summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-06-05selftests: mlxsw: ingress_rif_conf_1d: Fix the diagramPetr Machata1-3/+2
The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adjust the diagram. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-08-19selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridgeAmit Cohen1-0/+264
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs to be routed will ingress the router block. For VLAN-unaware bridges (802.1D), the FID classification is done according to {Port, VID}. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, all the existing {Port, VID}->FID mappings should be updated by the software with the new RIF. In addition, when a new mapping is added for FID which already has a RIF, the correct RIF should be used for it. Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after {Port, VID}->FID classification, regardless of the order of the configuration. # ./ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ] TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ] Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>