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
if (IS_ERR(df->devfreq)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev, "Couldn't initialize GPU devfreq\n");
- dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->idle_freq);
dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
df->devfreq = NULL;
return;
@@ -256,7 +208,6 @@ void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
devfreq_cooling_unregister(gpu->cooling);
dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
- dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->idle_freq);
}
void msm_devfreq_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
@@ -329,6 +280,7 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
unsigned int idle_time;
+ unsigned long target_freq;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
@@ -338,8 +290,28 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
*/
cancel_idle_work(df);
+ /*
+ * Hold devfreq lock to synchronize with get_dev_status()/
+ * target() callbacks
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&df->devfreq->lock);
+
+ target_freq = df->idle_freq;
+
idle_time = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), df->idle_time));
+ df->idle_freq = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * We could have become active again before the idle work had a
+ * chance to run, in which case the df->idle_freq would have
+ * still been zero. In this case, no need to change freq.
+ */
+ if (target_freq)
+ msm_devfreq_target(&gpu->pdev->dev, &target_freq, 0);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&df->devfreq->lock);
+
/*
* If we've been idle for a significant fraction of a polling
* interval, then we won't meet the threshold of busyness for
@@ -348,9 +320,6 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
if (idle_time > msm_devfreq_profile.polling_ms) {
msm_devfreq_boost(gpu, 2);
}
-
- dev_pm_qos_update_request(&df->idle_freq,
- PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE);
}
@@ -360,11 +329,23 @@ static void msm_devfreq_idle_work(struct kthread_work *work)
struct msm_gpu_devfreq, idle_work.work);
struct msm_gpu *gpu = container_of(df, struct msm_gpu, devfreq);
struct msm_drm_private *priv = gpu->dev->dev_private;
+ unsigned long idle_freq, target_freq = 0;
- df->idle_time = ktime_get();
+ /*
+ * Hold devfreq lock to synchronize with get_dev_status()/
+ * target() callbacks
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&df->devfreq->lock);
+
+ idle_freq = get_freq(gpu);
if (priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle)
- dev_pm_qos_update_request(&df->idle_freq, 0);
+ msm_devfreq_target(&gpu->pdev->dev, &target_freq, 0);
+
+ df->idle_time = ktime_get();
+ df->idle_freq = idle_freq;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&df->devfreq->lock);
}
void msm_devfreq_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)