summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/crypto
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-08-07mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()Waiman Long3-7/+8
As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-07-31fscrypt: don't load ->i_crypt_info before it's known to be validEric Biggers1-1/+2
In fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(), ->i_crypt_info isn't known to be non-NULL until we check fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(). So, load ->i_crypt_info after the check rather than before. This makes no difference currently, but it prevents people from introducing bugs where the pointer is dereferenced when it may be NULL. Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727174158.121456-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-22fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_infoEric Biggers2-3/+13
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also involves initializing a static or global variable, for example. fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto. So by using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal implementation details of these other kernel subsystems. Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead. (Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.) Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-22fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->s_master_keysEric Biggers1-3/+12
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also involves initializing a static or global variable, for example. super_block::s_master_keys is a keyring, which is internal to and is allocated by the keyrings subsystem. By using READ_ONCE() for it, we're relying on internal implementation details of the keyrings subsystem. Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead. (Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.) Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-22fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for fscrypt_prepared_keyEric Biggers3-10/+17
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also involves initializing a static or global variable, for example. fscrypt_prepared_key includes a pointer to a crypto_skcipher object, which is internal to and is allocated by the crypto subsystem. By using READ_ONCE() for it, we're relying on internal implementation details of the crypto subsystem. Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead. (Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.) Fixes: 5fee36095cda ("fscrypt: add inline encryption support") Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-22fscrypt: switch fscrypt_do_sha256() to use the SHA-256 libraryEric Biggers2-32/+11
fscrypt_do_sha256() is only used for hashing encrypted filenames to create no-key tokens, which isn't performance-critical. Therefore a C implementation of SHA-256 is sufficient. Also, the logic to create no-key tokens is always potentially needed. This differs from fscrypt's other dependencies on crypto API algorithms, which are conditionally needed depending on what encryption policies userspace is using. Therefore, for fscrypt there isn't much benefit to allowing SHA-256 to be a loadable module. So, make fscrypt_do_sha256() use the SHA-256 library instead of the crypto_shash API. This is much simpler, since it avoids having to implement one-time-init (which is hard to do correctly, and in fact was implemented incorrectly) and handle failures to allocate the crypto_shash object. Fixes: edc440e3d27f ("fscrypt: improve format of no-key names") Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-21fscrypt: restrict IV_INO_LBLK_* to AES-256-XTSEric Biggers1-0/+14
IV_INO_LBLK_* exist only because of hardware limitations, and currently the only known use case for them involves AES-256-XTS. Therefore, for now only allow them in combination with AES-256-XTS. This way we don't have to worry about them being combined with other encryption modes. (To be clear, combining IV_INO_LBLK_* with other encryption modes *should* work just fine. It's just not being tested, so we can't be 100% sure it works. So with no known use case, it's best to disallow it for now, just like we don't allow other weird combinations like AES-256-XTS contents encryption with Adiantum filenames encryption.) This can be relaxed later if a use case for other combinations arises. Fixes: b103fb7653ff ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies") Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721181012.39308-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-21fscrypt: rename FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZEEric Biggers5-14/+13
The name "FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE" is a bit outdated since due to the addition of FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY, the file nonce may now be used as a tweak instead of for key derivation. Also, we're now prefixing the fscrypt constants with "FSCRYPT_" instead of "FS_". Therefore, rename this constant to FSCRYPT_FILE_NONCE_SIZE. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215722.147154-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-21fscrypt: add comments that describe the HKDF info stringsEric Biggers1-7/+7
Each HKDF context byte is associated with a specific format of the remaining part of the application-specific info string. Add comments so that it's easier to keep track of what these all are. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215529.146890-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-08fscrypt: add inline encryption supportSatya Tangirala10-47/+588
Add support for inline encryption to fs/crypto/. With "inline encryption", the block layer handles the decryption/encryption as part of the bio, instead of the filesystem doing the crypto itself via Linux's crypto API. This model is needed in order to take advantage of the inline encryption hardware present on most modern mobile SoCs. To use inline encryption, the filesystem needs to be mounted with '-o inlinecrypt'. Blk-crypto will then be used instead of the traditional filesystem-layer crypto whenever possible to encrypt the contents of any encrypted files in that filesystem. Fscrypt still provides the key and IV to use, and the actual ciphertext on-disk is still the same; therefore it's testable using the existing fscrypt ciphertext verification tests. Note that since blk-crypto has a fallback to Linux's crypto API, and also supports all the encryption modes currently supported by fscrypt, this feature is usable and testable even without actual inline encryption hardware. Per-filesystem changes will be needed to set encryption contexts when submitting bios and to implement the 'inlinecrypt' mount option. This patch just adds the common code. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702015607.1215430-3-satyat@google.com Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-06-01Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscryptLinus Torvalds7-164/+444
Pull fscrypt updates from Eric Biggers: - Add the IV_INO_LBLK_32 encryption policy flag which modifies the encryption to be optimized for eMMC inline encryption hardware. - Make the test_dummy_encryption mount option for ext4 and f2fs support v2 encryption policies. - Fix kerneldoc warnings and some coding style inconsistencies. * tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt: fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2 fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() linux/parser.h: add include guards fscrypt: remove unnecessary extern keywords fscrypt: name all function parameters fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warnings
2020-05-19fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policiesEric Biggers5-41/+126
The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permits the moving of encrypted file contents (as f2fs's garbage collector requires) is still desirable. To support such hardware, add a new encryption format IV_INO_LBLK_32 that makes the best use of the 32 bits: the IV is set to 'SipHash-2-4(inode_number) + file_logical_block_number mod 2^32', where the SipHash key is derived from the fscrypt master key. We hash only the inode number and not also the block number, because we need to maintain contiguity of DUNs to merge bios. Unlike with IV_INO_LBLK_64, with this format IV reuse is possible; this is unavoidable given the size of the DUN. This means this format should only be used where the requirements of the first paragraph apply. However, the hash spreads out the IVs in the whole usable range, and the use of a keyed hash makes it difficult for an attacker to determine which files use which IVs. Besides the above differences, this flag works like IV_INO_LBLK_64 in that on ext4 it is only allowed if the stable_inodes feature has been enabled to prevent inode numbers and the filesystem UUID from changing. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515204141.251098-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-19fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by defaultEric Biggers1-1/+1
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make test_dummy_encryption test v2 policies by default. Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to known bugs in those tests (see previous commit). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-19fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2Eric Biggers2-9/+131
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2. Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies. To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2. To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags. To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.) Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-15fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()Eric Biggers2-43/+77
Currently, the test_dummy_encryption mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) uses v1 encryption policies, and it relies on userspace inserting a test key into the session keyring. We need test_dummy_encryption to support v2 encryption policies too. Requiring userspace to add the test key doesn't work well with v2 policies, since v2 policies only support the filesystem keyring (not the session keyring), and keys in the filesystem keyring are lost when the filesystem is unmounted. Hooking all test code that unmounts and re-mounts the filesystem would be difficult. Instead, let's make the filesystem automatically add the test key to its keyring when test_dummy_encryption is enabled. That puts the responsibility for choosing the test key on the kernel. We could just hard-code a key. But out of paranoia, let's first try using a per-boot random key, to prevent this code from being misused. A per-boot key will work as long as no one expects dummy-encrypted files to remain accessible after a reboot. (gce-xfstests doesn't.) Therefore, this patch adds a function fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() which implements the above. The next patch will use it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-13fscrypt: remove unnecessary extern keywordsEric Biggers1-44/+40
Remove the unnecessary 'extern' keywords from function declarations. This makes it so that we don't have a mix of both styles, so it won't be ambiguous what to use in new fscrypt patches. This also makes the code shorter and matches the 'checkpatch --strict' expectation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-13fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warningsEric Biggers6-27/+70
Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h. Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters. Detected with: scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones. For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter matches the checkpatch expectation.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-08fscrypt: use crypto_shash_tfm_digest()Eric Biggers2-11/+2
Instead of manually allocating a 'struct shash_desc' on the stack and calling crypto_shash_digest(), switch to using the new helper function crypto_shash_tfm_digest() which does this for us. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2020-03-31Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscryptLinus Torvalds3-15/+42
Pull fscrypt updates from Eric Biggers: "Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves a file's encryption nonce. This makes it easier to write automated tests which verify that fscrypt is doing the encryption correctly" * tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt: ubifs: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE f2fs: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ext4: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE fscrypt: add FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ioctl
2020-03-20fscrypt: add FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ioctlEric Biggers3-15/+42
Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves the nonce from an encrypted file or directory. The nonce is the 16-byte random value stored in the inode's encryption xattr. It is normally used together with the master key to derive the inode's actual encryption key. The nonces are needed by automated tests that verify the correctness of the ciphertext on-disk. Except for the IV_INO_LBLK_64 case, there's no way to replicate a file's ciphertext without knowing that file's nonce. The nonces aren't secret, and the existing ciphertext verification tests in xfstests retrieve them from disk using debugfs or dump.f2fs. But in environments that lack these debugging tools, getting the nonces by manually parsing the filesystem structure would be very hard. To make this important type of testing much easier, let's just add an ioctl that retrieves the nonce. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200314205052.93294-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-03-08fscrypt: don't evict dirty inodes after removing keyEric Biggers1-0/+9
After FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY removes a key, it syncs the filesystem and tries to get and put all inodes that were unlocked by the key so that unused inodes get evicted via fscrypt_drop_inode(). Normally, the inodes are all clean due to the sync. However, after the filesystem is sync'ed, userspace can modify and close one of the files. (Userspace is *supposed* to close the files before removing the key. But it doesn't always happen, and the kernel can't assume it.) This causes the inode to be dirtied and have i_count == 0. Then, fscrypt_drop_inode() failed to consider this case and indicated that the inode can be dropped, causing the write to be lost. On f2fs, other problems such as a filesystem freeze could occur due to the inode being freed while still on f2fs's dirty inode list. Fix this bug by making fscrypt_drop_inode() only drop clean inodes. I've written an xfstest which detects this bug on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. Fixes: b1c0ec3599f4 ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305084138.653498-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: improve format of no-key namesDaniel Rosenberg2-51/+168
When an encrypted directory is listed without the key, the filesystem must show "no-key names" that uniquely identify directory entries, are at most 255 (NAME_MAX) bytes long, and don't contain '/' or '\0'. Currently, for short names the no-key name is the base64 encoding of the ciphertext filename, while for long names it's the base64 encoding of the ciphertext filename's dirhash and second-to-last 16-byte block. This format has the following problems: - Since it doesn't always include the dirhash, it's incompatible with directories that will use a secret-keyed dirhash over the plaintext filenames. In this case, the dirhash won't be computable from the ciphertext name without the key, so it instead must be retrieved from the directory entry and always included in the no-key name. Casefolded encrypted directories will use this type of dirhash. - It's ambiguous: it's possible to craft two filenames that map to the same no-key name, since the method used to abbreviate long filenames doesn't use a proper cryptographic hash function. Solve both these problems by switching to a new no-key name format that is the base64 encoding of a variable-length structure that contains the dirhash, up to 149 bytes of the ciphertext filename, and (if any bytes remain) the SHA-256 of the remaining bytes of the ciphertext filename. This ensures that each no-key name contains everything needed to find the directory entry again, contains only legal characters, doesn't exceed NAME_MAX, is unambiguous unless there's a SHA-256 collision, and that we only take the performance hit of SHA-256 on very long filenames. Note: this change does *not* address the existing issue where users can modify the 'dirhash' part of a no-key name and the filesystem may still accept the name. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved comments and commit message, fixed checking return value of base64_decode(), check for SHA-256 error, continue to set disk_name for short names to keep matching simpler, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-7-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file keyEric Biggers3-24/+25
Now that there's sometimes a second type of per-file key (the dirhash key), clarify some function names, macros, and documentation that specifically deal with per-file *encryption* keys. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directoriesDaniel Rosenberg4-14/+90
When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak information about the names that encryption is meant to protect. Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key. We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose. Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.) Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefoldingDaniel Rosenberg2-0/+35
Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: add "fscrypt_" prefix to fname_encrypt()Eric Biggers3-8/+10
fname_encrypt() is a global function, due to being used in both fname.c and hooks.c. So it should be prefixed with "fscrypt_", like all the other global functions in fs/crypto/. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120071736.45915-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: don't print name of busy file when removing keyEric Biggers1-13/+2
When an encryption key can't be fully removed due to file(s) protected by it still being in-use, we shouldn't really print the path to one of these files to the kernel log, since parts of this path are likely to be encrypted on-disk, and (depending on how the system is set up) the confidentiality of this path might be lost by printing it to the log. This is a trade-off: a single file path often doesn't matter at all, especially if it's a directory; the kernel log might still be protected in some way; and I had originally hoped that any "inode(s) still busy" bugs (which are security weaknesses in their own right) would be quickly fixed and that to do so it would be super helpful to always know the file path and not have to run 'find dir -inum $inum' after the fact. But in practice, these bugs can be hard to fix (e.g. due to asynchronous process killing that is difficult to eliminate, for performance reasons), and also not tied to specific files, so knowing a file path doesn't necessarily help. So to be safe, for now let's just show the inode number, not the path. If someone really wants to know a path they can use 'find -inum'. Fixes: b1c0ec3599f4 ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120060732.390362-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-14fscrypt: document gfp_flags for bounce page allocationEric Biggers1-1/+6
Document that fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() allocates the bounce page from a mempool, and document what this means for the @gfp_flags argument. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191231181026.47400-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-14fscrypt: optimize fscrypt_zeroout_range()Eric Biggers1-31/+81
Currently fscrypt_zeroout_range() issues and waits on a bio for each block it writes, which makes it very slow. Optimize it to write up to 16 pages at a time instead. Also add a function comment, and improve reliability by allowing the allocations of the bio and the first ciphertext page to wait on the corresponding mempools. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191226160813.53182-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: remove redundant bi_status checkEric Biggers1-2/+0
submit_bio_wait() already returns bi_status translated to an errno. So the additional check of bi_status is redundant and can be removed. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209204509.228942-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: Allow modular crypto algorithmsHerbert Xu1-7/+14
The commit 643fa9612bf1 ("fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option") removed modular support for fs/crypto. This causes the Crypto API to be built-in whenever fscrypt is enabled. This makes it very difficult for me to test modular builds of the Crypto API without disabling fscrypt which is a pain. As fscrypt is still evolving and it's developing new ties with the fs layer, it's hard to build it as a module for now. However, the actual algorithms are not required until a filesystem is mounted. Therefore we can allow them to be built as modules. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191227024700.7vrzuux32uyfdgum@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: remove fscrypt_is_direct_key_policy()Eric Biggers1-6/+0
fscrypt_is_direct_key_policy() is no longer used, so remove it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: move fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() to policy.cEric Biggers2-18/+17
fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() is only used by policy.c, so move it to there. Also adjust the order of the checks to be more natural, matching the numerical order of the constants and also keeping AES-256 (the recommended default) first in the list. No change in behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: check for appropriate use of DIRECT_KEY flag earlierEric Biggers4-30/+35
FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY is currently only allowed with Adiantum encryption. But FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY allowed it in combination with other encryption modes, and an error wasn't reported until later when the encrypted directory was actually used. Fix it to report the error earlier by validating the correct use of the DIRECT_KEY flag in fscrypt_supported_policy(), similar to how we validate the IV_INO_LBLK_64 flag. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: split up fscrypt_supported_policy() by policy versionEric Biggers1-57/+59
Make fscrypt_supported_policy() call new functions fscrypt_supported_v1_policy() and fscrypt_supported_v2_policy(), to reduce the indentation level and make the code easier to read. Also adjust the function comment to mention that whether the encryption policy is supported can also depend on the inode. No change in behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: move fscrypt_d_revalidate() to fname.cEric Biggers3-51/+50
fscrypt_d_revalidate() and fscrypt_d_ops really belong in fname.c, since they're specific to filenames encryption. crypto.c is for contents encryption and general fs/crypto/ initialization and utilities. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209204359.228544-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: constify inode parameter to filename encryption functionsEric Biggers2-11/+11
Constify the struct inode parameter to fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() and the other filename encryption functions so that users don't have to pass in a non-const inode when they are dealing with a const one, as in [1]. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20191203051049.44573-6-drosen@google.com/ Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191215213947.9521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: constify struct fscrypt_hkdf parameter to fscrypt_hkdf_expand()Eric Biggers2-2/+2
Constify the struct fscrypt_hkdf parameter to fscrypt_hkdf_expand(). This makes it clearer that struct fscrypt_hkdf contains the key only, not any per-request state. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209204054.227736-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: verify that the crypto_skcipher has the correct ivsizeEric Biggers1-0/+4
As a sanity check, verify that the allocated crypto_skcipher actually has the ivsize that fscrypt is assuming it has. This will always be the case unless there's a bug. But if there ever is such a bug (e.g. like there was in earlier versions of the ESSIV conversion patch [1]) it's preferable for it to be immediately obvious, and not rely on the ciphertext verification tests failing due to uninitialized IV bytes. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20190702215517.GA69157@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209203918.225691-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: use crypto_skcipher_driver_name()Eric Biggers1-2/+1
Crypto API users shouldn't really be accessing struct skcipher_alg directly. <crypto/skcipher.h> already has a function crypto_skcipher_driver_name(), so use that instead. No change in behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209203810.225302-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: support passing a keyring key to FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEYEric Biggers1-8/+124
Extend the FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl to allow the raw key to be specified by a Linux keyring key, rather than specified directly. This is useful because fscrypt keys belong to a particular filesystem instance, so they are destroyed when that filesystem is unmounted. Usually this is desired. But in some cases, userspace may need to unmount and re-mount the filesystem while keeping the keys, e.g. during a system update. This requires keeping the keys somewhere else too. The keys could be kept in memory in a userspace daemon. But depending on the security architecture and assumptions, it can be preferable to keep them only in kernel memory, where they are unreadable by userspace. We also can't solve this by going back to the original fscrypt API (where for each file, the master key was looked up in the process's keyring hierarchy) because that caused lots of problems of its own. Therefore, add the ability for FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY to accept a Linux keyring key. This solves the problem by allowing userspace to (if needed) save the keys securely in a Linux keyring for re-provisioning, while still using the new fscrypt key management ioctls. This is analogous to how dm-crypt accepts a Linux keyring key, but the key is then stored internally in the dm-crypt data structures rather than being looked up again each time the dm-crypt device is accessed. Use a custom key type "fscrypt-provisioning" rather than one of the existing key types such as "logon". This is strongly desired because it enforces that these keys are only usable for a particular purpose: for fscrypt as input to a particular KDF. Otherwise, the keys could also be passed to any kernel API that accepts a "logon" key with any service prefix, e.g. dm-crypt, UBIFS, or (recently proposed) AF_ALG. This would risk leaking information about the raw key despite it ostensibly being unreadable. Of course, this mistake has already been made for multiple kernel APIs; but since this is a new API, let's do it right. This patch has been tested using an xfstest which I wrote to test it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191119222447.226853-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-09treewide: Use sizeof_field() macroPankaj Bharadiya1-1/+1
Replace all the occurrences of FIELD_SIZEOF() with sizeof_field() except at places where these are defined. Later patches will remove the unused definition of FIELD_SIZEOF(). This patch is generated using following script: EXCLUDE_FILES="include/linux/stddef.h|include/linux/kernel.h" git grep -l -e "\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b" | while read file; do if [[ "$file" =~ $EXCLUDE_FILES ]]; then continue fi sed -i -e 's/\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b/sizeof_field/g' $file; done Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190924105839.110713-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com Co-developed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> # for net
2019-11-06fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policiesEric Biggers5-18/+100
Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-11-06fscrypt: avoid data race on fscrypt_mode::logged_impl_nameEric Biggers2-5/+3
The access to logged_impl_name is technically a data race, which tools like KCSAN could complain about in the future. See: https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/READ_ONCE-and-WRITE_ONCE Fix by using xchg(), which also ensures that only one thread does the logging. This also required switching from bool to int, to avoid a build error on the RISC-V architecture which doesn't implement xchg on bytes. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-21fscrypt: zeroize fscrypt_info before freeingEric Biggers1-0/+1
memset the struct fscrypt_info to zero before freeing. This isn't really needed currently, since there's no secret key directly in the fscrypt_info. But there's a decent chance that someone will add such a field in the future, e.g. in order to use an API that takes a raw key such as siphash(). So it's good to do this as a hardening measure. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-21fscrypt: remove struct fscrypt_ctxEric Biggers3-131/+10
Now that ext4 and f2fs implement their own post-read workflow that supports both fscrypt and fsverity, the fscrypt-only workflow based around struct fscrypt_ctx is no longer used. So remove the unused code. This is based on a patch from Chandan Rajendra's "Consolidate FS read I/O callbacks code" patchset, but rebased onto the latest kernel, folded __fscrypt_decrypt_bio() into fscrypt_decrypt_bio(), cleaned up fscrypt_initialize(), and updated the commit message. Originally-from: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-21fscrypt: invoke crypto API for ESSIV handlingEric Biggers4-114/+11
Instead of open-coding the calculations for ESSIV handling, use an ESSIV skcipher which does all of this under the hood. ESSIV was added to the crypto API in v5.4. This is based on a patch from Ard Biesheuvel, but reworked to apply after all the fscrypt changes that went into v5.4. Tested with 'kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g encrypt', including the ciphertext verification tests for v1 and v2 encryption policies. Originally-from: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: require that key be added when setting a v2 encryption policyEric Biggers3-1/+63
By looking up the master keys in a filesystem-level keyring rather than in the calling processes' key hierarchy, it becomes possible for a user to set an encryption policy which refers to some key they don't actually know, then encrypt their files using that key. Cryptographically this isn't much of a problem, but the semantics of this would be a bit weird. Thus, enforce that a v2 encryption policy can only be set if the user has previously added the key, or has capable(CAP_FOWNER). We tolerate that this problem will continue to exist for v1 encryption policies, however; there is no way around that. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: add FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS ioctlEric Biggers1-5/+24
Add a root-only variant of the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl which removes all users' claims of the key, not just the current user's claim. I.e., it always removes the key itself, no matter how many users have added it. This is useful for forcing a directory to be locked, without having to figure out which user ID(s) the key was added under. This is planned to be used by a command like 'sudo fscrypt lock DIR --all-users' in the fscrypt userspace tool (http://github.com/google/fscrypt). Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: allow unprivileged users to add/remove keys for v2 policiesEric Biggers3-33/+336
Allow the FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY and FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctls to be used by non-root users to add and remove encryption keys from the filesystem-level crypto keyrings, subject to limitations. Motivation: while privileged fscrypt key management is sufficient for some users (e.g. Android and Chromium OS, where a privileged process manages all keys), the old API by design also allows non-root users to set up and use encrypted directories, and we don't want to regress on that. Especially, we don't want to force users to continue using the old API, running into the visibility mismatch between files and keyrings and being unable to "lock" encrypted directories. Intuitively, the ioctls have to be privileged since they manipulate filesystem-level state. However, it's actually safe to make them unprivileged if we very carefully enforce some specific limitations. First, each key must be identified by a cryptographic hash so that a user can't add the wrong key for another user's files. For v2 encryption policies, we use the key_identifier for this. v1 policies don't have this, so managing keys for them remains privileged. Second, each key a user adds is charged to their quota for the keyrings service. Thus, a user can't exhaust memory by adding a huge number of keys. By default each non-root user is allowed up to 200 keys; this can be changed using the existing sysctl 'kernel.keys.maxkeys'. Third, if multiple users add the same key, we keep track of those users of the key (of which there remains a single copy), and won't really remove the key, i.e. "lock" the encrypted files, until all those users have removed it. This prevents denial of service attacks that would be possible under simpler schemes, such allowing the first user who added a key to remove it -- since that could be a malicious user who has compromised the key. Of course, encryption keys should be kept secret, but the idea is that using encryption should never be *less* secure than not using encryption, even if your key was compromised. We tolerate that a user will be unable to really remove a key, i.e. unable to "lock" their encrypted files, if another user has added the same key. But in a sense, this is actually a good thing because it will avoid providing a false notion of security where a key appears to have been removed when actually it's still in memory, available to any attacker who compromises the operating system kernel. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>