watchdog/softlockup: Report the most frequent interrupts

When the watchdog determines that the current soft lockup is due to an
interrupt storm based on CPU utilization, reporting the most frequent
interrupts could be good enough for further troubleshooting.

Below is an example of interrupt storm. The call tree does not provide
useful information, but analyzing which interrupt caused the soft lockup by
comparing the counts of interrupts during the lockup period allows to
identify the culprit.

[  638.870231] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 26s! [swapper/9:0]
[  638.870825] CPU#9 Utilization every 4s during lockup:
[  638.871194]  #1:   0% system,          0% softirq,   100% hardirq,     0% idle
[  638.871652]  #2:   0% system,          0% softirq,   100% hardirq,     0% idle
[  638.872107]  #3:   0% system,          0% softirq,   100% hardirq,     0% idle
[  638.872563]  #4:   0% system,          0% softirq,   100% hardirq,     0% idle
[  638.873018]  #5:   0% system,          0% softirq,   100% hardirq,     0% idle
[  638.873494] CPU#9 Detect HardIRQ Time exceeds 50%. Most frequent HardIRQs:
[  638.873994]  #1: 330945      irq#7
[  638.874236]  #2: 31          irq#82
[  638.874493]  #3: 10          irq#10
[  638.874744]  #4: 2           irq#89
[  638.874992]  #5: 1           irq#102
...
[  638.875313] Call trace:
[  638.875315]  __do_softirq+0xa8/0x364

Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411074134.30922-6-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions