firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type

The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the
mailbox transport layer.

This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
file: mailbox.c and all struct shared_mem related code to a new file:
shmem.c.

We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
messages.

The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8698a3cec199b8feab35c2339f02dc232bfd773b.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

1 files changed, 184 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..73077bbc4ad9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) Message Mailbox Transport
+ * driver.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "common.h"
+
+/**
+ * struct scmi_mailbox - Structure representing a SCMI mailbox transport
+ *
+ * @cl: Mailbox Client
+ * @chan: Transmit/Receive mailbox channel
+ * @cinfo: SCMI channel info
+ * @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area
+ */
+struct scmi_mailbox {
+	struct mbox_client cl;
+	struct mbox_chan *chan;
+	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
+	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem;
+};
+
+#define client_to_scmi_mailbox(c) container_of(c, struct scmi_mailbox, cl)
+
+static void tx_prepare(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = client_to_scmi_mailbox(cl);
+
+	shmem_tx_prepare(smbox->shmem, m);
+}
+
+static void rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = client_to_scmi_mailbox(cl);
+
+	scmi_rx_callback(smbox->cinfo, shmem_read_header(smbox->shmem));
+}
+
+static bool mailbox_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx)
+{
+	return !of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "mboxes",
+					   "#mbox-cells", idx, NULL);
+}
+
+static int mailbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
+			      bool tx)
+{
+	const char *desc = tx ? "Tx" : "Rx";
+	struct device *cdev = cinfo->dev;
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox;
+	struct device_node *shmem;
+	int ret, idx = tx ? 0 : 1;
+	struct mbox_client *cl;
+	resource_size_t size;
+	struct resource res;
+
+	smbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*smbox), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!smbox)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	shmem = of_parse_phandle(cdev->of_node, "shmem", idx);
+	ret = of_address_to_resource(shmem, 0, &res);
+	of_node_put(shmem);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(cdev, "failed to get SCMI %s shared memory\n", desc);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	size = resource_size(&res);
+	smbox->shmem = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, size);
+	if (!smbox->shmem) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to ioremap SCMI %s shared memory\n", desc);
+		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+	}
+
+	cl = &smbox->cl;
+	cl->dev = cdev;
+	cl->tx_prepare = tx ? tx_prepare : NULL;
+	cl->rx_callback = rx_callback;
+	cl->tx_block = false;
+	cl->knows_txdone = tx;
+
+	smbox->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, tx ? 0 : 1);
+	if (IS_ERR(smbox->chan)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(smbox->chan);
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(cdev, "failed to request SCMI %s mailbox\n",
+				tx ? "Tx" : "Rx");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	cinfo->transport_info = smbox;
+	smbox->cinfo = cinfo;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mailbox_chan_free(int id, void *p, void *data)
+{
+	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = p;
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(smbox->chan)) {
+		mbox_free_channel(smbox->chan);
+		cinfo->transport_info = NULL;
+		smbox->chan = NULL;
+		smbox->cinfo = NULL;
+	}
+
+	scmi_free_channel(cinfo, data, id);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mailbox_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
+				struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mbox_send_message(smbox->chan, xfer);
+
+	/* mbox_send_message returns non-negative value on success, so reset */
+	if (ret > 0)
+		ret = 0;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void mailbox_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: we might prefer not to need the mailbox ticker to manage the
+	 * transfer queueing since the protocol layer queues things by itself.
+	 * Unfortunately, we have to kick the mailbox framework after we have
+	 * received our message.
+	 */
+	mbox_client_txdone(smbox->chan, ret);
+}
+
+static void mailbox_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
+				   struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	shmem_fetch_response(smbox->shmem, xfer);
+}
+
+static bool
+mailbox_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+{
+	struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+	return shmem_poll_done(smbox->shmem, xfer);
+}
+
+static struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_mailbox_ops = {
+	.chan_available = mailbox_chan_available,
+	.chan_setup = mailbox_chan_setup,
+	.chan_free = mailbox_chan_free,
+	.send_message = mailbox_send_message,
+	.mark_txdone = mailbox_mark_txdone,
+	.fetch_response = mailbox_fetch_response,
+	.poll_done = mailbox_poll_done,
+};
+
+const struct scmi_desc scmi_mailbox_desc = {
+	.ops = &scmi_mailbox_ops,
+	.max_rx_timeout_ms = 30, /* We may increase this if required */
+	.max_msg = 20, /* Limited by MBOX_TX_QUEUE_LEN */
+	.max_msg_size = 128,
+};