diff options
| author | Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> | 2024-04-25 23:24:29 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> | 2024-05-20 18:37:15 +0300 |
| commit | f06d1b10cb016d5aaecdb1804fefca025387bd10 (patch) | |
| tree | c419fa88261324df9acd7b7ceccbdbc2371912b2 /fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | |
| parent | 0dc9f430027b8bd9073fdafdfcdeb1a073ab5594 (diff) | |
| download | linux-f06d1b10cb016d5aaecdb1804fefca025387bd10.tar.xz | |
NFS: Fix READ_PLUS when server doesn't support OP_READ_PLUS
Olga showed me a case where the client was sending multiple READ_PLUS
calls to the server in parallel, and the server replied
NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP to each. The client would fall back to READ for the
first reply, but fail to retry the other calls.
I fix this by removing the test for NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS in
nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(). This allows us to reschedule any
READ_PLUS call that has a NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP return value, even after the
capability has been cleared.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Fixes: c567552612ec ("NFS: Add READ_PLUS data segment support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index ea390db94b62..c93c12063b3a 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5456,7 +5456,7 @@ static bool nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(struct rpc_task *task, struct rpc_message *msg = &task->tk_msg; if (msg->rpc_proc == &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ_PLUS] && - server->caps & NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS && task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) { + task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) { server->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS; msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ]; rpc_restart_call_prepare(task); |